Compare commits
41 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
be300652f3 | ||
|
|
5348007d86 | ||
|
|
be4806c22a | ||
|
|
58fa0820fe | ||
|
|
c5e8e88fc6 | ||
|
|
7719fd5a3a | ||
|
|
6c461a2711 | ||
|
|
90a24c0cf1 | ||
|
|
17e38b5ce6 | ||
|
|
c486c8e603 | ||
|
|
82247241ed | ||
|
|
29c6a1ca1e | ||
|
|
20ede2208c | ||
|
|
9bc64c0764 | ||
|
|
a364c80a15 | ||
|
|
bb744cb11f | ||
|
|
bf66366603 | ||
|
|
fe9dd77606 | ||
|
|
ac71191a66 | ||
|
|
2affa1fd0a | ||
|
|
0a930bbd7d | ||
|
|
fd178fa4ee | ||
|
|
83b48f11e6 | ||
|
|
2a1743e155 | ||
|
|
ddecb69057 | ||
|
|
50b25576b3 | ||
|
|
05ab13a684 | ||
|
|
594b345ff9 | ||
|
|
82ac0196a7 | ||
|
|
8b0d25cadb | ||
|
|
535365ea67 | ||
|
|
6fd1d985d4 | ||
|
|
229bb34b09 | ||
|
|
d7b381307c | ||
|
|
5046c79d1c | ||
|
|
0533e4bc33 | ||
|
|
18956ffe75 | ||
|
|
75c0da19d8 | ||
|
|
2584232b70 | ||
|
|
fa6c2e9f0d | ||
|
|
6218217d49 |
32
Makefile
|
|
@ -14,20 +14,34 @@ all: thesis.pdf
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# We need three runs for biblatex's defernumbers
|
# We need three runs for biblatex's defernumbers
|
||||||
%.pdf: %.tex common-packages.tex common-defs.tex main.bib version.tex
|
%.pdf: %.tex common-packages.tex common-defs.tex main.bib version.tex
|
||||||
pdflatex -shell-escape -jobname thesis '\def\thesispreviewmode{}\input{$<}'
|
pdflatex -shell-escape -jobname $* '\def\thesispreviewmode{}\input{$<}'
|
||||||
biber $*
|
biber $*
|
||||||
pdflatex -shell-escape -jobname thesis '\def\thesispreviewmode{}\input{$<}'
|
pdflatex -shell-escape -jobname $* '\def\thesispreviewmode{}\input{$<}'
|
||||||
pdflatex -shell-escape -jobname thesis '\def\thesispreviewmode{}\input{$<}'
|
pdflatex -shell-escape -jobname $* '\def\thesispreviewmode{}\input{$<}'
|
||||||
echo
|
echo
|
||||||
echo "Undefined biblatex references:"
|
echo "Undefined biblatex references:"
|
||||||
grep -A2 'Package biblatex Warning: The following entry could not be found' thesis.log | sed -n '3~4{s/(biblatex) *//;p}' || echo "<None>"
|
grep -A2 'Package biblatex Warning: The following entry could not be found' thesis.log | sed -n '3~4{s/(biblatex) *//;p}' || echo "<None>"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#.PHONY: preview
|
%-oneside.pdf: %.tex common-packages.tex common-defs.tex main.bib version.tex
|
||||||
final:
|
pdflatex -shell-escape -jobname $*-oneside '\def\thesispreviewmode{}\def\thesisoneside{}\input{$<}'
|
||||||
pdflatex -shell-escape $<
|
biber $*-oneside
|
||||||
biber $*
|
pdflatex -shell-escape -jobname $*-oneside '\def\thesispreviewmode{}\def\thesisoneside{}\input{$<}'
|
||||||
pdflatex -shell-escape $<
|
pdflatex -shell-escape -jobname $*-oneside '\def\thesispreviewmode{}\def\thesisoneside{}\input{$<}'
|
||||||
pdflatex -shell-escape $<
|
echo
|
||||||
|
echo "Undefined biblatex references:"
|
||||||
|
grep -A2 'Package biblatex Warning: The following entry could not be found' thesis.log | sed -n '3~4{s/(biblatex) *//;p}' || echo "<None>"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%-final.pdf: %.tex common-packages.tex common-defs.tex main.bib version.tex abstract.tex abstract-de.tex
|
||||||
|
pdflatex -jobname $*-final -shell-escape $<
|
||||||
|
biber $*-final
|
||||||
|
pdflatex -jobname $*-final -shell-escape $<
|
||||||
|
pdflatex -jobname $*-final -shell-escape $<
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%-final-oneside.pdf: %.tex common-packages.tex common-defs.tex main.bib version.tex
|
||||||
|
pdflatex -shell-escape -jobname $*-final-oneside '\def\thesisoneside{}\input{$<}'
|
||||||
|
biber $*-final-oneside
|
||||||
|
pdflatex -shell-escape -jobname $*-final-oneside '\def\thesisoneside{}\input{$<}'
|
||||||
|
pdflatex -shell-escape -jobname $*-final-oneside '\def\thesisoneside{}\input{$<}'
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
version.tex: thesis.tex $(addsuffix /chapter.tex,${CHAPTERS})
|
version.tex: thesis.tex $(addsuffix /chapter.tex,${CHAPTERS})
|
||||||
echo "${VERSION_STRING}" > $@
|
echo "${VERSION_STRING}" > $@
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -4,38 +4,56 @@
|
||||||
\adjustmtc
|
\adjustmtc
|
||||||
\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{Kurzzusammenfassung}
|
\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{Kurzzusammenfassung}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\todo{Re-translate, manually check translation}
|
\marginpar{This section is a translated copy of the English abstract below.}
|
||||||
\marginpar{This section is a machine-translated copy of the English abstract below.}
|
Im Laufe der letzten Jahrzehnte habe Fortschritte in der Kryptographie sowie Techniken wie formale Verifikation den
|
||||||
Mit kryptografischen Fortschritten und Techniken wie der formalen Verifizierung, die zu immer sichererer Software
|
Stand der Softwaresicherheit stetig verbessert. Gleichzeitig hat das Gebiet der Hardwaresicherheit mit diesen
|
||||||
führen, rückt die Hardwareebene in den Fokus der aktuellen Computersicherheitsforschung. Der Stand der Technik in
|
Entwicklungen nicht Schritt halten können. Trotz Fortschritten in Teilgebieten wie der Resilienz gegenüber
|
||||||
der Hardwaresicherheit stützt sich jedoch oft noch auf den Einsatz mikroelektronischer Integration, um Sicherheit durch
|
Seitenkanalangriffen und Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) ist der Stand der Technik in der Hardwaresicherheit
|
||||||
Verschleierung zu erreichen, anstatt aufgrundlegendere Sicherheitsgarantien. Manchmal wird auch Manipulationsschutz auf
|
nach wie vor auf die Verwendung mikroelektronischer Strukturen fokussiert. Solche erreichen einen Grad der Security
|
||||||
Systemebene eingesetzt, der jedoch aufgrund der hohen Kosten und der geringen Leistung von Geräten wie
|
by Obscurity, liefern jedoch keine fundierteren Sicherheitsgarantien. Systemweite Manipulationsschutzmaßnahmen
|
||||||
Hardware-Sicherheitsmodulen (HSMs) nach wie vor auf Nischenanwendungen beschränkt ist.
|
werden nur vereinzelt in Geräten wie z.B.\ Hardware-Sicherheitsmodulen (HSMs) und Kartenzahlungsterminals
|
||||||
|
eingesetzt. Insbesondere HSMs werden aufgrund ihrer hohen Kosten und geringen Rechenleistung nur in
|
||||||
|
Nischenanwendungen wie z.B.\ der Zertifikatsausstellung im Transport Layer Security (TLS)-System sowie der
|
||||||
|
Zahlungsdatenverarbeitung eingesetzt.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In dieser Arbeit stellt Jan Sebastian Götte das Inertial Hardware Security Module (IHSM) vor, eine neue Architektur für
|
In dieser Dissertation wird das Inertiale Hardware-Sicherheitsmodul (IHSM) vorgestellt, eine neue Architektur für
|
||||||
kostengünstige Hardware-Sicherheitsmodule, die einen hohen aktiven Manipulationsschutz bieten und gleichzeitig
|
Hardware-Sicherheitsmodule. IHSMs stellen einen hoch sicheren, aktiven Manipulationsschutz bereit.
|
||||||
Rechenleistungen unterstützen, dieim Vergleich zu herkömmlichen HSMs viel größer, schwerer und leistungsstärker sind. In
|
Gleichzeitig können mithilfe der IHSM-Technologie kryptographische Rechnersysteme von wesentlich größeren
|
||||||
einem IHSM wird das kostspielige und schwer zu beschaffende Manipulationserkennungsgitter eines herkömmlichen HSM durch
|
Abmessungen, Gewicht und elektrischer Leistungsaufnahme geschützt werden, als es in konventionellen HSMs möglich
|
||||||
ein Mesh aus einfachen Leiterplatten ersetzt, das sich mit hoher Geschwindigkeitum die Nutzlast dreht. Da sich das Mesh
|
ist. IHSMs ersetzen die kostenintensiven und in der Herstellung aufwendigen Meshes
|
||||||
dreht, kann es nicht manipuliert werden, und die Sicherheit herkömmlicher Mesh, die in maßgeschneiderten
|
(Manipulationserkennungsmembranen) konventioneller HSMs durch eine Konstruktion, in der Meshes aus einfachen
|
||||||
Fertigungsprozessen hergestellt werden, kann mit viel einfacheren und kostengünstigeren Konstruktionstechnikenerreicht
|
Platinen aufgebaut werden. Diese Meshes rotieren schnell um das geschützte Rechnersystem, was eine unerkannte
|
||||||
werden. Die Dissertation präsentiert Lösungen für wichtige technische Herausforderungen bei der Konstruktion von IHSMs,
|
Manipulation verhindert. IHSMs erreichen so mithilfe wensentlich einfacherer und kostengünstiger
|
||||||
darunter ein hochsymmetrischesplanares Induktionsspulendesign für die rotierende drahtlose Energieübertragung und ein
|
Konstruktionstechniken ein Sicherheitsniveau, das dem konventioneller Manipulationsschutzmembranen gleicht, die in
|
||||||
hochpräzises Überwachungssystem für kostengünstige Sicherheitsgitter.
|
spezialisierten Herstellungsprozessen gefertigt werden. In der Dissertation werden die Ergebnisse einer
|
||||||
|
Übersichtsstudie vorgestellt, die etwa 30 echte Implementierungen socher Meshes untersucht. In der Studie werden
|
||||||
|
Kriterien für die Entwicklung sicherer Meshes abgeleitet, anhand derer das IHSM-Konzept kontextualisiert wird. Um
|
||||||
|
die Notwendigkeit sicherer Hardware zu erörtern, wird in dieser Dissertation darüber hinaus eine Analyse einiger
|
||||||
|
problematischer Aspekte des Hardwaresicherheitskonzeptes der Deutschen elektronischen Patientenakte vorgestellt.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Unter Anwendung der IHSM-Technologie schließt die Dissertation mit zwei Analysen von Anwendungsfällen, die durch die
|
Um den Weg für zukünftige, praktische Implementierungen der IHSM-Technologie zu bereiten, werden weiterhin Lösungen
|
||||||
erhöhte Größe und Verlustleistungsfähigkeit von IHSMs ermöglicht werden. In der ersten Analyse wird ein IHSM-gesicherter
|
für wichtige Schlüsselprobleme der Konstruktion von IHSMs vorgestellt. Diese Lösungen umfassen ein neues Konzept für
|
||||||
Relaisknoten für Quantenschlüsselverteilungssysteme (QKD) vorgeschlagen, der deren praktische Implementierung über
|
rotationssymmetrische Planarspulen für die drahtlose Energieübertragung an rotierende Empfänger, sowie ein
|
||||||
beliebige Entfernungen ermöglicht, wasaufgrund grundlegender physikalischer Einschränkungen vertrauenswürdige
|
hochpräzises und dennoch kostengünstiges Überwachungssystem für Meshes. Dieses Überwachungssystem beruht auf dem
|
||||||
Relaisstationen erfordert. In der Studie werden IHSMs für solchehochsicheren QKD-Relais angepasst, indem der
|
Prinzip der Zeitbereichsreflektometrie und erkennt selbst fortgeschrittene Angriffstechniken zuverlässig. In
|
||||||
IHSM-Netzdurchgang mit einem sekundären manipulationssensitiven Netz gesichert wird. In diesem Aufbau wird
|
praktischen Versuchen zeigte sich, dass das System ausreichend empfindlich ist, um mehrere identische Kopien
|
||||||
ein Klammerdesign vorgeschlagen, das den Durchgang durch Glasfasern mit geringen Verlusten unterstützt.
|
desselben Meshes voneinander zu unterscheiden, was auf PUF-ähnliche Eigenschaften hindeutet.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Der zweite vorgeschlagene Anwendungsfall passt ein IHSM-Gehäuse an die Anforderungen hinsichtlich Größe, Leistung und
|
In der Dissertation werden zwei konkrete Anwendungsszenarien erläutert, die erst durch das größere Volumen und die
|
||||||
Wärmeableitung eines Hochleistungsservers an, um gemeinsam genutzte sichere Multiparty-Computing-Workloads (MPC) zu
|
höhere Leistungsaufnahme möglich werden, die die IHSM-Technologie ermöglicht. Im ersten Anwendungsszenario wird eine
|
||||||
unterstützen. MPC ist in der Praxis durch Netzwerkbandbreite und Latenzbedingungen eingeschränkt, die ohne physisch
|
IHSM-geschützte Zwischenstation vorgeschlagen, um die durch physikalische Grundgesetze sonst stark eingeschränkte
|
||||||
sichere Knoten nicht vermieden werden können. Herkömmliche HSMskönnen MPC-Workloads nicht bedienen, da ihre
|
erreichbare Entfernung eines Quantenschlüsselaustausch (QKD)-Systems zu vergrößern. Im Rahmen dieses
|
||||||
kryptografische Leistung um viele Größenordnungen zu gering ist. Ein durch IHSM gesicherter MPC-Knoten umgeht diese
|
Anwendungsszenarios wird ein sekundäres Mesh vorgestellt, dass die Achsdurchführung des primären IHSM-Meshes
|
||||||
Einschränkungen und eröffnet ein neues Leistungsspektrum.
|
zusätzlich schützt. Weiterhin wird in der Fallstudie der Entwurf eines mechanischen Trägers für diese zusätzlich
|
||||||
|
geschützte Achsdurchführung vorgestellt, der das QKD-System im inneren des IHSM mit der Außenwelt über
|
||||||
|
verlustarme Glasfaserleitungen verbindet.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In der zweiten Fallstudie wird ein Konzept vorgestellt, das mithilfe IHSM-geschützter, leistungsstarker
|
||||||
|
Serverhardware kolokierte Secure Multiparty Computation (MPC)-Berechnungen ermöglicht. Hierzu wird IHSM-Technologie
|
||||||
|
an die Anforderungen leistungsstaker Serverhardware in Größe, Leistungsaufnahme, und ableitbarer Verlustleistung
|
||||||
|
angepasst. Wird MPC praktisch eingesetzt, werden Knoten über mehrere Rechenzentren verteilt um einen Single Point of
|
||||||
|
Failure zu vermeiden. Diese Verteilung führt jedoch zu geringer Netzwerkbandbreite und hohen Latenzen zwischen den
|
||||||
|
MPC-Knoten, was die erreichbare MPC-Rechenleistung stark einschränkt. Durch den Einsatz von IHSMs können physisch
|
||||||
|
gesicherte MPC-Knoten innerhalb desselben Rechenzentrums betrieben werden, was durch die damit erreichbare höheren
|
||||||
|
Bandbreiten und geringeren Latenzen einen Leistungsbereich der MPC-Berechnungen erschließt.
|
||||||
\end{otherlanguage}
|
\end{otherlanguage}
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
55
abstract.tex
|
|
@ -3,33 +3,40 @@
|
||||||
\adjustmtc
|
\adjustmtc
|
||||||
\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{Abstract}
|
\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{Abstract}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%Through advancements in cryptography, nowadays it is feasible to construct networked computer systems that for all
|
In the past decades, cryptographic advancements and techniques like formal verification have steadily improved software
|
||||||
%intents and purposes cannot be hacked over the network. Correctly applying cryptographic protocols and techniques such
|
security. Meanwhile, the field of hardware security has not kept pace. Research has made progress in subfields such as
|
||||||
%as formal verification, it can be ensured that a software implementation is a flawless representation of its theoretical
|
resilience to Side-Channel Attacks (SCA) and Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs). However, the state of the art still
|
||||||
%model, and that the theoretical model is secure given universally accepted cryptographic assumptions. Despite
|
often relies on microelectronic integration to achieve security by obscurity insted of more fundamental security
|
||||||
|
guarantees. While effective, system-level tamper protection is only used in few devices such as Hardware Security
|
||||||
|
Modules (HSMs) and card payment terminals. Due to the high cost and low performance of HSMs in particular, they remain
|
||||||
|
relegated to niche applications such as Transport Layer Security (TLS) certificate issuance and payment data processing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
With cryptographic advancements and techniques like formal verification leading to increasingly secure software, the
|
In this thesis, we introduce the Inertial Hardware Security Module (IHSM), a new architecture for low-cost hardware
|
||||||
hardware level advances into the focus of contemporary applied computer security research. However, the state of the art
|
security modules that provide high-level active tamper protection, while supporting computing payloads of much larger
|
||||||
in hardware security still often relies on the use of microelectronic integration to achieve security by obscurity over
|
size, weight and power dissipation compared to conventional HSMs. In an IHSM, the costly and difficult to source
|
||||||
more fundamental security guarantees. System-level tamper protection is sometimes used, but remains relegated to niche
|
tamper-sensing mesh of a conventional HSM is replaced by a mesh made from simple PCBs that is rotating at high speed
|
||||||
applications due to the high cost and low performance of devices like Hardware Security Modules (HSMs).
|
around the payload. Since the mesh is rotating at high speed, it cannot be manipulated, and the security of conventional
|
||||||
|
meshes created in bespoke manufacturing processes can be achieved using much simpler and less expensive construction
|
||||||
|
techniques. We present the results of a survey of approximately 30 real world tamper sensing mesh implementations. Based
|
||||||
|
on our findings, we deduce design criteria for secure meshes and contextualize our design. We further motivate the
|
||||||
|
necessity of secure hardware by presenting an analysis of problematic aspects in the hardware security design of
|
||||||
|
Germany's new national electronic health record system.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this thesis, Jan Sebastian Götte introduces the Inertial Hardware Security Module (IHSM), a new architecture for
|
To pave the way for practical implementations of IHSM technology, we present solutions to key engineering challenges in
|
||||||
low-cost hardware security modules that provide high-level active tamper protection, while supporting computing payloads
|
IHSM construction. We present a design and analysis of highly symmetric planar inductors for rotating wireless power
|
||||||
of much larger size, weight and power dissipation compared to conventional HSMs. In an IHSM, the costly and difficult to
|
transfer that improves self-resonant frequency by up to \qty{58}{\percent} and inductance by up to \qty{6.5}{\percent}
|
||||||
source tamper-sensing mesh of a conventional HSM is replaced by a mesh made from simple PCBs that is rotating at high
|
in our tests. Complementing this research, we present a high-fidelity, low-cost monitoring system for security meshes
|
||||||
speed around the payload. Since the mesh is rotating, it cannot be manipulated, and the security of conventional meshes
|
that is based on the principles of Time-Domain Reflectometry (TDR), reaching \qty{184}{\pico\second} time resolution. We
|
||||||
created in bespoke manufacturing processes can be achieved using much simpler and less expensive construction
|
validate our system and find that it is able to reliably detect several classes of advanced physical attacks. We find
|
||||||
techniques. The thesis presents solutions to key engineering challenges in IHSM construction including a highly
|
that our system is sensitive enough to detect differences between identical copies of the same mesh, suggesting PUF-like
|
||||||
symmetric planar inductor design for rotating wireless power transfer and a high-fidelity monitoring system for low-cost
|
properties.
|
||||||
security meshes.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Applying IHSM technology, the thesis concludes with analyses of two use cases that are unlocked by the increased
|
Applying IHSM technology, we analyse two use cases that are unlocked by the increased size and power dissipation
|
||||||
size and power dissipation capability of IHSMs. In the first analysis, an IHSM-secured relay node for Quantum Key
|
capability of IHSMs. In the first analysis, an IHSM-secured relay node for Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) systems is
|
||||||
Distribution (QKD) systems is proposed, enabling their practical implementation across arbitrary distances, which
|
proposed, enabling their practical implementation across arbitrary distances, which requires trusted relay stations due
|
||||||
requires trusted relay stations due to fundamental physical limitations. In the study, IHSMs are adapted for such
|
to fundamental physical limitations. In the study, IHSMs are adapted for such high-security QKD relays by securing the
|
||||||
high-security QKD relays by securing the IHSM mesh passthrough with a secondary tamper-sensing mesh. In this setup, a
|
IHSM mesh passthrough with a secondary tamper-sensing mesh. In this setup, a bracket design is proposed that supports
|
||||||
bracket design is proposed that supports passing through optical fibers at low loss.
|
passing through optical fibers at low loss.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The second proposed use case adapts an IHSM enclosure to the size, power and thermal dissipation requirements of a
|
The second proposed use case adapts an IHSM enclosure to the size, power and thermal dissipation requirements of a
|
||||||
high-power server to support co-located secure Multiparty Computation (MPC) workloads. In practical MPC deployments,
|
high-power server to support co-located secure Multiparty Computation (MPC) workloads. In practical MPC deployments,
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -6,25 +6,26 @@
|
||||||
This thesis has been written during the years of 2020 - 2025. In this time, Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology
|
This thesis has been written during the years of 2020 - 2025. In this time, Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology
|
||||||
including Large Language Models (LLMs) has entered widespread adoption. I have used such LLM systems in the preparation
|
including Large Language Models (LLMs) has entered widespread adoption. I have used such LLM systems in the preparation
|
||||||
of this thesis. At the time this thesis was written, LLMs were a powerful and useful technology, but often produced
|
of this thesis. At the time this thesis was written, LLMs were a powerful and useful technology, but often produced
|
||||||
wrong output. Thus, I used the following list of observations to guide my LLM use during the writing of this thesis.
|
wrong output. Thus I used the following list of observations to guide my LLM use during the writing of this thesis.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||||
\item Passing text through an LLM is an imprecise operation. Especially when large amounts of text are passed
|
\item Passing text through an LLM is an imprecise operation. Especially when large amounts of text are passed
|
||||||
through an LLM, despite clear instructions such as ``only fix spelling errors,'' the LLM output might deviate
|
through an LLM, despite clear instructions such as ``only fix spelling errors,'' the LLM output might deviate
|
||||||
from the source text. Therefore, the document text should never be passed through the LLM, and the LLM should be
|
from the source text. Therefore, the document text should never be passed through the LLM, and the LLM should be
|
||||||
prompted to point out problems, or to produce a list of suggestions for improvements instead.
|
prompted to point out problems, or to produce a list of suggestions for improvements instead.
|
||||||
\item LLMs are really bad at summarizing text that contains novel concepts. LLM summaries of text often converge to
|
\item Contemporary LLMs are bad at summarizing text that contains novel concepts. LLM summaries of text often
|
||||||
a re-stating of the general consensus on the text's main topic. Where the source text deviates from conventional
|
converge to a re-stating of the general consensus on the text's main topic. Where the source text deviates from
|
||||||
wisdom or makes novel points, an LLM summary will likely mis-represent those conclusions. Additionally, LLMs are
|
conventional wisdom or makes novel points, an LLM summary will likely mis-represent those conclusions.
|
||||||
bad at capturing the point of a text. Unless extreme care is taken when prompting, it is easy to lead an LLM to
|
Additionally, LLMs are bad at capturing the point of a text. Unless extreme care is taken when prompting, it is
|
||||||
produce an inaccurate summary of a text that agrees with the prompt, but misses the gist of the text. Therefore,
|
easy to lead an LLM to produce an inaccurate summary of a text that agrees with the prompt, but misses the gist
|
||||||
extreme caution should be applied when using an LLM for summarization, and LLM output should be checked
|
of the text. Therefore, extreme caution should be applied when using an LLM for summarization, and LLM output
|
||||||
diligently in such instances.
|
should be checked diligently in such instances.
|
||||||
\item LLMs are bad at generating text from scratch. Especially on topics of academic interest that are novel and
|
\item Contemporary LLMs are bad at generating text from scratch. Especially on topics of academic interest that are
|
||||||
that do not have well-known answers that can be found in the training corpus for these models, in general they
|
novel and that do not have well-known answers that can be found in the training corpus for these models, in
|
||||||
will not produce useful text when prompted. Therefore, LLMs should never be used to generate novel text.
|
general they will not produce useful text when prompted. Therefore, LLMs should never be used to generate novel
|
||||||
\item LLMs are really bad at giving references. Prompts that ask for academic references on a topic are likely to
|
text.
|
||||||
produce non-existing ``hallucinated'' references. The existing references an LLM is most likely to dig up
|
\item Contemporary LLMs are bad at giving references. Prompts that ask for academic references on a topic are likely
|
||||||
|
to produce non-existing ``hallucinated'' references. The existing references an LLM is most likely to dig up
|
||||||
usually occur on the first page of a web search on the topic, or are frequently cited in literature on the
|
usually occur on the first page of a web search on the topic, or are frequently cited in literature on the
|
||||||
topic. Thus, LLMs should never be directly queried for references. When researching a new concept, a better use
|
topic. Thus, LLMs should never be directly queried for references. When researching a new concept, a better use
|
||||||
of an LLM is the generation of query strings for search engines like Google Scholar.
|
of an LLM is the generation of query strings for search engines like Google Scholar.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -3,22 +3,29 @@
|
||||||
political tool, and it confers on the field an intrinsically moral dimension.}
|
political tool, and it confers on the field an intrinsically moral dimension.}
|
||||||
\chapter{Conclusion}
|
\chapter{Conclusion}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this thesis, we propose Inertial Hardware Security Modules (IHSMs), a new approach to physical security that combines
|
In this thesis, we provided an examination of the field of Hardware Security Modules both from an academic perspective
|
||||||
conventional tamper-sensing meshes with physical movement to bootstrap a highly secure system from low-security,
|
and with regards to their practical implementation. We answered our first research question introduced in
|
||||||
off-the-shelf parts, solving our first research question introduced in Chapter~\ref{chapter-intro}. To motivate our
|
Chapter~\ref{chapter-intro} on the current state of the art in Chapters~\ref{chapter-epa} and \ref{chapter-survey},
|
||||||
research, we use the German national digital health record system as an example demonstrating the difficulties in
|
providing a comprehensive view of practical implementations. Chapter~\ref{chapter-epa} motivates our research using the
|
||||||
achieving useful hardware security in practice. Besides some minor cryptographic oddities, our analysis reveals at least
|
German national digital health record system as an example that demonstrates the difficulties in achieving practical
|
||||||
one essential specification mistake that negates the hardware security of the system by unnecessarily introducing a
|
hardware security. Besides some minor cryptographic oddities, our analysis reveals at least one essential specification
|
||||||
poorly protected HSM. With this motivation in mind, we support the construction of concretely secure IHSMs by providing
|
mistake that negates the hardware security of the system by unnecessarily introducing a poorly protected HSM. In
|
||||||
deep analyses of two key engineering challenges in IHSM construction, mesh monitoring and power transfer. Solving our
|
Chapter~\ref{chapter-survey}, we answer our second research question in a detailed survey of a wide range of devices
|
||||||
second research question, we propose a low-cost TDR-based mesh monitoring system that exceeds the capabilities of
|
that utilize tamper-sensing meshes, distilling a set of criteria for the design of secure tamper-sensing meshes. In
|
||||||
previous systems from academic or from patent literature. Our system is capable of monitoring large meshes while
|
Chapter~\ref{chapter-ihsm}, we propose Inertial Hardware Security Modules (IHSMs), a new approach to physical security
|
||||||
simultaneously providing detailed results. Our TDR-based mesh monitoring system is of independent interest, since it can
|
that combines conventional tamper-sensing meshes with physical movement. IHSMs enable bootstrapping a highly secure
|
||||||
also be integrated into traditional HSM designs. We additionally propose a new, generalized design for high-frequency
|
system from low-security, off-the-shelf parts, thereby solving our third research question on achieving physical
|
||||||
PCB inductors with low parasitic capacitance. Our design provides better bandwidth and lower parasitic capacitance
|
security without bespoke components. We support the construction of concretely secure IHSMs by providing deep analyses
|
||||||
compared to the state of the art without increasing implementation cost. We conclude this thesis with two chapters
|
of two key engineering challenges in IHSM construction, mesh monitoring and power transfer. Solving our fourth research
|
||||||
elaborating on two new use cases that are made possible by IHSM technology due to its ability to protect large payloads
|
question on mesh monitoring fidelity, we propose a low-cost TDR-based mesh monitoring system that exceeds the
|
||||||
that have high power consumption. Together, these results answer our third and final research question.
|
capabilities of previous systems from academic or from patent literature. Our system is capable of monitoring large
|
||||||
|
meshes while simultaneously providing detailed results. Our TDR-based mesh monitoring system is of independent interest,
|
||||||
|
since it can also be integrated into traditional HSM designs. Solving our fifth research question on ripple reduction
|
||||||
|
for rotating Wireless Power Transfer for IHSMs, we propose a new, generalized design for high-frequency PCB inductors
|
||||||
|
with low parasitic capacitance. Beyond our IHSM application, our design provides better bandwidth and lower parasitic
|
||||||
|
capacitance compared to the state of the art without increasing implementation cost. We conclude this thesis with two
|
||||||
|
chapters elaborating on two new use cases that are made possible by IHSM technology due to its ability to protect large
|
||||||
|
payloads that have high power consumption. Together, these results answer our sixth and final research question.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The research presented in this thesis is aimed at advancing both academic research and applied engineering in hardware
|
The research presented in this thesis is aimed at advancing both academic research and applied engineering in hardware
|
||||||
security. We believe that by publishing our research including its artifacts under open source licenses, we provide the
|
security. We believe that by publishing our research including its artifacts under open source licenses, we provide the
|
||||||
|
|
@ -51,6 +58,9 @@ directions that we consider worthwhile for future investigation.
|
||||||
long bearing life is challenging at the high rotation speed necessary at a small overall diameter. Finally, at high
|
long bearing life is challenging at the high rotation speed necessary at a small overall diameter. Finally, at high
|
||||||
speeds, precisely balancing the whole assembly to avoid vibrations that could lead to early mechanical failure is
|
speeds, precisely balancing the whole assembly to avoid vibrations that could lead to early mechanical failure is
|
||||||
difficult.
|
difficult.
|
||||||
|
\item Tackling motor control algorithms for IHSMs and developing tamper sensors based on counter-electromotive force as
|
||||||
|
a defense-in-depth measure.
|
||||||
|
\item Integrating the IHSM hardware concept with software research on secure enclave and cryptographic coprocessors.
|
||||||
\item Exploring IHSM applications beyond what we outlined in this thesis. For instance, one application of recent
|
\item Exploring IHSM applications beyond what we outlined in this thesis. For instance, one application of recent
|
||||||
interests would be physically securing GPUs used for AI training. The background for such work could be either
|
interests would be physically securing GPUs used for AI training. The background for such work could be either
|
||||||
export control motivations, or a concern for security and privacy of user input, training data, or even trained
|
export control motivations, or a concern for security and privacy of user input, training data, or even trained
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -7,39 +7,41 @@
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\chaptertitle{The German ePA: A Motivating Counter-Example}
|
\chaptertitle{The German ePA: A Motivating Counter-Example}
|
||||||
|
\label{chapter-epa}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\todo{FIXME: Proper citation here}
|
\todo{FIXME: Proper citation here}
|
||||||
\sourceattrib{This part is based on a short paper written by me and presented by me at the HS3 workshop at ESORICS
|
\sourceattrib{This part is based on a short paper written by Jan Sebastian Götte and presented by Jan Sebastian Götte at
|
||||||
2025.}
|
the HS3 workshop at ESORICS 2025~\cite{gotteGermanyRollingOut2026}.}
|
||||||
Looking at the landscape of computer security solutions, we are presented with a wide variety of vendors and products
|
Looking at the landscape of computer security solutions, we are presented with a wide variety of vendors and products
|
||||||
that may give the impression that hardware security is a solved problem. Vendors sell various claims rangning from
|
that may give the impression that hardware security is a solved problem. Vendors sell various claims rangning from
|
||||||
\emph{You don't need hardware security, just do it in the cloud!}~\cite{
|
\emph{``You don't need hardware security, just do it in the cloud!''}~\cite{
|
||||||
utimacoWhatCloudHSM2025,
|
utimacoWhatCloudHSM2025,
|
||||||
microsoftOverviewAzureCloud,
|
microsoftOverviewAzureCloud,
|
||||||
ibmCloudHSM2016,
|
ibmCloudHSM2016,
|
||||||
amazonAWSCloudHSM,
|
amazonAWSCloudHSM,
|
||||||
googleCloudHSMCloud2025,
|
googleCloudHSMCloud2025,
|
||||||
WhatCloudHSM}
|
WhatCloudHSM}
|
||||||
to \emph{Buy our HSM and you will be secure!}~\cite{utimacoUseCases,thalesLunaNetworkHardware}. In
|
to \emph{``Buy our HSM and you will be secure!''}~\cite{utimacoUseCases,thalesLunaNetworkHardware}. In
|
||||||
practice, things are not as easy and even well-intentioned projects still often go awry on the hardware security
|
practice, things are not as easy and even well-intentioned projects still often go awry on the hardware security
|
||||||
dimension. To motivate our research into physical security in this thesis, in this chapter we will have a look at one
|
dimension. To motivate our research into physical security in this thesis, in this chapter we will have a look at one
|
||||||
such project that was done by capable people with the best intentions, yet it resulted in a hardware security design
|
such project that was done by capable people with the best intentions, yet it resulted in a hardware security design
|
||||||
that is dangerously inadequate for the purpose.
|
that is dangerously inadequate for the purpose.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Beginning May 2025, after several delays, Germany has started the nation-scale rollout of its new electronic medical
|
Beginning May 2025, after several delays, Germany has started the nation-scale rollout of its new electronic medical
|
||||||
record system, named ePA (short for \emph{elektronische Patientenakte}, ``electronic patient record''). The system aims
|
record system, named ePA (short for \emph{elektronische Patientenakte}, ``electronic patient
|
||||||
to create a national database accessible to all healthcare providers that holds the complete electronic medical records
|
record'')~\cite{kochNochVieleUnklarheiten2025}. The system aims to create a national database accessible to all
|
||||||
of all publically insured people living in Germany. The system aims to replace paper-based workflows that are
|
healthcare providers that holds the complete electronic medical records of all publically insured people living in
|
||||||
error-prone and lead to healthcare providers often only having access to a subset of patient's medical records. Data in
|
Germany. The system aims to replace paper-based workflows that are error-prone and lead to healthcare providers often
|
||||||
scope for the system includes medical letters, laboratory results, and medical imaging files.
|
only having access to a subset of patient's medical records. Data in scope for the system includes medical letters,
|
||||||
|
laboratory results, and medical imaging files.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Due to Germany's mandatory health insurance laws, the system's user base encompasses the majority of all German
|
Due to Germany's mandatory health insurance laws, the system's user base encompasses the majority of all German
|
||||||
residents. People who have replaced their public health insurance with private insurance as of now are not subject to
|
residents, approximately 90\%. People who have replaced their public health insurance with private insurance as of now
|
||||||
the system. In Germany, by law private health insurance is only available to people from the top 10th percentile of
|
are not subject to the system. In Germany, by law private health insurance is only available to people from the top 10th
|
||||||
household income. This means that the system disproportionally affects people who have low income, creating an equity
|
percentile of household income. This means that the system disproportionally affects people who have low income,
|
||||||
issue. While it is possible to opt out from the use of the new digital record, the process of opting out is difficult.
|
creating an equity issue. While it is possible to opt out from the use of the new digital record, the process of opting
|
||||||
Additionally, the government and health insurance providers have publically depicted the system in a one-sidedly
|
out is difficult. Additionally, the government and health insurance providers have publically depicted the system in a
|
||||||
positive way, meaning that it is unlikely the majority of people subject to the system have a comprehensive
|
one-sidedly positive way, meaning that it is unlikely the majority of people subject to the system have a comprehensive
|
||||||
understanding of the system's benefits and risks that would be necessary for an informed decision.
|
understanding of the system's benefits and risks that would be necessary for an informed decision.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
While there has been loud criticism of the system's security from civil society organizations such as digital rights
|
While there has been loud criticism of the system's security from civil society organizations such as digital rights
|
||||||
|
|
@ -48,7 +50,7 @@ been demonstrated practically, this criticism has largely been ignored by the po
|
||||||
that despite this civil society outrage and the system's large scale, it has received little attention from the academic
|
that despite this civil society outrage and the system's large scale, it has received little attention from the academic
|
||||||
cryptography and information security community.
|
cryptography and information security community.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this chapter, we aim to point out some unconventional cryptographic engineering decisions in the system. In
|
In this chapter, we aim to highlight some unconventional cryptographic engineering decisions in the system. In
|
||||||
particular, we point out that the system's core per-user secrets are kept in a rudimentary key escrow system whose
|
particular, we point out that the system's core per-user secrets are kept in a rudimentary key escrow system whose
|
||||||
security is based on engineering assumptions, not on cryptographic principles. Furthermore, we observe that by
|
security is based on engineering assumptions, not on cryptographic principles. Furthermore, we observe that by
|
||||||
specification, the individual user keys of the system are derived from a per-user cleartext salt based on a system-wide
|
specification, the individual user keys of the system are derived from a per-user cleartext salt based on a system-wide
|
||||||
|
|
@ -60,40 +62,35 @@ long-term secret with only 256 bits of entropy\footnote{
|
||||||
The current standard only requires one escrow service, and drops the entropy requirement of the root keys from 512
|
The current standard only requires one escrow service, and drops the entropy requirement of the root keys from 512
|
||||||
bits to 256 bits. The apparent reason for the long-term nature of these keys is that they are updated manually.
|
bits to 256 bits. The apparent reason for the long-term nature of these keys is that they are updated manually.
|
||||||
}. Finally, we note that according to specification, the only physical security requirement for the protection of this
|
}. Finally, we note that according to specification, the only physical security requirement for the protection of this
|
||||||
highly sensitive secret is a ``hard, opaque potting material'', with no tamper detection and response required. We
|
highly sensitive secret is a ``hard, opaque potting material'', with no tamper detection and response required.
|
||||||
belive that Inertial HSMs provide a path forward for systems like this, enabling physical security in applications that
|
|
||||||
currently rely on insecure, legacy systems. Even if for regulatory reasons a poorly secured conventional HSM without
|
|
||||||
active tamper sensing is chosen, it would be conceivable to construct an IHSM enclosure \emph{around} this conventional
|
|
||||||
HSM, in effect retrofitting the missing active tamper-sensing envelope.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We base our analysis of the ePA on the system's publicly available standards in their latest version as of the writing
|
We base our analysis of the ePA on the system's publicly available standards in their latest version as of the writing
|
||||||
of the paper underlying this chapter in April 2025, describing version 3.0 of the healthcare record system \cite{
|
of the paper underlying this chapter in April 2025, describing version 3.0 of the healthcare record system \cite{
|
||||||
gematikSpezifikationAktensystemEPA2025,
|
gematikSpezifikationAktensystemEPA2025,
|
||||||
gematikUbergreifendeSpezifikationVerwendung2024,
|
gematikUbergreifendeSpezifikationVerwendung2024,
|
||||||
}. We note that the implementation might well deviate from these standards and be more secure---however, with the
|
}. We note that hypothetically, the implementation might deviate from these standards and be more secure. The reference
|
||||||
system's history of flaws, we believe this is unlikely to be the case. The reference implementation provided by the
|
implementation provided by the specification authority \cite{GithubRepositoryERPFD} follows the specified minimum
|
||||||
specification authority \cite{GithubRepositoryERPFD} follows the specified minimum requirements closely. As of now,
|
requirements closely. As of now, there is no meaningful way for either the public or for researchers such as us to
|
||||||
there is no meaningful way for either the public or for researchers such as us to ascertain the concrete implementation
|
ascertain the concrete implementation security of the system.
|
||||||
security of the system.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{The Design of ePA}
|
\section{The Design of ePA}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ePA is embedded into Germany's national public healthcare backend system ``Telematikinfrastruktur'' (TI). TI is a highly
|
ePA is embedded into Germany's national public healthcare backend system ``Telematikinfrastruktur'' (abbreviated TI;
|
||||||
complex system, and a detailed description would exceed the limits of this analysis. Briefly put, TI consists of a
|
German for ``telematics infrastructure''). TI is a highly complex system, and a detailed description would exceed the
|
||||||
shared demilitarized zone (DMZ) that parties like insurance providers and healthcare providers connect to through a VPN.
|
limits of this analysis. Briefly put, TI consists of a shared demilitarized zone (DMZ) that parties like insurance
|
||||||
At the client location, usually an individual doctor's office or a hospital, this VPN connection is terminated by a
|
providers and healthcare providers connect to through a VPN. At the client location, usually an individual doctor's
|
||||||
specialized VPN appliance named ``Konnektor'' that simultaneously acts as a trusted component inside the client network
|
office or a hospital, this VPN connection is terminated by a specialized VPN appliance named ``Konnektor'' that
|
||||||
hosting some software for purposes such as authentication. The Konnektor contains several smart cards that store keys
|
simultaneously acts as a trusted component inside the client network hosting some software for purposes such as
|
||||||
used for authentication. Konnektor devices are offered by several vendors and healthcare providers like doctor's offices
|
authentication. The Konnektor contains several smart cards that store keys used for authentication. Konnektor devices
|
||||||
are indivudally responsible for purchasing and maintaining a Konnektor.
|
are offered by several vendors and healthcare providers like doctor's offices are indivudally responsible for purchasing
|
||||||
|
and maintaining a Konnektor.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% FIXME: Is there a threat/trust model of the system that you could summarise in a few sentences?
|
% FIXME: Is there a threat/trust model of the system that you could summarise in a few sentences?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Every person enrolled in the system as well as every healthcare professional providing services under it is issued an ID
|
Every person enrolled in the system as well as every healthcare professional providing services under it is issued an ID
|
||||||
card that contains a smart card with keys to authenticate towards the central infrastructure. The primary use of these
|
card that contains a smart card with keys to authenticate towards the central infrastructure. The primary use of these
|
||||||
smart cards up to now is that when an enrolled person visits a healthcare provider, they will insert their ID card into
|
smart cards previously was to automatically provide personal information such as name, birth date, address and insurance
|
||||||
a terminal so the healthcare provider can automatically fetch their personal information such as name, birth date,
|
enrollment status when an enrolled person visits a healthcare provider.
|
||||||
address and enrollment status from their insurance provider.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ePA is implemented inside the TI system. Its centralized services are accessed by healthcare providers through the TI's
|
ePA is implemented inside the TI system. Its centralized services are accessed by healthcare providers through the TI's
|
||||||
VPN, and by patients through proxy servers connected to TI's VPN. Patient records are encrypted and decrypted inside
|
VPN, and by patients through proxy servers connected to TI's VPN. Patient records are encrypted and decrypted inside
|
||||||
|
|
@ -103,8 +100,8 @@ approved implementations of this server-side infrastructure.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
With the current version of the specificatoin, the overall architecture of ePA heavily relies on Trusted Execution
|
With the current version of the specificatoin, the overall architecture of ePA heavily relies on Trusted Execution
|
||||||
Environments (TEEs). Data processing on the server side is done in plaintext inside TEEs, with some cryptographic key
|
Environments (TEEs). Data processing on the server side is done in plaintext inside TEEs, with some cryptographic key
|
||||||
management delegated to a Hardware Security Module. While attacks on the TEEs are considered in the system, the HSMs are
|
management delegated to a Hardware Security Module (HSM). While attacks on the TEEs are considered in the system, the
|
||||||
assumed to be perfectly secure, and the system does not include mitigations for a compromised HSM. The primary
|
HSMs are assumed to be perfectly secure, and the system does not include mitigations for a compromised HSM. The primary
|
||||||
motivation for plaintext processing seems to be to enable large-scale data analysis for research purposes without
|
motivation for plaintext processing seems to be to enable large-scale data analysis for research purposes without
|
||||||
requiring consent or cooperation of the people whose records are being
|
requiring consent or cooperation of the people whose records are being
|
||||||
processed~\cite{gematikWhitepaperDatenschutzUnd2025}.
|
processed~\cite{gematikWhitepaperDatenschutzUnd2025}.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -117,23 +114,25 @@ unclear on the exact mechanism of key derivation, in previous versions of the st
|
||||||
random salt, and the healthcare ID number of the enrolled person was used in SHA256-HKDF. The specification requires
|
random salt, and the healthcare ID number of the enrolled person was used in SHA256-HKDF. The specification requires
|
||||||
that a new root key is generated once a year, but as far as we can tell, record key rollover is not done automatically
|
that a new root key is generated once a year, but as far as we can tell, record key rollover is not done automatically
|
||||||
but is only meant to be done when the \emph{user} requests it, and old root keys must be retained forever to ensure old
|
but is only meant to be done when the \emph{user} requests it, and old root keys must be retained forever to ensure old
|
||||||
records can be accessed.
|
records can be accessed. Through this lack of automatic key rollover combined with the need to retain root keys
|
||||||
|
indefinitely, attack surface is maximized and incremental compromises of the system over long time spans become possible.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Related Work}
|
\subsection{Previous Analyses}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The state-owned company specifying the system commissioned several security assessments of the system relating to the
|
\emph{gematik}, the state-owned company specifying the system, commissioned several security assessments of the system
|
||||||
key escrow service. \textcite{fischlinKryptographischeAnalyseSpezifikation2021} focuses on the cryptographic
|
relating to the key escrow service.
|
||||||
dimension of the key escrow service used in an older version of the standard, and is now obsolete.
|
\citeauthor{fischlinKryptographischeAnalyseSpezifikation2021}~\cite{fischlinKryptographischeAnalyseSpezifikation2021}
|
||||||
\textcite{slanySicherheitsanalyseZurSicherheit2020} approaches the system at a higher level, and focuses on the
|
focuses on the cryptographic dimension of the key escrow service used in an older version of the standard, and is now
|
||||||
cryptography of the inner protocol layers spoken between the system's components. Industry research organization
|
obsolete. \textcite{slanySicherheitsanalyseZurSicherheit2020} approaches the system at a higher level, and focuses on
|
||||||
|
the cryptography of the inner protocol layers spoken between the system's components. Industry research organization
|
||||||
Fraunhofer SIT was comissioned for a structured, theoretical assessment of attack paths to the system
|
Fraunhofer SIT was comissioned for a structured, theoretical assessment of attack paths to the system
|
||||||
\cite{fraunhofersitAbschlussberichtSicherheitsanalyseGesamtsystems2024}. We are not currently aware of
|
\cite{fraunhofersitAbschlussberichtSicherheitsanalyseGesamtsystems2024}. We are not currently aware of independent
|
||||||
independent academic security research on the system.
|
academic security research on the system.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The design and operation of the system have been independently described in detail by civil society activists, who have
|
The design and operation of the system have been independently described in detail by civil society activists, who have
|
||||||
demonstrated several successful attacks on the system. \textcite{tschirsichHackerHinOder0100} demonstrated how they
|
demonstrated several successful attacks on the system. \textcite{tschirsichHackerHinOder2019} demonstrated how they
|
||||||
could trivially acquire each of the smartcards as well as the Konnektor necessary for accessing the system.
|
could trivially acquire each of the smartcards as well as the Konnektor necessary for accessing the system.
|
||||||
\textcite{tschirsichKonnteBisherNoch0100} summarize the history of attacks demonstrated on the system and show multiple
|
\textcite{tschirsichKonnteBisherNoch2024} summarize the history of attacks demonstrated on the system and show multiple
|
||||||
practical attacks on various parts of the system's implementation.
|
practical attacks on various parts of the system's implementation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Concerning Cryptographic Engineering Choices}
|
\section{Concerning Cryptographic Engineering Choices}
|
||||||
|
|
@ -143,11 +142,11 @@ by no means an exhaustive list, and is only meant to underscore why we believe t
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Use of Key Escrow}
|
\subsection{Use of Key Escrow}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
First, the system's general approach of using a key escrow service instead of securely storing the keys inside the
|
Key escrow describes a concept that was originally devised during the 1990ies out of a fear that the widespread
|
||||||
system's already existing smart card infrastructure is concerning, given that this key escrow service poses a
|
availability of strong encryption would stifle the ability of law enforcement agencies to wiretap communications in the
|
||||||
centralized security risk. The system's designers made this decision since it was deemed important that access to an
|
prosecution of crime. At the core of the concept rests the idea that a trusted \emph{key escrow} service should hold a
|
||||||
encrypted record can be restored quickly after an insurance ID card is lost, without requiring the cooperation of the
|
copy of every private key in use. In case the government wants to access one of these keys, the key escrow service can
|
||||||
healthcare providers holding the primary copies of the person's medical records.
|
provide this access\textcite{andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020,jarvisCryptoWarsFight2020}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
While key escrow services have been a topic of political debate in decades past, in the cryptographic community,
|
While key escrow services have been a topic of political debate in decades past, in the cryptographic community,
|
||||||
consensus generally is that they are a bad idea since they pose a centralized target for attack, and increase attack
|
consensus generally is that they are a bad idea since they pose a centralized target for attack, and increase attack
|
||||||
|
|
@ -158,8 +157,16 @@ surface \cite{
|
||||||
rogawayMoralCharacterCryptographic2015,
|
rogawayMoralCharacterCryptographic2015,
|
||||||
}.
|
}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Our first concern is the system's general approach of using a key escrow service instead of securely storing the keys
|
||||||
|
inside the system's already existing smart card infrastructure. Like any other key escrow system, this key escrow
|
||||||
|
service poses a centralized security risk. The system's designers made this decision since it was considered important
|
||||||
|
that when an encrypted record must be restored after an insurance ID card is lost, it can be re-created without the
|
||||||
|
cooperation of the healthcare providers holding the primary copies of the person's medical records.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Cryptographic Design}
|
\subsection{Cryptographic Design}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\todo{Feedback from HS3 reviewer: I feel that this section is a mix-up of critique on the cryptographic design and the
|
||||||
|
approach to privacy protection and data minimisation. How are they linked? I'm missing some discussion here.}
|
||||||
The system's overall cryptographic design is intentionally kept simple. The standard explicitly mentions that symmetric
|
The system's overall cryptographic design is intentionally kept simple. The standard explicitly mentions that symmetric
|
||||||
primitives have been preferred over asymmetric primitives in the core key escrow functions due to the risk of an attack
|
primitives have been preferred over asymmetric primitives in the core key escrow functions due to the risk of an attack
|
||||||
on asymmetric primitives in the long term. Notably, other advanced cryptographic techniques such as secret sharing
|
on asymmetric primitives in the long term. Notably, other advanced cryptographic techniques such as secret sharing
|
||||||
|
|
@ -174,28 +181,25 @@ For instance, the system leaks a person's insurance ID number to the key escrow
|
||||||
requested. Along with the timing and frequency of these requests, this leaks information on the person's condition to
|
requested. Along with the timing and frequency of these requests, this leaks information on the person's condition to
|
||||||
the key escrow service in an identifiable way.
|
the key escrow service in an identifiable way.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% TODO I feel that this section is a mix-up of critique on the cryptographic design and the approach to privacy
|
|
||||||
% protection and data minimisation. How are they linked? I'm missing some discussion here.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{A Realistic Attacker Model}
|
\subsection{A Realistic Attacker Model}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We observe that the system as a whole does not appear to be designed to defend against well-resourced adversaries. The
|
We observe that the system as a whole does not appear to be designed to defend against well-resourced adversaries. A
|
||||||
series of practical attacks that have been demonstrated on the system confirm this impression. In
|
series of demonstrated practical attacks on the system, none of which required advanced capabilities, confirm this
|
||||||
\textcite{tschirsichKonnteBisherNoch0100} summarize a series of successful attacks. Attacks include social engineering
|
impression. In \textcite{tschirsichKonnteBisherNoch2024} summarize a series of successful attacks. Attacks include
|
||||||
resulting in access to copies of smartcards enabling accessing patient records, using misconfigured Konnektor VPN
|
social engineering resulting in access to copies of smartcards enabling accessing patient records, using misconfigured
|
||||||
appliances with their LAN DMZ and authentication interface exposed on the public internet, circumventing video-based
|
Konnektor VPN appliances with their local network DMZ and authentication interface exposed on the public internet,
|
||||||
authentication processes resulting in duplicate file keys being provided, classis SQL injection on a backend service
|
circumventing video-based authentication processes resulting in duplicate file keys being provided, classis SQL
|
||||||
maintaining an authentication database, accessing all national patient records through brute-force enumeration of weak
|
injection on a backend service maintaining an authentication database, accessing all national patient records through
|
||||||
identifiers, and several more.
|
brute-force enumeration of weak identifiers, and several more.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We believe that a system like this must be designed to withstand well-resourced adversaries such as enemy secret
|
We believe that a system like this must be designed to withstand well-resourced adversaries such as foreign secret
|
||||||
services, since the medical data stored in such as information on chronic illness, sexually transmittable disease or
|
services, since the medical data stored in such as information on chronic illness, sexually transmittable disease or
|
||||||
severe food allergies has intelligence value. Repeated breaches of national digital infrastructure such as the 2015
|
severe food allergies has intelligence value. Repeated breaches of national digital infrastructure such as the 2015
|
||||||
breach of the US Office of Personnel Management \cite{barrettUSSuspectsHackers2015} or the 2024 compromise of US
|
breach of the US Office of Personnel Management \cite{barrettUSSuspectsHackers2015} or the 2024 compromise of US
|
||||||
telecommunications wiretapping systems \cite{mennChineseGovernmentHackers2024} demonstrate that such state-sponsored
|
telecommunications wiretapping systems \cite{mennChineseGovernmentHackers2024} demonstrate that such state-sponsored
|
||||||
attacks on national digital infrastructure are a realistic concern. A possible scenario in the ePA system would be an
|
attacks on national digital infrastructure are a realistic concern. A possible scenario in the ePA system would be an
|
||||||
enemy secret service gaining access to one of the HSMs storing the systems' root secrets, extracting the root secret by
|
foreign secret service gaining access to one of the HSMs storing the systems' root secrets, extracting the root secret
|
||||||
an advanced physical attack, then being able to decrypt captured encrypted health records at will. Similarly, a
|
by an advanced physical attack, then being able to decrypt captured encrypted health records at will. Similarly, a
|
||||||
nation-state adversary might have access to an exploit allowing the compromise of the system's TEEs, which would enable
|
nation-state adversary might have access to an exploit allowing the compromise of the system's TEEs, which would enable
|
||||||
the extraction of any patient records being processed in plaintext inside these TEEs.
|
the extraction of any patient records being processed in plaintext inside these TEEs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -203,19 +207,20 @@ the extraction of any patient records being processed in plaintext inside these
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Physical security has received some consideration in the system's specification. First, smart cards are used extensively
|
Physical security has received some consideration in the system's specification. First, smart cards are used extensively
|
||||||
for authentication. Second, Hardware Security Modules are used in key locations of the system to process some
|
for authentication. Second, Hardware Security Modules are used in key locations of the system to process some
|
||||||
cryptographic secrets. The core of the system's key escrow service is implemented inside an HSM. However, it is notable
|
cryptographic secrets. The core of the system's key escrow service is implemented inside an HSM that is part of a
|
||||||
that the actual security level required for this HSM is only FIPS 140-2 level 3
|
redundant HSM cluster. However, it is notable that the actual security level required for this HSM is only FIPS 140-2
|
||||||
\cite{usnationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnologySecurityRequirementsCryptographic2002}. FIPS 140-2 is a US government
|
level 3 \cite{usnationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnologySecurityRequirementsCryptographic2002}. FIPS 140-2 is a US
|
||||||
standard that used to be popular for the specification of HSMs. However, not only has FIPS 140-2 been superseded by FIPS
|
government standard that used to be popular for the specification of HSMs. However, not only has FIPS 140-2 been made
|
||||||
140-3 since 2019 \cite{usnationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnologySecurityRequirementsCryptographic2019}, its security
|
obsolete by FIPS 140-3 in 2019 \cite{usnationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnologySecurityRequirementsCryptographic2019},
|
||||||
level 3 mostly provides logical separation of cryptographic functions from other logic and is not very meaningful in the
|
its security level 3 mostly provides logical separation of cryptographic functions from other logic and is not very
|
||||||
context of physical attacks. The only physical requirement of FIPS 140-2 level 3 is that the HSM has a hard, opaque
|
meaningful in the context of physical attacks. The only physical requirement of FIPS 140-2 level 3 is that the HSM has a
|
||||||
coating. This coating is specified to be tamper-evident, but notably no active tamper detection or response features are
|
hard, opaque coating. This coating is specified to be tamper-evident, but notably no active tamper detection or response
|
||||||
required by this standard~\cite{andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020}. In contrast to the newer FIPS 140-3 standard and
|
features are required by this standard~\cite{andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020}. In contrast to the newer FIPS 140-3
|
||||||
the related ISO/IEC 19790 \cite{ISOIEC19790} as well as ISO/IEC 24759 \cite{ISOIEC24759} standards, FIPS 140-2 does not
|
standard and the related ISO/IEC 19790 \cite{ISOIEC19790} as well as ISO/IEC 24759 \cite{ISOIEC24759} standards, FIPS
|
||||||
make any particular requirements regarding resistance to side-channel attacks. The lack of tamper response, unspecified
|
140-2 does not make any particular requirements regarding resistance to side-channel attacks. The lack of tamper
|
||||||
resistance to side-channel attacks and the fact that the ePA specification only requires the long-lived key escrow root
|
response, unspecified resistance to side-channel attacks and the fact that the ePA specification only requires the
|
||||||
key inside the HSM to have 256 bits of entropy lead to an unsatisfactory overall constellation.
|
long-lived key escrow root key inside the HSM to have 256 bits of entropy lead to an unsatisfactory overall
|
||||||
|
constellation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Conclusion}
|
\section{Conclusion}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -242,5 +247,7 @@ that better accomodate real-world use cases.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We believe that Inertial HSMs can address this use case by cleanly separating the physical security primitive into a
|
We believe that Inertial HSMs can address this use case by cleanly separating the physical security primitive into a
|
||||||
retargetable design that can be applied to entire servers if needed, and augment or replace technology like conventional
|
retargetable design that can be applied to entire servers if needed, and augment or replace technology like conventional
|
||||||
HSMs or trusted execution environments to provide high-level hardware security.
|
HSMs or trusted execution environments to provide high-level hardware security. Before introducing IHSMs in
|
||||||
|
Chapter~\ref{chapter-ihsm}, in the following chapter, we will first complement this chapter's outlook on the state of
|
||||||
|
the art in hardware security with a survey of tamper sensing meshes in a wide range of real world devices.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ being used in the late 19\textsuperscript{th} century, around the widespread com
|
||||||
active tamper sensing meshes are used in a wide array of devices ranging from card payment terminals to atomic bombs.
|
active tamper sensing meshes are used in a wide array of devices ranging from card payment terminals to atomic bombs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this chapter, we will start with a brief history of tamper sensing meshes. Complementing our historical analysis, we
|
In this chapter, we will start with a brief history of tamper sensing meshes. Complementing our historical analysis, we
|
||||||
will present the results of a survey of a range of real-world devices that use tamper sensing meshes and we will analyze
|
will present the results of a survey of a range of real-world devices that use tamper sensing meshes and we will examine
|
||||||
their implementation. We will analyze the gaps left by the current state of the art in commercial practice, and evaluate
|
their implementation. We will analyze the gaps left by the current state of the art in commercial practice, and evaluate
|
||||||
how Inertial HSMs could close these gaps to make secure hardware accessible to a wider range of applications. The
|
how Inertial HSMs could close these gaps to make secure hardware accessible to a wider range of applications. The
|
||||||
contributions in this chapter are as follows:
|
contributions in this chapter are as follows:
|
||||||
|
|
@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ contributions in this chapter are as follows:
|
||||||
illustrating them.
|
illustrating them.
|
||||||
\item From our sample, we extract several design patterns that can be applied to increase the security of a design.
|
\item From our sample, we extract several design patterns that can be applied to increase the security of a design.
|
||||||
\item We note security flaws in several of our samples.
|
\item We note security flaws in several of our samples.
|
||||||
\item We provide the results of CT measurements of multiple samples, and we evaluate their impact on tamper sensing
|
\item We provide the results of Computed Tomography (CT) imaging of multiple samples, and we evaluate their impact
|
||||||
mesh security.
|
on tamper sensing mesh security.
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{The History of Tamper Sensing Meshes}
|
\section{The History of Tamper Sensing Meshes}
|
||||||
|
|
@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ the widespread adoption of cryptography in commercial applications~\cite{
|
||||||
One early practical uses of tamper sensing meshes for information security as opposed to the security of some physical
|
One early practical uses of tamper sensing meshes for information security as opposed to the security of some physical
|
||||||
good is documented in notes on a series of lectures given by Dr.~David~G. Boak, a specialist in communications security
|
good is documented in notes on a series of lectures given by Dr.~David~G. Boak, a specialist in communications security
|
||||||
and signal intelligence at the US National Security
|
and signal intelligence at the US National Security
|
||||||
Agency~\cite{nsaHistoryUSCommunications1973,nsaHistoryUSCommunications1981}. In this lecture series, Boak mentions that
|
Agency~\cite{boakHistoryUSCommunications1981,boakHistoryUSCommunications1973}. In this lecture series, Boak mentions
|
||||||
around World War \RN{2}, the US became concerned about the security of their ciphering machines, which at the time were
|
that around World War \RN{2}, the US became concerned about the security of their ciphering machines, which at the time
|
||||||
large, fridge-sized electro-mechanical contraptions. Initially, simple safes were used to protect those
|
were large, fridge-sized electro-mechanical contraptions. Initially, simple safes were used to protect those
|
||||||
devices---however, as Boak notes, the US was well aware that they could not build a safe that a well-equipped specialist
|
devices---however, as Boak notes, the US was well aware that they could not build a safe that a well-equipped specialist
|
||||||
could not break open within an hour. As a solution, the NSA started development on what we would today call a Hardware
|
could not break open within an hour. As a solution, the NSA started development on what we would today call a Hardware
|
||||||
Security Module by encapsulating a crypto coprocessor in a tamper sensing envelope. Boak observes that as a tamper
|
Security Module by encapsulating a crypto coprocessor in a tamper sensing envelope. Boak observes that as a tamper
|
||||||
|
|
@ -111,24 +111,29 @@ history of nuclear material passing through these facilities.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
When using sensors to monitor treaty compliance, the IAEA has to consider the possibility of a host state tampering with
|
When using sensors to monitor treaty compliance, the IAEA has to consider the possibility of a host state tampering with
|
||||||
its sensors to abuse nuclear material without being noticed. Historically, the IAEA has responded to this threat by the
|
its sensors to abuse nuclear material without being noticed. Historically, the IAEA has responded to this threat by the
|
||||||
extensive use of tamper-indicating enclosures and of seals. In both systems, the approach taken is that the enclosure or
|
extensive use of tamper-indicating enclosures and of seals\footnote{
|
||||||
seal is treated similarly to what these days, in computing we call a Physically Uncloneable Function. The enclosure or
|
Note that in IAEA terminology, both tamper detection and tamper evidence are combined into the term ``tamper
|
||||||
seal is manufactured in a process that leaves an unpredictable and uncontrollable pattern of manufacturing variations
|
indication''. The IAEA distinguishes between active tamper indication, which we conventionally call tamper
|
||||||
such as surface imperfections. A process used in the IAEA is to package devices in aluminium enclosures passivated in a
|
detection, and passive tamper indication, which we conventionally call tamper evidence. Tamper indicating devices
|
||||||
bright color, which leaves a random, microscopic pattern of pits in the surface from the etching step. Before such a
|
include seals, but also the aforementioned uniquely characterizable enclosures, which IAEA terminology calls
|
||||||
device is deployed in the field, it is precisely measured from all sides. Later on, after field deployment, its
|
intrinsically tamper-indicating. An example for an active tamper indicating device would be a seismic sensor at the
|
||||||
integrity can then be checked by comparing its current state to these initial measurements. The underlying assumption is
|
bottom of a borehole that has been back-filled with concrete such that any attempt to reach the sensor would be
|
||||||
that drilling or cutting into something like a metal enclosure will leave detectable traces, and that perfectly
|
well-visible in the sensor's own readings~\cite{simmonsHowInsureThat1988}.
|
||||||
replicating an object including features such as minute surface imperfections is infeasible even to a nation
|
}. In both systems, the approach taken is that the enclosure or seal is treated similarly to what these days, in
|
||||||
state~\cite{iaea2011}.
|
computing we call a Physical Unclonable Function (PUF). The concept of a PUF centers on electronic component
|
||||||
|
manufactured such that random manufacturing variations can later be measured by the finished circuit. The core idea is
|
||||||
|
that since these manufacturing variations are random, they can be used as a source for cryptographic entropy.
|
||||||
|
Furthermore, the concept is based on the assumption that these manufacturing variations cannot be controlled, hence
|
||||||
|
making the device \emph{unclonable}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In IAEA terminology, both tamper detection and tamper evidence are combined into the term ``tamper indication''. The
|
Similar to a PUF, in the IAEA's application an enclosure or seal is manufactured in a process that leaves an
|
||||||
IAEA distinguishes between active tamper indication, which we conventionally call tamper detection, and passive tamper
|
unpredictable and uncontrollable pattern of manufacturing variations such as surface imperfections. A process used in
|
||||||
indication, which we conventionally call tamper evidence. Tamper indicating devices include seals, but also the
|
the IAEA is to package devices in aluminium enclosures passivated in a bright color, which leaves a random, microscopic
|
||||||
aforementioned uniquely characterizable enclosures, which IAEA terminology calls intrinsically tamper-indicating. An
|
pattern of pits in the surface from the etching step. Before such a device is deployed in the field, it is precisely
|
||||||
example for an active tamper indicating device would be a seismic sensor at the bottom of a borehole that has been
|
measured from all sides. Later on, after field deployment, its integrity can then be checked by comparing its current
|
||||||
back-filled with concrete such that any attempt to reach the sensor would be well-visible in the sensor's own
|
state to these initial measurements. The underlying assumption is that drilling or cutting into something like a metal
|
||||||
readings~\cite{simmonsHowInsureThat1988}.
|
enclosure will leave detectable traces, and that perfectly replicating an object including features such as minute
|
||||||
|
surface imperfections is infeasible even to a nation state~\cite{iaea2011}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
With smarter electronics becoming more affordable in both monetary and in power budget, over the decades, other active
|
With smarter electronics becoming more affordable in both monetary and in power budget, over the decades, other active
|
||||||
tamper sensors have received attention as well. The IAEA reports on attempts at burying sensors such as piezoelectric
|
tamper sensors have received attention as well. The IAEA reports on attempts at burying sensors such as piezoelectric
|
||||||
|
|
@ -148,12 +153,12 @@ and ATMs to the ATM pin pads themselves, which encrypt the customer's PIN right
|
||||||
of card payment terminals.
|
of card payment terminals.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
HSMs are used for highly sensitive operations even outside of the financial industry, although their adoption is
|
HSMs are used for highly sensitive operations even outside of the financial industry, although their adoption is
|
||||||
hampered by their high cost. These applications include key management in the TLS certificate infrastructure. In this
|
hampered by their high cost. In this chapter, we will analyze a commercial HSM that was used in the key management
|
||||||
chapter, we will analyze a commercial HSM that was used in the key management infrastructure of a premium TV provider.
|
infrastructure of a premium TV provider as one example of such uses. Examples of other applications include mail
|
||||||
Other applications include mail franking machines, where they are used to protect the credit counter and franking data,
|
franking machines, where they are used to protect the credit counter and franking data, with one such unit analyzed in
|
||||||
with one such unit analyzed in this chapter. Furthermore, we have identified several models of key safes that in Germany
|
this chapter. Furthermore, we have identified several models of key safes that in Germany are mounted externally on
|
||||||
are mounted externally on public buildings to provide keys to emergency services, and which include tamper sensing
|
public buildings to provide keys to emergency services, and which include tamper sensing meshes on their door and
|
||||||
meshes on their door and interior walls to detect attempts at drilling into them~\cite{SD04203RB25D5,
|
interior walls to detect attempts at drilling into them~\cite{SD04203RB25D5,
|
||||||
krusesicherheitssystemeDatenblattKRUSEFWSchlusseldepot2018}. Finally, we have found a processing unit used in a series
|
krusesicherheitssystemeDatenblattKRUSEFWSchlusseldepot2018}. Finally, we have found a processing unit used in a series
|
||||||
of mid-2000s era slot machines in Germany that includes a tamper sensing mesh, presumably to prevent modification or
|
of mid-2000s era slot machines in Germany that includes a tamper sensing mesh, presumably to prevent modification or
|
||||||
cloning. This device will also be analyzed later in this chapter.
|
cloning. This device will also be analyzed later in this chapter.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -196,6 +201,13 @@ basic construction and layout has not changed much since the early 1990ies~\cite
|
||||||
macphersonImprovementsSecurityEnclosures1993,
|
macphersonImprovementsSecurityEnclosures1993,
|
||||||
macphersonTamperRespondentEnclosure1999}.
|
macphersonTamperRespondentEnclosure1999}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Concluding this brief history of tamper sensing meshes, we find that they were initially developed for sensitive
|
||||||
|
military applications, and their use in civil applications is a recent phenomenon. The implementation of tamper sensing
|
||||||
|
meshes in civil applications was likely catalyzed by two advancements in electronics. First, electronic components
|
||||||
|
became less expensive and more integrated reducing the cost overhead of tamper sensing circuits. Second, the mass-scale
|
||||||
|
adoption of PCB and FPC production processes enabled their use as inexpensive, high-resolution substrates for such
|
||||||
|
meshes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Monitoring Circuit Approaches}
|
\subsection{Monitoring Circuit Approaches}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Tamper sensing meshes are most effective when they are continuously monitored using a backup power supply while the rest
|
Tamper sensing meshes are most effective when they are continuously monitored using a backup power supply while the rest
|
||||||
|
|
@ -213,7 +225,7 @@ To achieve low power consumption, a popular technique known since at least
|
||||||
1902~\cite{suttonElectricallyprotectedStructure1902} and still used
|
1902~\cite{suttonElectricallyprotectedStructure1902} and still used
|
||||||
today~\cite{cesanaTamperResistantCard2001,razaghiCircuitBoardHold2019} is to measure the deviation of the mesh's
|
today~\cite{cesanaTamperResistantCard2001,razaghiCircuitBoardHold2019} is to measure the deviation of the mesh's
|
||||||
end-to-end ohmic resistance from its baseline value. This measurement can be implemented either by directly comparing a
|
end-to-end ohmic resistance from its baseline value. This measurement can be implemented either by directly comparing a
|
||||||
mesh trace's resistance with a reference resistor, or using a wheatstone bridge. Bridge circuits were already used
|
mesh trace's resistance with a reference resistor, or using a Wheatstone bridge. Bridge circuits were already used
|
||||||
in early tamper sensing mesh implementations~\cite{
|
in early tamper sensing mesh implementations~\cite{
|
||||||
ElektrischeSicherheitseinrichtungSchutze1932,
|
ElektrischeSicherheitseinrichtungSchutze1932,
|
||||||
hamPrintedcircuitTypeSecurity1971,
|
hamPrintedcircuitTypeSecurity1971,
|
||||||
|
|
@ -225,34 +237,29 @@ in early tamper sensing mesh implementations~\cite{
|
||||||
Besides tamper sensing meshes, environmental sensors such as temperature or light sensors are frequently used as a
|
Besides tamper sensing meshes, environmental sensors such as temperature or light sensors are frequently used as a
|
||||||
secondary line of defence in HSMs and similar devices. By placing such sensors in the device and verifying the device is
|
secondary line of defence in HSMs and similar devices. By placing such sensors in the device and verifying the device is
|
||||||
within its nominal operating environment, tampering can be made less convenient. Modern security standards often mandate
|
within its nominal operating environment, tampering can be made less convenient. Modern security standards often mandate
|
||||||
the implementation of at least a temperature sensor to prevent cold-boot attacks on a device. A multitude of other
|
the implementation of at least a temperature sensor to prevent cold-boot attacks on a device~\cite{
|
||||||
sensors have been proposed, including humidity sensors, vibration sensors, light sensors, magnetometers, and radiation
|
usnationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnologySecurityRequirementsCryptographic2019,
|
||||||
sensors such as X-ray sensors have been proposed. While the implementation cost of most sensor types is low, each
|
ISOIEC19790}.
|
||||||
additional environmental sensor comes with an increased false alarm rate. Anecdotally, we have heard of light sensors
|
A multitude of other sensors have been proposed, including vibration sensors, light sensors,
|
||||||
being removed from a datacenter HSM product because they caused frequent false alarms despite extensive efforts like
|
magnetometers, and radiation sensors such as X-ray sensors have been proposed. While the implementation cost of most
|
||||||
custom injection-molded plastic light baffles at all air vents of the device designed to prevent ingress of outside
|
sensor types is low, each additional environmental sensor comes with an increased false alarm
|
||||||
light.
|
rate~\cite{andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020}.
|
||||||
% FIXME citations?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{A Survey of Meshes in the Wild}
|
\section{A Survey of Meshes in the Wild}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Concluding the brief history of tamper sensing meshes above, we find that they were initially developed for sensitive
|
In this section, we will examine a large sample of recent devices that include tamper sensing meshes to gain an
|
||||||
military applications, and their use in civil applications is a recent phenomenon. The implementation of tamper sensing
|
|
||||||
meshes in civil applications was likely catalyzed by two advancements in electronics. First, electronic components
|
|
||||||
became less expensive and more integrated reducing the cost overhead of tamper sensing circuits. Second, the mass-scale
|
|
||||||
adoption of PCB and FPC production processes enabled their use as inexpensive, high-resolution substrates for such
|
|
||||||
meshes. In this section, we will examine a large sample of recent devices that include tamper sensing meshes to gain an
|
|
||||||
understanding of how they are implemented, and what security level they are targeted towards. Since we were unable to
|
understanding of how they are implemented, and what security level they are targeted towards. Since we were unable to
|
||||||
acquire a nuclear weapon for our research, we limited our survey to commercial devices with a focus on card payment
|
acquire a nuclear weapon for our research, we limited our survey to commercial devices. While we analyzed devices across
|
||||||
terminals, which represent the most varied class of device incorporating such meshes.
|
a broad spectrum of applications, our survey includes a large variety of card payment terminals, which represent the
|
||||||
|
most varied class of device incorporating such meshes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Specimen Selection}
|
\subsection{Specimen Selection}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Given their niche applications and high cost, devices incorporating tamper sensing meshes tend to be hard to find. For
|
Given their niche applications and high cost, devices incorporating tamper sensing meshes tend to be hard to find. For
|
||||||
this survey, we chose 30 total devices including 23 different models of card payment terminals, and 7 other devices.
|
this survey, we chose 30 total devices including 23 different models of card payment terminals, and 7 other devices.
|
||||||
Some devices were procured by dumpster diving, while most were sourced from ebay. The majority of these were sold by
|
Some devices were procured by intercepting electronic waste, while most were sourced from ebay in Februrary and March
|
||||||
electronic waste recycling companies. A complete list of our specimens can be found in
|
2025. The majority of these were sold by electronic waste recycling companies. A complete list of our specimens can be
|
||||||
Table~\ref{tab_hsm_survey_sample_list}. External photos of each device are shown in
|
found in Table~\ref{tab_hsm_survey_sample_list}. External photos of each device are shown in
|
||||||
Figure~\ref{fig_hsm_survey_sample_pics} and internal photos are shown in
|
Figure~\ref{fig_hsm_survey_sample_pics} and internal photos are shown in
|
||||||
Figure~\ref{fig_hsm_survey_sample_internal_pics}. In the following sections, we will go into detail on the classes of
|
Figure~\ref{fig_hsm_survey_sample_internal_pics}. In the following sections, we will go into detail on the classes of
|
||||||
devices we selected for this study.
|
devices we selected for this study.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -353,12 +360,11 @@ skimming that aim to exfiltrate card data and PINs entered by the customer. The
|
||||||
Council (PCI SSC), an association of all major western credit card network operators assumes the role of the de-facto
|
Council (PCI SSC), an association of all major western credit card network operators assumes the role of the de-facto
|
||||||
standardization organization in the card payment space. Due to the international scale of the large credit card
|
standardization organization in the card payment space. Due to the international scale of the large credit card
|
||||||
networks, almost all payment terminals on the market irrespective of their country of origin are certified under PCI SSC
|
networks, almost all payment terminals on the market irrespective of their country of origin are certified under PCI SSC
|
||||||
standards. Adding on to PCI's ecosystem impact, its security standards are thought out well and provide a higher level
|
standards. Adding on to PCI's ecosystem impact, its security standards are thought out well.
|
||||||
of security than one might expect from an industry association.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
One reason for the high level of physical security standards in card payment applications both on the client side
|
One reason for the high level of physical security standards in card payment applications both on the client side
|
||||||
(payment terminals) and on the server side (HSM appliances) is that the finance industry has been reluctant to adopt
|
(payment terminals) and on the server side (HSM appliances) is that the finance industry has been reluctant to adopt
|
||||||
modern cryptography. Not only are modern cryptographic protocols like Secure Multiparty Computation (SMPC) or
|
modern cryptography. Not only are modern cryptographic protocols like secure Multiparty Computation (MPC) or
|
||||||
Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) not commonly used. Even asymmetric cryptography has only been adopted reluctantly, and
|
Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) not commonly used. Even asymmetric cryptography has only been adopted reluctantly, and
|
||||||
ancient ciphers such as Triple DES are still commonly referenced in industry
|
ancient ciphers such as Triple DES are still commonly referenced in industry
|
||||||
standards~\cite{pcisecuritystandardscouncilPaymentCardIndustry2025}. As a result, increased hardware security is
|
standards~\cite{pcisecuritystandardscouncilPaymentCardIndustry2025}. As a result, increased hardware security is
|
||||||
|
|
@ -373,19 +379,19 @@ terminals are cost-sensitive devices, which is reflected in the construction of
|
||||||
When credit card payments are handled on the web as opposed to in a physical store, HSMs are used in data centers to
|
When credit card payments are handled on the web as opposed to in a physical store, HSMs are used in data centers to
|
||||||
handle plaintext payment data such as credit card numbers. Such HSM appliances are usually standalone rackmount devices
|
handle plaintext payment data such as credit card numbers. Such HSM appliances are usually standalone rackmount devices
|
||||||
and are used across application domains. Depending on the application, these HSMs can be programmed with custom code, or
|
and are used across application domains. Depending on the application, these HSMs can be programmed with custom code, or
|
||||||
can be used as coprocessors through an API. In practice, the standalone appliances are just low-end computers in a
|
can be used as coprocessors through an API~\cite{LunaNetworkHSM}. In practice, the standalone appliances are just
|
||||||
rackmount enclosure that expose the API of an internal HSM add-in card to the network. In this survey, we obtained two
|
low-end computers in a rackmount enclosure that expose the API of an internal HSM add-in card to the network. In this
|
||||||
devices labelled as HSMs. We were only able to procure two such devices since they are expensive, and even used
|
survey, we obtained two devices labelled as HSMs. We were only able to procure two such devices since they are
|
||||||
specimens of older models are usually listed for several hundreds to several thousands of EUR. Unfortunately, one of the
|
expensive, and we found that even used specimens of older models are usually listed for several hundreds to several
|
||||||
devices we obtained did not contain any security meshes in its case, and thus would not provide adequate protection
|
thousands of Euro. Unfortunately, one of the devices we obtained did not contain any security meshes in its case, and
|
||||||
against advanced attacks. The other specimen we procured was a 2011 model Utimaco CryptoServer LAN. Our unit was a
|
thus would not provide adequate protection against advanced attacks. The other specimen we procured was a 2011 model
|
||||||
white-label variant procured by premium TV encryption technology provider Irdeto, presumably used in Germany to produce
|
Utimaco CryptoServer LAN. Our unit was a white-label variant procured by premium TV encryption technology provider
|
||||||
cryptographic key streams for TV signal encryption. We bought the device from a recycling company specialized on
|
Irdeto, presumably used in Germany to produce cryptographic key streams for TV signal encryption. We bought the device
|
||||||
datacenter components. The device was sold with any HDDs removed. The device consisted of an older mainboard for
|
from a recycling company specialized on datacenter components. The device was sold with any HDDs removed. The device
|
||||||
embedded applications containing an Intel Core 2 Duo-brand processor and 2 GiB of DDR2 RAM, which was connected to the
|
consisted of an older mainboard for embedded applications containing an Intel Core 2 Duo-brand processor and 2 GiB of
|
||||||
HSM add-in card through PCI. The device contained a small Lithium backup battery on the add-in card, and another, larger
|
DDR2 RAM, which was connected to the HSM add-in card through PCI. The device contained a small Lithium backup battery on
|
||||||
battery in an enclosure at the front of the device that was connected to the card through a cable. The device did not
|
the add-in card, and another, larger battery in an enclosure at the front of the device that was connected to the card
|
||||||
contain any obvious case intrusion sensors.
|
through a cable. The device did not contain any obvious case intrusion sensors.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{ATM Encrypting Pin Pads}
|
\subsubsection{ATM Encrypting Pin Pads}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -607,6 +613,7 @@ list, we will address several common structural features that we observed across
|
||||||
\label{hsm_fig_materials}
|
\label{hsm_fig_materials}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\todo{FIXME: Add scale / structure size to photos?}
|
||||||
Regular Printed Circuit Boards are frequently used to implement tamper sensing meshes as shown in
|
Regular Printed Circuit Boards are frequently used to implement tamper sensing meshes as shown in
|
||||||
Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_materials_pcb_rigid}. PCB production is a highly advanced, large-scale industry and PCBs are
|
Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_materials_pcb_rigid}. PCB production is a highly advanced, large-scale industry and PCBs are
|
||||||
inexpensive, commodity products. PCBs can be manufactured with many layers, at almost arbitrary total thickness, and
|
inexpensive, commodity products. PCBs can be manufactured with many layers, at almost arbitrary total thickness, and
|
||||||
|
|
@ -700,11 +707,11 @@ across the contact as shown in Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_connector_elastomeric}, but t
|
||||||
soldering. Hand soldering increases unit cost over mechanized soldering techniques such as wave soldering or reflow
|
soldering. Hand soldering increases unit cost over mechanized soldering techniques such as wave soldering or reflow
|
||||||
soldering.
|
soldering.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
FPCs are suitable for use with standard Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) FPC connectors as shown in
|
FPCs are suitable for use with standard FPC connectors as shown in Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_connector_fpc}. These connectors
|
||||||
Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_connector_fpc} that directly mate to a contact area, called \emph{gold fingers} in industry terms,
|
mate directly to a contact area on the FPC, called \emph{gold fingers} in industry terms. Both FPCs and rigid PCBs can
|
||||||
on the FPC. Both FPCs and rigid PCBs can be used with standard board-to-board stacking connectors such as the one
|
be used with standard board-to-board stacking connectors such as the one visible in the center of
|
||||||
visible in the center of Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_connector_stack}, but their use on FPCs requires a stiffener on the FPC's
|
Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_connector_stack}, but their use on FPCs requires a stiffener on the FPC's back side to ensure the
|
||||||
back side to ensure the solder joints don't break from mechanical stress when connecting or disconnecting.
|
solder joints don't break from mechanical stress when connecting or disconnecting.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In our survey, we frequently found elastomeric connectors used to connect to both flexible and rigid tamper sensing mesh
|
In our survey, we frequently found elastomeric connectors used to connect to both flexible and rigid tamper sensing mesh
|
||||||
assemblies. Elastomeric connectors such as the one shown in the center of Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_connector_elastomeric} are
|
assemblies. Elastomeric connectors such as the one shown in the center of Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_connector_elastomeric} are
|
||||||
|
|
@ -802,7 +809,7 @@ Thermoforming is a cheap industry standard process, but applied to flexible circ
|
||||||
only 2.5-dimensional structures can be created since the starting product is always a planar sheet. Second, the sheet
|
only 2.5-dimensional structures can be created since the starting product is always a planar sheet. Second, the sheet
|
||||||
cannot be cut or contain slots or large holes before forming since it needs to be kept under a constant tension from all
|
cannot be cut or contain slots or large holes before forming since it needs to be kept under a constant tension from all
|
||||||
sides to ensure it evenly stretches into the mold. Finally, the depth achievable in such a process is rather limited,
|
sides to ensure it evenly stretches into the mold. Finally, the depth achievable in such a process is rather limited,
|
||||||
with no sample in our survey exceeding \qty{2}{\milli\meter}\todo{Get proper number}. Higher depths would require
|
with no sample in our survey exceeding \qty{2}{\milli\meter}.\todo{Get proper number} Higher depths would require
|
||||||
extensive deformation of the mesh circuit's plastic substrate, which could lead to tears in the mesh traces since the
|
extensive deformation of the mesh circuit's plastic substrate, which could lead to tears in the mesh traces since the
|
||||||
particle-based conductive inks used for screen-printed electronics are inelastic. Among our samples, we saw two
|
particle-based conductive inks used for screen-printed electronics are inelastic. Among our samples, we saw two
|
||||||
instances of thermoformed meshes. First, all recent Ingenico terminals (\sampleno{H06,H13,H23,H24}) integrated an ink
|
instances of thermoformed meshes. First, all recent Ingenico terminals (\sampleno{H06,H13,H23,H24}) integrated an ink
|
||||||
|
|
@ -840,7 +847,7 @@ access by probes.
|
||||||
\label{fig_ingenico_forming}
|
\label{fig_ingenico_forming}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
specimen~\sampleno{H12}, shown in Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_3d_struct_vacuum_form}, displays one further design defect. The mesh
|
Specimen~\sampleno{H12}, shown in Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_3d_struct_vacuum_form}, displays one further design defect. The mesh
|
||||||
shown does not extend to the edges of the plastic cover it has been molded into. When this cover is placed on top of a
|
shown does not extend to the edges of the plastic cover it has been molded into. When this cover is placed on top of a
|
||||||
PCB to protect components on the PCB from tampering, this leaves a large gap between the bottom edge of the mesh and the
|
PCB to protect components on the PCB from tampering, this leaves a large gap between the bottom edge of the mesh and the
|
||||||
PCB surface, through which probes can be inserted to access either the payload circuit or the mesh monitoring circuitry.
|
PCB surface, through which probes can be inserted to access either the payload circuit or the mesh monitoring circuitry.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -928,15 +935,69 @@ terminal. While a similar result could also be achieved by milling a slot into t
|
||||||
PCB, the economics of PCB manufacturing are such that it may be more cost-effective to bond two standard-thickness PCBs
|
PCB, the economics of PCB manufacturing are such that it may be more cost-effective to bond two standard-thickness PCBs
|
||||||
on top of one another instead.
|
on top of one another instead.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_3d_sandwich_lid} finally shows an advanced construction technique that uses a custom PCB with a
|
Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_3d_sandwich_lid} shows an advanced construction technique that uses a custom PCB with a large indent
|
||||||
large indent milled into its underside soldered on top of a base PCB to create a protected cavity on top of the base
|
milled into its underside soldered on top of a base PCB to create a protected cavity on top of the base PCB. This PCB
|
||||||
PCB. This PCB lid shows a complex internal structure. It is built up in a custom stackup with a total of six layers: A
|
lid shows a complex internal structure. It is built up in a custom stackup with a total of six layers: A ground plane
|
||||||
ground plane filling the top layer, then two orthogonal planar mesh layers covering the inside of the lid above the
|
filling the top layer, then two orthogonal planar mesh layers covering the inside of the lid above the cavity. Below
|
||||||
cavity. Below this standard mesh stackup are two that are used to create a via fence structure similar to that shown in
|
this standard mesh stackup are two that are used to create a via fence structure similar to that shown in
|
||||||
Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_3d_sandwich_via_fence} in an attempt to protect the sides around the central cavity. Below these two
|
Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_3d_sandwich_via_fence} in an attempt to protect the sides around the central cavity. Below these two
|
||||||
via fence layers, at the bottom of the PCB is one more layer containing the pads connecting it to the base PCB.
|
via fence layers, at the bottom of the PCB is one more layer containing the pads connecting it to the base PCB.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Tabular results}
|
\subsubsection{CT Imaging}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{figure}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.45\textwidth}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{mesh_contact_joint.pdf}
|
||||||
|
\caption{CT section cut with part of a mesh layer and the crimped metal mesh contacts visible.}
|
||||||
|
\label{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted_ct_cut}
|
||||||
|
\end{subfigure}
|
||||||
|
\quad
|
||||||
|
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.45\textwidth}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{mesh_geom.pdf}
|
||||||
|
\caption{CT 3D reconstruction of the mesh's trace geometry.}
|
||||||
|
\label{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted_ct_3d}
|
||||||
|
\end{subfigure}
|
||||||
|
\quad
|
||||||
|
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.45\textwidth}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ingenico_hsm_module.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\caption{Photo of the HSM module seated on the payment terminal's main PCB.}
|
||||||
|
\label{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted_seated}
|
||||||
|
\end{subfigure}
|
||||||
|
\caption[Potted module CT images]{Optical photograph and CT pictures of a potted HSM module
|
||||||
|
(specimen~\sampleno{H18}).}
|
||||||
|
\label{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted}
|
||||||
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% FIXME put the CT people in the acknowledgements! Also the microwave people!
|
||||||
|
Hardware manufacturers implementing security meshes often attempt to keep the meshes' layouts hidden as a way of
|
||||||
|
security by obscurity. In practice, this can take the form of opaque potting compounds (cf.
|
||||||
|
Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted_seated}), opaque cover layers (cf. Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_materials_gold_lds}), and
|
||||||
|
burying the mesh beneath other features such as PCB ground planes (cf. Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_3d_sandwich_lid}, e.g.\
|
||||||
|
specimens~\sampleno{H03}, \sampleno{H17} and \sampleno{H32}). To circumvent such attempts, an obvious attack vector is
|
||||||
|
to use radiographical imaging techniques such as X-ray or CT imaging. To evaluate CT imaging as an attack method, we
|
||||||
|
experimentally imaged the potted HSM module of specimen~\sampleno{H18}, an Ingenico payment terminal, using an
|
||||||
|
industrial CT. Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted} shows the module we analyzed and two images exported from the
|
||||||
|
resulting CT scan data. Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted_ct_cut} shows a horizontal cut across part of the module. In
|
||||||
|
this cut, we can clearly identify a mesh layer with multiple traces, four solid metal contacts crimped to the mesh foil,
|
||||||
|
and two unused contact pads and mesh traces in the lower part of the picture. An attacker would be able to use this
|
||||||
|
information to target the metal contacts with a tool like a needle probe. From the CT scan we were able to measure that
|
||||||
|
the mesh of the device has a pitch of \qty{1.0}{\milli\meter}. Thus, even inserting a thin needle probe right through
|
||||||
|
one of the mesh's traces should be possible without breaking the trace.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted_ct_3d} shows a 3D reconstruction of the mesh's conductor layout. While the
|
||||||
|
reconstruction is slightly noisy due to the limited scan time available, it contains ample detail to reconstruct the
|
||||||
|
mesh's layout and conductor count, and even to derive conductor dimensions in order to calculate resistance and other
|
||||||
|
electronic parameters. The mesh's foil is wrapped around the circuit board forming a pillow shape, which is clearly
|
||||||
|
reflected in the reconstructed 3D mesh geometry. This information could be used to guide a CNC milling machine to
|
||||||
|
selectively ablate the device's potting precisely down to the mesh's conductors to enable direct patching attacks on the
|
||||||
|
mesh.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\subsubsection{Results summary}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Below is a table representing which features discussed in the sections above we found in which of our samples. Overall,
|
Below is a table representing which features discussed in the sections above we found in which of our samples. Overall,
|
||||||
we commonly found a combination of a rigid PCB mesh in the specimen's main PCB and and flexible meshes formed into a lid
|
we commonly found a combination of a rigid PCB mesh in the specimen's main PCB and and flexible meshes formed into a lid
|
||||||
|
|
@ -969,7 +1030,7 @@ reverse engineering.
|
||||||
\newcolumntype{M}{>{\centering\arraybackslash}p{4mm}}
|
\newcolumntype{M}{>{\centering\arraybackslash}p{4mm}}
|
||||||
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{0pt}
|
\setlength{\tabcolsep}{0pt}
|
||||||
\begin{tabular}{ll|MMMMM|MMMM|MMMMM|MMMMM|MMMMM|MMM|MM}
|
\begin{tabular}{ll|MMMMM|MMMM|MMMMM|MMMMM|MMMMM|MMM|MM}
|
||||||
&&\multicolumn{29}{c}{\textbf{Mesh}}\\
|
&&\multicolumn{29}{c}{\textbf{Specimen}}\\
|
||||||
\textbf{Feature} & \textbf{Figures} &
|
\textbf{Feature} & \textbf{Figures} &
|
||||||
1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 8 & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 & 13 & 14 & 15 & 16 & 17 & 18 & 19 & 20 & 21 & 22 & 23 & 24 & 25 & 27 & 28 & 30 & 31 & 32
|
1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 8 & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 & 13 & 14 & 15 & 16 & 17 & 18 & 19 & 20 & 21 & 22 & 23 & 24 & 25 & 27 & 28 & 30 & 31 & 32
|
||||||
\\\hline
|
\\\hline
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1135,64 +1196,12 @@ Integrated contact pads & \ref{hsm_fig_connector_fpc}
|
||||||
& & & \\ % 30 - 32
|
& & & \\ % 30 - 32
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{tabular}
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
\caption{Feature matrix of all specimens analyzed.}
|
\caption[Feature matrix of all specimens analyzed.]{Feature matrix of all specimens analyzed. Dots indicate presence
|
||||||
|
of a feature. The figures column lists which figures above contain examples of a particular feature.}
|
||||||
\label{tab_hsm_survey_sample_results}
|
\label{tab_hsm_survey_sample_results}
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
\end{landscape}
|
\end{landscape}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsubsection{CT Imaging}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure}
|
|
||||||
\centering
|
|
||||||
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.45\textwidth}
|
|
||||||
\centering
|
|
||||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{mesh_contact_joint.pdf}
|
|
||||||
\caption{CT section cut with part of a mesh layer and the crimped metal mesh contacts visible.}
|
|
||||||
\label{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted_ct_cut}
|
|
||||||
\end{subfigure}
|
|
||||||
\quad
|
|
||||||
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.45\textwidth}
|
|
||||||
\centering
|
|
||||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{mesh_geom.pdf}
|
|
||||||
\caption{CT 3D reconstruction of the mesh's trace geometry.}
|
|
||||||
\label{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted_ct_3d}
|
|
||||||
\end{subfigure}
|
|
||||||
\quad
|
|
||||||
\begin{subfigure}[t]{0.45\textwidth}
|
|
||||||
\centering
|
|
||||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ingenico_hsm_module.jpg}
|
|
||||||
\caption{Photo of the HSM module seated on the payment terminal's main PCB.}
|
|
||||||
\label{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted_seated}
|
|
||||||
\end{subfigure}
|
|
||||||
\caption[Potted module CT images]{Optical photograph and CT pictures of a potted HSM module
|
|
||||||
(specimen~\sampleno{H18}).}
|
|
||||||
\label{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted}
|
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% FIXME put the CT people in the acknowledgements! Also the microwave people!
|
|
||||||
Hardware manufacturers implementing security meshes often attempt to keep the meshes' layouts hidden as a way of
|
|
||||||
security by obscurity. In practice, this can take the form of opaque potting compounds (cf.
|
|
||||||
Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted_seated}), opaque cover layers (cf. Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_materials_gold_lds}), and
|
|
||||||
burying the mesh beneath other features such as PCB ground planes (cf. Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_3d_sandwich_lid}, e.g.\
|
|
||||||
specimens~\sampleno{H03}, \sampleno{H17} and \sampleno{H32}). To circumvent such attempts, an obvious attack vector is
|
|
||||||
to use radiographical imaging techniques such as X-ray or CT imaging. To evaluate CT imaging as an attack method, we
|
|
||||||
experimentally imaged the potted HSM module of specimen~\sampleno{H18}, an Ingenico payment terminal, using an
|
|
||||||
industrial CT. Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted} shows the module we analyzed and two images exported from the
|
|
||||||
resulting CT scan data. Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted_ct_cut} shows a horizontal cut across part of the module. In
|
|
||||||
this cut, we can clearly identify a mesh layer with multiple traces, four solid metal contacts crimped to the mesh foil,
|
|
||||||
and two unused contact pads and mesh traces in the lower part of the picture. An attacker would be able to use this
|
|
||||||
information to target the metal contacts with a tool like a needle probe. From the CT scan we were able to measure that
|
|
||||||
the mesh of the device has a pitch of \qty{1.0}{\milli\meter}. Thus, even inserting a thin needle probe right through
|
|
||||||
one of the mesh's traces should be possible without breaking the trace.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Figure~\ref{hsm_fig_ingenico_potted_ct_3d} shows a 3D reconstruction of the mesh's conductor layout. While the
|
|
||||||
reconstruction is slightly noisy due to the limited scan time available, it contains ample detail to reconstruct the
|
|
||||||
mesh's layout and conductor count, and even to derive conductor dimensions in order to calculate resistance and other
|
|
||||||
electronic parameters. The mesh's foil is wrapped around the circuit board forming a pillow shape, which is clearly
|
|
||||||
reflected in the reconstructed 3D mesh geometry. This information could be used to guide a CNC milling machine to
|
|
||||||
selectively ablate the device's potting precisely down to the mesh's conductors to enable direct patching attacks on the
|
|
||||||
mesh.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Discussion}
|
\section{Discussion}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In our survey, we have seen the technological state of the art to which tamper-sensing meshes have evolved since the
|
In our survey, we have seen the technological state of the art to which tamper-sensing meshes have evolved since the
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
493
chapter-hsms/pres-harris.tex
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,493 @@
|
||||||
|
\documentclass[aspectratio=169]{beamer}
|
||||||
|
\usetheme{default}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{textcomp}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{subcaption}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{siunitx}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{booktabs}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{array}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{ragged2e}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{colortbl}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{pdflscape}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage[percent]{overpic}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage[backend=biber,style=numeric,sorting=none]{biblatex}
|
||||||
|
\addbibresource{../main.bib}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\graphicspath{{figures}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% Define custom commands if not already defined
|
||||||
|
\newcommand{\surveypic}[2]{
|
||||||
|
\begingroup
|
||||||
|
\setlength{\fboxsep}{0.2mm}
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[percent,height=10mm]{#2}
|
||||||
|
\put(100,85){\makebox[0pt][r]{\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize H#1}}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
\endgroup
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
\newcommand{\sampleno}[1]{#1}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\title{Tamper-Sensing Meshes in the Wild}
|
||||||
|
\author{\textbf{Jan Sebastian Götte} \& Björn Scheuermann\\TU Darmstadt\\contact: \texttt{research@jaseg.de}}
|
||||||
|
\date{2026-03-24}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{document}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}
|
||||||
|
\titlepage
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{What is a Tamper Sensing Mesh?}
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Embedded looped conductor covering a surface
|
||||||
|
\item Detects physical intrusion
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Drills, saws, lasers etc.
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Triggers some tamper response
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Deleting keys
|
||||||
|
\item Raising alarms
|
||||||
|
\item Explosions?
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Widely used in HSMs, payment terminals, ATMs, nuclear weapons
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{The History of Tamper-Sensing Meshes}
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item \textbf{1870}: First patents using literal wire meshes to protect bank vaults~\cite{ImprovementProtectingSafes1870,ImprovementElectromagneticEnvelopes1870}
|
||||||
|
\item \textbf{1902}: Multi-layer, orthogonal meshes documented~\cite{suttonElectricallyprotectedStructure1902}
|
||||||
|
\item \textbf{1971}: Printed circuit technology adopted~\cite{hamPrintedcircuitTypeSecurity1971}
|
||||||
|
\item \textbf{1990s}: Widespread commercial adoption with cryptographic applications
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Other, hard to date examples: NSA use for protecting ciphering machines~\cite{boakHistoryUSCommunications1973,boakHistoryUSCommunications1981}, US use in nuclear weapons~\cite{carterManagingNuclearOperations1987}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Commercial Applications Today}
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Datacenter HSMs (Key management, payment processing)
|
||||||
|
\item Card Payment Terminals (PIN encryption)
|
||||||
|
\item ATM Encrypting Pin Pads (PIN encryption)
|
||||||
|
\item Key Safes for Emergency services access (Germany only?)
|
||||||
|
\item Mail Franking Machines (credit counter)
|
||||||
|
\item Slot Machines (likely for DRM)
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Our Survey}
|
||||||
|
\textbf{Sample Size}: 30 devices
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\textbf{Device Types}:
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item 23 Card payment terminals (Verifone, Ingenico, SumUp, etc.)
|
||||||
|
\item 3 ATM Encrypting Pin Pads (NCR, Sagem)
|
||||||
|
\item 2 HSM modules (SafeNet, Utimaco)
|
||||||
|
\item 1 Franking machine
|
||||||
|
\item 1 German slot machine CPU
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Mesh Materials and Structure Sizes Observed}
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item \textbf{Rigid PCB (FR-4):} Photolithographic etching, \SIrange{100}{200}{\micro\meter}
|
||||||
|
\item \textbf{Polyimide/Copper FPC:} Photolithographic etching, \SIrange{100}{200}{\micro\meter}
|
||||||
|
\item \textbf{Silver ink FPC:} Screen printing, \SIrange{500}{3000}{\micro\meter}
|
||||||
|
\item \textbf{Carbon ink FPC:} Screen printing, \SIrange{500}{3000}{\micro\meter}
|
||||||
|
\item \textbf{Gold laser direct structuring:} Laser Direct Structuring, \SIrange{50}{200}{\micro\meter}
|
||||||
|
\item \textbf{IBM/Gore mesh:} Printed, \SIrange{200}{1500}{\micro\meter}
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Survey Specimens - External Photos}
|
||||||
|
\begin{figure}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\footnotesize
|
||||||
|
\begin{tabular}[c]{cccccc}
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{02}{survey_diag_S02.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{03}{survey_diag_S03.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{04}{survey_diag_S04.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{05}{survey_diag_S05.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{06}{survey_diag_S06.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{08}{survey_diag_S08.jpg}\\
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{09}{survey_diag_S09.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{10}{survey_diag_S10.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{11}{survey_diag_S11.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{12}{survey_diag_S12.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{13}{survey_diag_S13.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{14}{survey_diag_S14.jpg}\\
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{15}{survey_diag_S15.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{16}{survey_diag_S16.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{17}{survey_diag_S17.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{18}{survey_diag_S18.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{19}{survey_diag_S19.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{20}{survey_diag_S20.jpg}\\
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{21}{survey_diag_S21.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{22}{survey_diag_S22.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{23}{survey_diag_S23.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{24}{survey_diag_S24.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{25}{survey_diag_S25.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{27}{survey_diag_S27.jpg}\\
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{28}{survey_diag_S28.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{29}{survey_diag_S29.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{30}{survey_diag_S30.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{31}{survey_diag_S31.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{32}{survey_diag_S32.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Survey Specimens - Internal Photos}
|
||||||
|
\begin{figure}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\footnotesize
|
||||||
|
\begin{tabular}[c]{cccccc}
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{01}{survey_internal_09_S01.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{02}{survey_internal_20_S02.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{03}{survey_internal_11_S03.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{04}{survey_internal_03_S04.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{05}{survey_internal_10_S05.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{06}{survey_internal_08_S06.jpg}\\
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{08}{survey_internal_24_S08.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{09}{survey_internal_13_S09.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{10}{survey_internal_23_S10.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{11}{survey_internal_17_S11.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{12}{survey_internal_19_S12.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{13}{survey_internal_02_S13.jpg}\\
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{14}{survey_internal_00_S14.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{15}{survey_internal_04_S15.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{16}{survey_internal_05_S16.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{17}{survey_internal_22_S17.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{18}{survey_internal_21_S18.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{19}{survey_internal_26_S19.jpg}\\
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{20}{survey_internal_12_S20.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{21}{survey_internal_15_S21.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{22}{survey_internal_16_S22.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{23}{survey_internal_07_S23.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{24}{survey_internal_06_S24.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{25}{survey_internal_25_S25.jpg}\\
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{27}{survey_internal_18_S27.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{28}{survey_internal_14_S28.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{30}{survey_internal_29_S30.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{31}{survey_internal_27_S31.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\surveypic{32}{survey_internal_28_S32.jpg}&
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Mesh Trace Layouts}
|
||||||
|
\begin{columns}[T]
|
||||||
|
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.45\textwidth]{hsm_mesh_offset.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries A}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
\hspace{1mm}
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.45\textwidth]{hsm_mesh_orthogonal.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries B}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\vspace{5mm}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.45\textwidth]{hsm_utimaco_mesh_gore.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries C}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
\hspace{1mm}
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.45\textwidth]{hsm_mesh_stack_epp.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries D}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
\end{column}
|
||||||
|
\begin{column}{0.45\textwidth}
|
||||||
|
\raggedright
|
||||||
|
\textbf{A:} Offset layers (H12)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\textbf{B:} Orthogonal patterns (H14)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\textbf{C:} Orthogonal + area pattern (H30)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\textbf{D:} Spaced layers (H28)
|
||||||
|
\end{column}
|
||||||
|
\end{columns}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Mesh Materials and Manufacturing}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\begin{tabular}{lll}
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.22\textwidth]{trace_material_copper_pcb.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries A}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
&
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.22\textwidth]{trace_material_copper_flex.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries B}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
&
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.22\textwidth]{trace_material_silver.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries C}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
\\[3mm]
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.22\textwidth]{trace_material_contact_gold_lds.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries D}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
&
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.22\textwidth]{trace_material_carbon.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries E}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
&
|
||||||
|
\begin{tabular}[b]{@{}l@{}}
|
||||||
|
\textbf{A:} Rigid PCB (H10) \\
|
||||||
|
\textbf{B:} Flexible PCB (H15) \\
|
||||||
|
\textbf{C:} Silver ink (H14) \\
|
||||||
|
\textbf{D:} Laser Direct Structuring (H32) \\
|
||||||
|
\textbf{E:} Carbon ink (H30)
|
||||||
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Mesh Connection Methods}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\begin{tabular}{ccc}
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.20\textwidth]{connector_castellated_edge.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries A}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
&
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.20\textwidth]{connector_elastomeric.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries B}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
&
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.20\textwidth]{connector_rf_gasket.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries C}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
\\[2mm]
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.20\textwidth]{connector_zif_fpc_2.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries D}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
&
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.20\textwidth]{connector_stacking.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries E}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
&
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.20\textwidth]{connector_metal_dome.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries F}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\vspace{3mm}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\small
|
||||||
|
\textbf{A:} Direct soldering (H05) \quad
|
||||||
|
\textbf{B:} Elastomeric connector (H31) \quad
|
||||||
|
\textbf{C:} EMI gasket (H14) \\
|
||||||
|
\textbf{D:} FPC connector (H20) \quad
|
||||||
|
\textbf{E:} Stacking connector (H17) \quad
|
||||||
|
\textbf{F:} Tactile dome (H06)
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{3D Mesh Construction Styles}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\begin{tabular}{lll}
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.22\textwidth]{hsm_3d_style_fold_overlap.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries A}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
&
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.22\textwidth]{hsm_3d_style_fold_no_overlap.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries B}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
&
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.22\textwidth]{3d_construction_lds_top.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries C}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
\\[3mm]
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.22\textwidth]{hsm_3d_style_vacform.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries D}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
&
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.22\textwidth]{3d_construction_cards_standalone.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries E}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
&
|
||||||
|
\begin{tabular}[b]{@{}l@{}}
|
||||||
|
\textbf{A:} Folded with overlap (H03) \\
|
||||||
|
\textbf{B:} Folded without overlap (H14) \\
|
||||||
|
\textbf{C:} Laser Direct Structuring (H32) \\
|
||||||
|
\textbf{D:} Thermoformed (H12) \\
|
||||||
|
\textbf{E:} House-of-Cards (H08)
|
||||||
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Thermoforming Example}
|
||||||
|
\begin{columns}[T]
|
||||||
|
\begin{column}{0.48\textwidth}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\includegraphics[width=.6\textwidth]{survey_formed_mesh_before.jpg}\\
|
||||||
|
\small Before removing lacquer
|
||||||
|
\end{column}
|
||||||
|
\begin{column}{0.48\textwidth}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\includegraphics[width=.6\textwidth]{survey_formed_mesh_after.jpg}\\
|
||||||
|
\small After removing lacquer
|
||||||
|
\end{column}
|
||||||
|
\end{columns}
|
||||||
|
\vspace{3mm}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\small Formed cavities in printed foil mesh specimen H24
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Sandwich-Style Construction}
|
||||||
|
\begin{columns}[T]
|
||||||
|
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.45\textwidth]{3d_construction_offset_mesh_delayered_contrast_improved.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries A}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
\hspace{1mm}
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.45\textwidth]{3d_construction_via_stitch_mesh_delayer_2.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries B}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\vspace{3mm}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.45\textwidth]{3d_construction_planar_stack.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries C}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
\hspace{1mm}
|
||||||
|
\begin{overpic}[width=.45\textwidth]{3d_construction_cavity_2.jpg}
|
||||||
|
\put(5,92){\colorbox{white}{\footnotesize\bfseries D}}
|
||||||
|
\end{overpic}
|
||||||
|
\end{column}
|
||||||
|
\begin{column}{0.45\textwidth}
|
||||||
|
\raggedright
|
||||||
|
\textbf{A:} Obstacle mesh coupons (H17)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\textbf{B:} Via-fence meshes (H24)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\textbf{C:} Planar sandwich stack (H24)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\textbf{D:} PCB lid with cavity (H14)
|
||||||
|
\end{column}
|
||||||
|
\end{columns}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Security Issues Observed}
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Incomplete mesh coverage
|
||||||
|
\item Meshes not overlapping at edges leaving gaps for probe insertion
|
||||||
|
\item Gaps at mesh-PCB interfaces
|
||||||
|
\item Thermoformed cavities with enlarged structure size at corners
|
||||||
|
\item In one case, an opaque lacquer was easily removed with acetone (without damaging the mesh!)
|
||||||
|
\item Trace patterns visible through cover layers due to surface unevenness
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Design Recommendations (1/2)}
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Commodity PCB manufacturing process design rules in the \SIrange{100}{200}{\micro\meter} range are better than the state of the art in mesh structure size
|
||||||
|
\item Avoid ink printing processes or thermoforming because of their large structure size
|
||||||
|
\item Carefully think about your literal corner cases (and edges)!
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Overlap meshes where possible.
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Use potting and cover layers, but verify that they work
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Check that you \emph{actually} can't see what's below
|
||||||
|
\item Test their chemical resistance (and that of your mesh)
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Design Recommendations (2/2)}
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Mixing tough potting or enclosure materials and fragile mesh materials makes life harder for an attacker
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Consider using steel instead of plastic (also helps against X-ray inspection!)
|
||||||
|
\item Use thin substrates and thin conductive layers for the mesh
|
||||||
|
\item Balance adhesion so removing potting / cover layers tears away traces below
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item Overlap mesh layers at a 50\% structure size offset
|
||||||
|
\item Space (some) mesh layers apart in Z direction to constrain attack tools
|
||||||
|
\item Use a pressure-sensitive connection method like tactile domes or elastomeric conncetors
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\Huge Thank you!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\vspace{1cm}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\Large Questions?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\texttt{research@jaseg.de}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
Long-form version of this presentation in my thesis (pre-release, to be published this summer):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\url{https://jaseg.de/thesis-final-web.pdf}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\includegraphics{thesis_qr.png}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Specimen List (1/2)}
|
||||||
|
\footnotesize
|
||||||
|
\begin{tabular}{c>{\RaggedRight\arraybackslash}p{25mm}>{\RaggedRight\arraybackslash}p{35mm}ll}
|
||||||
|
\toprule
|
||||||
|
\textbf{ID} & \textbf{Device} & \textbf{Manufacturer} & \textbf{Type} & \textbf{Year} \\
|
||||||
|
\midrule
|
||||||
|
H01 & PED & Verifone & VX 570 & ca. 2010 \\
|
||||||
|
H02 & Slot machine & Merkur / ADP & Sam 12 EC2 & ca. 2012 \\
|
||||||
|
H03 & EPP & Sagem & USA1315-4240 & 2014 \\
|
||||||
|
H04 & EPP & Sagem & USA1316-5120 & 2007 \\
|
||||||
|
H05 & PED & Xac & xAPT-103 & 2014 \\
|
||||||
|
H06 & PED & Ingenico & iCT250-11T1860A & 2016-17 \\
|
||||||
|
H08 & PED & Sagem & NOR4100-4220 & 2012 \\
|
||||||
|
H09 & PED & Hypercom & M4230 & 2010 \\
|
||||||
|
H10 & PED & Worldline & YOMANI XR & 2016 \\
|
||||||
|
H11 & PED & Banksys & C-ZAM Smash & 2004 \\
|
||||||
|
H12 & PED & Hypercom & Optimum P2100 & 2010 \\
|
||||||
|
H13 & PED & Ingenico & iCT 220-11T2938A & 2016 \\
|
||||||
|
H14 & PED & Verifone & H5000 & 2016 \\
|
||||||
|
H15 & PED & Verifone & MX 925 & 2018 \\
|
||||||
|
H16 & PED & Verifone & V200c CTLS & 2021 \\
|
||||||
|
H17 & PED & Verifone & VX 680 & 2014 \\
|
||||||
|
\bottomrule
|
||||||
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}{Specimen List (2/2)}
|
||||||
|
\footnotesize
|
||||||
|
\begin{tabular}{c>{\RaggedRight\arraybackslash}p{25mm}>{\RaggedRight\arraybackslash}p{35mm}ll}
|
||||||
|
\toprule
|
||||||
|
\textbf{ID} & \textbf{Device} & \textbf{Manufacturer} & \textbf{Type} & \textbf{Year} \\
|
||||||
|
\midrule
|
||||||
|
H18 & PED & Ingenico & i7910 & 2010 \\
|
||||||
|
H19 & PED & Banksys & XENTA & 2004-2011 \\
|
||||||
|
H20 & PED & Verifone & VX 520 3G & 2017 \\
|
||||||
|
H21 & PED & Verifone & V400m Plus 4G & 2018 \\
|
||||||
|
H22 & PED & Ingenico & Move 3500 & 2020 \\
|
||||||
|
H23 & PED & Ingenico & iPP 350-11T1718A & 2015 \\
|
||||||
|
H24 & PED & Ingenico & iWL255-01T2117A & 2016 \\
|
||||||
|
H25 & Franking Mach. & Neopost & IJ-25 & ca. 2001 \\
|
||||||
|
H27 & PED & Sumup & AIR1E205 & 2021 \\
|
||||||
|
H28 & EPP & NCR & 5814 UEPP & 2019 \\
|
||||||
|
H29 & HSM & SafeNet & VBD-05 & 2018 \\
|
||||||
|
H30 & HSM & Irdeto & Mayflower & 2011 \\
|
||||||
|
H31 & PED & SumUp & SumUp 3G & 2019 \\
|
||||||
|
H32 & PED & SumUp & SumUp Air & 2022 \\
|
||||||
|
\bottomrule
|
||||||
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
|
\vspace{3mm}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\tiny PED: Pin Entry Device; EPP: Encrypting Pin Pad; HSM: Hardware Security Module
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{frame}[allowframebreaks]{References}
|
||||||
|
\printbibliography[heading=none]
|
||||||
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\end{document}
|
||||||
|
|
@ -16,8 +16,8 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Introduction}
|
\section{Introduction}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\sourceattrib{This part is adapted from a paper written by me and presented by me at CHES
|
\sourceattrib{This part is adapted from a paper written by Jan Sebastian Götte and Prof.\ Dr.\ Björn Scheuermann and
|
||||||
2022~\cite{gotteCantTouchThis2022}.}
|
presented by Jan Sebastian Götte at CHES 2022~\cite{gotteCantTouchThis2022}.}
|
||||||
While information security technology has matured a great deal in the last half-century, physical security did not keep
|
While information security technology has matured a great deal in the last half-century, physical security did not keep
|
||||||
up with the pace of the remainder of this industry. Given the right skills, physical access to a computer still often
|
up with the pace of the remainder of this industry. Given the right skills, physical access to a computer still often
|
||||||
allows full compromise. The physical security of modern server hardware hinges on what lock you put on the room it is
|
allows full compromise. The physical security of modern server hardware hinges on what lock you put on the room it is
|
||||||
|
|
@ -74,8 +74,7 @@ This chapter contains the following contributions:
|
||||||
\label{prototype_picture}
|
\label{prototype_picture}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In Section~\ref{sec_related_work}, we will give an overview of the state of the art in HSM physical security. On this
|
In Section~\ref{sec_ihsm_construction} we will elaborate the principles of our Inertial HSM approach. We will
|
||||||
basis, in Section~\ref{sec_ihsm_construction} we will elaborate the principles of our Inertial HSM approach. We will
|
|
||||||
analyze its weaknesses in Section~\ref{sec_attacks}. Based on these results we have built a proof-of-concept hardware
|
analyze its weaknesses in Section~\ref{sec_attacks}. Based on these results we have built a proof-of-concept hardware
|
||||||
prototype. In Section~\ref{sec_proto} we will elaborate on the design of this prototype. In Section~\ref{sec_accel_meas}
|
prototype. In Section~\ref{sec_proto} we will elaborate on the design of this prototype. In Section~\ref{sec_accel_meas}
|
||||||
we present our characterization of an automotive MEMS accelerometer IC as a rotation sensor in this proof-of-concept
|
we present our characterization of an automotive MEMS accelerometer IC as a rotation sensor in this proof-of-concept
|
||||||
|
|
@ -86,12 +85,9 @@ prototype. We conclude this chapter with a general evaluation of our design in S
|
||||||
% summaries of research papers on HSMs. I have not found any actual prior art on anything involving mechanical motion
|
% summaries of research papers on HSMs. I have not found any actual prior art on anything involving mechanical motion
|
||||||
% beyond ultrasound.
|
% beyond ultrasound.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this section, we will briefly explore the history of HSMs and the state of academic research on active tamper
|
As we elaborated in Chapter~\ref{chapter-survey}, HSMs are an old technology that traces back decades in its electronic
|
||||||
detection.
|
realization. Today's common approach of monitoring meandering electrical traces on a fragile foil that is wrapped around
|
||||||
|
the HSM essentially transforms the security problem into the challenge to
|
||||||
HSMs are an old technology that traces back decades in its electronic realization, initially being conceived by the US
|
|
||||||
NSA during the second world war~\cite{boak1973}. Today's common approach of monitoring meandering electrical traces on a
|
|
||||||
fragile foil that is wrapped around the HSM essentially transforms the security problem into the challenge to
|
|
||||||
manufacture very fine electrical traces on a flexible foil~\cite{isaacs2013, immler2019,
|
manufacture very fine electrical traces on a flexible foil~\cite{isaacs2013, immler2019,
|
||||||
andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020}. There has been some research on monitoring the HSM's interior using e.g.\
|
andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020}. There has been some research on monitoring the HSM's interior using e.g.\
|
||||||
electromagnetic radiation~\cite{tobisch2020, kreft2012} or ultrasound~\cite{vrijaldenhoven2004} but none of this
|
electromagnetic radiation~\cite{tobisch2020, kreft2012} or ultrasound~\cite{vrijaldenhoven2004} but none of this
|
||||||
|
|
@ -102,22 +98,6 @@ difference is that an HSM continuously monitors itself whereas a physical seal o
|
||||||
requires someone to examine it. This examination can be done by eye in the field, but it can also be carried out in a
|
requires someone to examine it. This examination can be done by eye in the field, but it can also be carried out in a
|
||||||
laboratory using complex equipment. An HSM in principle has to have this examination equipment built-in.
|
laboratory using complex equipment. An HSM in principle has to have this examination equipment built-in.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Physical seals are used in a wide variety of applications. The most interesting ones from a research point of view that
|
|
||||||
are recorded in public literature are those used for the monitoring of nuclear material under the International Atomic
|
|
||||||
Energy Authority (IAEA). Most of these seals use the same approach that is used in Physically Unclonable Functions
|
|
||||||
(PUFs), though their development predates that of PUFs by several decades. The seal is created in a way that
|
|
||||||
intentionally causes large, random device-to-device variations. These variations are precisely recorded at deployment.
|
|
||||||
At the end of the seal's lifetime, the seal is returned to a lab and closely examined to check for any deviations from
|
|
||||||
the seal's prior recorded state. The type of variation used in these seals includes random scratches in metal parts and
|
|
||||||
random blobs of solder (IAEA metal cap seal), randomly cut optical fibers (COBRA seal), the uncontrollably random
|
|
||||||
distribution of glitter particles in a polymer matrix (COBRA seal prototypes) as well as the precise three-dimensional
|
|
||||||
surface structure of metal parts at microscopic scales (LMCV)~\cite{iaea2011}.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The IAEA's equipment portfolio does include electronic seals such as the EOSS. These devices are intended for remote
|
|
||||||
reading, similar to an HSM. They are constructed from two components: A cable that is surveilled for tampering, and a
|
|
||||||
monitoring device. The monitoring device itself is in effect an HSM and uses a security mesh foil like it is used in
|
|
||||||
commercial HSMs.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The self-destruct built into an HSM serves as a strong tamper deterrent. For illustration, compare an HSM to a computer
|
The self-destruct built into an HSM serves as a strong tamper deterrent. For illustration, compare an HSM to a computer
|
||||||
inside a locked safe when opposing a well-funded attacker with plenty of time. In~\cite{boak1973}, Boak asserts that
|
inside a locked safe when opposing a well-funded attacker with plenty of time. In~\cite{boak1973}, Boak asserts that
|
||||||
absent an HSM's capability to self-destruct, the best safes can only withstand brute force attacks by an expert for
|
absent an HSM's capability to self-destruct, the best safes can only withstand brute force attacks by an expert for
|
||||||
|
|
@ -261,9 +241,9 @@ security barrier. In industry, mesh membranes are commonly used for tamper dete
|
||||||
systems for a variety of use cases ranging from low-security payment processing to high-security certificate management.
|
systems for a variety of use cases ranging from low-security payment processing to high-security certificate management.
|
||||||
From this, we can conclude that a properly implemented mesh \emph{can} provide a practical level of security. In
|
From this, we can conclude that a properly implemented mesh \emph{can} provide a practical level of security. In
|
||||||
contrast to this industry focus, academic research has largely focused on ways to fabricate enclosures that embed
|
contrast to this industry focus, academic research has largely focused on ways to fabricate enclosures that embed
|
||||||
characteristics of a Physically Unclonable Function as a means of tamper detection~\cite{tobisch2020,immler2019}. By
|
characteristics of a PUF as a means of tamper detection~\cite{tobisch2020,immler2019}. By using stochastic properties of
|
||||||
using stochastic properties of the enclosure material to form a PUF, such academic designs leverage signal processing
|
the enclosure material to form a PUF, such academic designs leverage signal processing techniques to improve the
|
||||||
techniques to improve the system's security level by a significant margin.
|
system's security level by a significant margin.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In our research, we focus on security meshes as our IHSM's tamper sensors. The cost of advanced manufacturing
|
In our research, we focus on security meshes as our IHSM's tamper sensors. The cost of advanced manufacturing
|
||||||
techniques and special materials used in fine commercial meshes poses an obstacle to small-scale manufacturing and
|
techniques and special materials used in fine commercial meshes poses an obstacle to small-scale manufacturing and
|
||||||
|
|
@ -343,12 +323,16 @@ shaft penetrates the mesh to simplify mechanical construction.
|
||||||
The spinning mesh must be designed to cover the entire surface of the payload, but it suffices if it sweeps over every
|
The spinning mesh must be designed to cover the entire surface of the payload, but it suffices if it sweeps over every
|
||||||
part of the payload once per rotation. This means we can design longitudinal gaps into the mesh that allow outside air
|
part of the payload once per rotation. This means we can design longitudinal gaps into the mesh that allow outside air
|
||||||
to flow through to the payload. In traditional boundary-sensing HSMs, cooling of the payload processor is a serious
|
to flow through to the payload. In traditional boundary-sensing HSMs, cooling of the payload processor is a serious
|
||||||
issue since any air duct or heat pipe would have to penetrate the HSM's security boundary. This problem can only be
|
issue since any air duct or heat pipe would have to penetrate the HSM's security boundary~\cite{
|
||||||
solved with complex and costly siphon-style constructions, so in commercial systems, heat conduction is used
|
petriePartIITechnical,
|
||||||
exclusively~\cite{isaacs2013}. This limits the maximum power dissipation of the payload and thus its processing power.
|
curetHardwareSecurityModule2025,
|
||||||
Using longitudinal gaps in the mesh, our setup allows direct air cooling of regular heatsinks. This unlocks much more
|
zhangTamperrespondentAssembliesPorous2023,
|
||||||
powerful processing capabilities that greatly increase the maximum possible power dissipation of the payload. In an
|
dragoneVentedTamperrespondentAssemblies2020}.
|
||||||
evolution of our design, the spinning mesh could even be designed to \emph{be} a cooling fan.
|
This problem can only be solved with complex and costly siphon-style constructions, so in commercial systems, heat
|
||||||
|
conduction is used exclusively~\cite{isaacs2013}. This limits the maximum power dissipation of the payload and thus its
|
||||||
|
processing power. Using longitudinal gaps in the mesh, our setup allows direct air cooling of regular heatsinks. This
|
||||||
|
unlocks much more powerful processing capabilities that greatly increase the maximum possible power dissipation of the
|
||||||
|
payload. In an evolution of our design, the spinning mesh could even be designed to \emph{be} a cooling fan.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Conventional HSMs are limited by the construction of their security meshes which rely on plastics as their main
|
Conventional HSMs are limited by the construction of their security meshes which rely on plastics as their main
|
||||||
structural material. The security mesh has to fit the highest components inside the HSM. Since creating a security mesh
|
structural material. The security mesh has to fit the highest components inside the HSM. Since creating a security mesh
|
||||||
|
|
@ -581,7 +565,8 @@ acceleration is $a=\omega^2 r$. In our example, this results in a minimum angula
|
||||||
\frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{a}{r}} = \frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{\SI{1000}{\meter\per\second^2}}{\SI{100}{\milli\meter}}}
|
\frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{a}{r}} = \frac{1}{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{\SI{1000}{\meter\per\second^2}}{\SI{100}{\milli\meter}}}
|
||||||
\approx \SI{16}{\hertz} \approx \SI{1000}{rpm}$. From this, we can conclude that even at moderate speeds of
|
\approx \SI{16}{\hertz} \approx \SI{1000}{rpm}$. From this, we can conclude that even at moderate speeds of
|
||||||
$\SI{1000}{rpm}$ and above, a manual attack is no longer possible and any attack would have to be carried out using some
|
$\SI{1000}{rpm}$ and above, a manual attack is no longer possible and any attack would have to be carried out using some
|
||||||
kind of mechanical tool.
|
kind of mechanical tool. Literature supports this conclusion, with loss of orientation reported as early as at
|
||||||
|
\SI{70}{rpm} in an observer located on the axis of rotation~\cite{fowlerInvestigationFlowProcesses1966}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure}
|
\begin{figure}
|
||||||
\center
|
\center
|
||||||
|
|
@ -976,7 +961,7 @@ the fly, without stopping the rotor.
|
||||||
\section{Conclusion}
|
\section{Conclusion}
|
||||||
\label{sec_conclusion}
|
\label{sec_conclusion}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this chapter, we introduced Inertial Hardware Security Modules (IHSMs), a novel concept for the construction of
|
In this chapter, we introduce Inertial Hardware Security Modules (IHSMs), a novel concept for the construction of
|
||||||
advanced hardware security modules from simple components. We analyzed the concept for its security properties and
|
advanced hardware security modules from simple components. We analyzed the concept for its security properties and
|
||||||
highlighted its ability to significantly strengthen otherwise weak tamper detection barriers. We validated our design
|
highlighted its ability to significantly strengthen otherwise weak tamper detection barriers. We validated our design
|
||||||
by creating a proof-of-concept hardware prototype. In this prototype, we have demonstrated practical solutions to the
|
by creating a proof-of-concept hardware prototype. In this prototype, we have demonstrated practical solutions to the
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1001,5 +986,6 @@ Chapter~\ref{chapter_sampling_mesh_mon}, we will introduce a low-cost tamper sen
|
||||||
Time Domain Reflectometry. Using this approach, we can further strengthen the security of meshes created using simple
|
Time Domain Reflectometry. Using this approach, we can further strengthen the security of meshes created using simple
|
||||||
manufacturing processes in an IHSM. In Chapter~\ref{chapter-nice-coils}, we approach the question of a
|
manufacturing processes in an IHSM. In Chapter~\ref{chapter-nice-coils}, we approach the question of a
|
||||||
rotation-invariant wireless inductive power supply for an IHSM and provide a planar inductor layout that minimizes
|
rotation-invariant wireless inductive power supply for an IHSM and provide a planar inductor layout that minimizes
|
||||||
voltage ripple with IHSM rotation.
|
voltage ripple with IHSM rotation. In Chapters~\ref{chapter-qkd} and \ref{chapter-smpc}, we will analyze two use cases
|
||||||
|
benefitting from IHSMs and tailor the IHSM concept to their requirements.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -8,49 +8,12 @@
|
||||||
\chaptertitle{Introduction}
|
\chaptertitle{Introduction}
|
||||||
\label{chapter-intro}
|
\label{chapter-intro}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% New draft:
|
|
||||||
%
|
|
||||||
% Passionate statement about democracy and academic freedom
|
|
||||||
%
|
|
||||||
% We live in times of rising fascist and authoritarian sentiment worldwide. While computer science and cryptography are
|
|
||||||
% often portrayed as politically neutral technologies, their practice is a political act and can have grave real-world
|
|
||||||
% consequences.
|
|
||||||
% maybe: Within mathematics and computer science, the field of cryptography is unique in that it smainstream views
|
|
||||||
% link to cypherpunks, hackers
|
|
||||||
% Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) are an example of such a political technology. The core function of HSMs is to
|
|
||||||
% protect cryptographic secrets against \emph{any} physical attack. Even though they are widely used in finance and
|
|
||||||
% business applications, in their design, they curiously embody the radical idiology of the cypherpunk and hacker
|
|
||||||
% movements.
|
|
||||||
%
|
|
||||||
% We believe physically secure devices like HSMs can be a keystone technology in the creation of secure systems for
|
|
||||||
% communication and computation in a free, democratic society. However, while current state-of-the art commercial
|
|
||||||
% devices can be expected to resist a fascist police force or even some authoritarian states' secret services, their
|
|
||||||
% physical security is still lacking due to misaligned ecosystem incentices. As Anderson put it,
|
|
||||||
% todo cite: betrusted
|
|
||||||
%
|
|
||||||
%
|
|
||||||
% Meanwhile in academia,
|
|
||||||
% In this thesis, we aim to significantly advance the field of hardware security module construction. We publish all
|
|
||||||
% designs, code and data as open source to create the groundwork for future research, and sow the seeds for a new
|
|
||||||
% generation of secure hardware that will be able to resist a rising tide of fascist and authoritarian movements.
|
|
||||||
%
|
|
||||||
%
|
|
||||||
%
|
|
||||||
% Research questions:
|
|
||||||
% 1. can hsm w/o proprietary mesh?
|
|
||||||
% 2. how do meshes look like in practice?
|
|
||||||
% 3. can we improve monitoring?
|
|
||||||
% 4. can we solve power transfer issue
|
|
||||||
% 5. applications
|
|
||||||
%
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\emph{No Gods, No Masters} is an anarchist slogan originating in the 19\textsuperscript{th} century that expresses a
|
\emph{No Gods, No Masters} is an anarchist slogan originating in the 19\textsuperscript{th} century that expresses a
|
||||||
rejection of authorities~\cite{broussaisOriginesDeviseAnarchiste2022,guerinNoGodsNo2005,blomNoGodsNo2025}. In modern
|
rejection of authorities~\cite{broussaisOriginesDeviseAnarchiste2022,guerinNoGodsNo2005,blomNoGodsNo2025}. Despite its
|
||||||
cryptography, it is generally seen as best practice to have the least amount of parties possible involved in any
|
origin in a different era, it encapsulates an approach that is commonly followed in modern cryptography. In
|
||||||
computation.
|
cryptography, it is considered best practice to have the least amount of parties possible involved in any computation.
|
||||||
Most cryptographic problems are easily solved by involving a trusted third party (TTP).
|
Most cryptographic problems are easily solved by involving a trusted third party (TTP). Yet, cryptographers have time
|
||||||
Yet, cryptographers have time and again vocally rejected attempts to involve third parties in cryptographic
|
and again vocally rejected attempts to involve third parties in cryptographic protocols~\cite{
|
||||||
protocols~\cite{
|
|
||||||
abelsonRisksKeyRecovery1997,
|
abelsonRisksKeyRecovery1997,
|
||||||
abelsonKeysDoormats2015,
|
abelsonKeysDoormats2015,
|
||||||
andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020,
|
andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020,
|
||||||
|
|
@ -72,8 +35,8 @@ and even general computation~\cite{
|
||||||
aumannSecurityCovertAdversaries2010,
|
aumannSecurityCovertAdversaries2010,
|
||||||
chorPrivateInformationRetrieval}
|
chorPrivateInformationRetrieval}
|
||||||
in a decentralized way that avoids trusted authorities.
|
in a decentralized way that avoids trusted authorities.
|
||||||
While politically, this blanket rejection of authority represents a fringe viewpoint, in cryptography it has a long
|
While politically, the anarchist blanket rejection of authority represents a fringe viewpoint, in cryptography it has a
|
||||||
tradition originating with the Cypherpunk and Hacker movements~\cite{
|
long tradition originating with the Cypherpunk and Hacker movements~\cite{
|
||||||
andersonCypherpunkEthicsRadical2022,
|
andersonCypherpunkEthicsRadical2022,
|
||||||
hughesCypherpunksManifesto,
|
hughesCypherpunksManifesto,
|
||||||
jarvisCryptoWarsFight2020,
|
jarvisCryptoWarsFight2020,
|
||||||
|
|
@ -86,7 +49,9 @@ systems are still routinely compromised~\cite{
|
||||||
goldmanUnrestrainedChineseCyberattackers2025,
|
goldmanUnrestrainedChineseCyberattackers2025,
|
||||||
scott-railtonWhoseAuthorityPegasus2024,
|
scott-railtonWhoseAuthorityPegasus2024,
|
||||||
quintinSomethingRememberUs2024,
|
quintinSomethingRememberUs2024,
|
||||||
marczakGraphiteCaughtFirst2025}.
|
marczakGraphiteCaughtFirst2025,
|
||||||
|
PredatorFilesTechnical2023,
|
||||||
|
PakistanMassSurveillance2025}.
|
||||||
A fundamental flaw of any practical cryptographic system is that secure algorithms have to run on hardware, and even
|
A fundamental flaw of any practical cryptographic system is that secure algorithms have to run on hardware, and even
|
||||||
today, average computing hardware provides little physical security~\cite{
|
today, average computing hardware provides little physical security~\cite{
|
||||||
gotzfriedCacheAttacksIntel2017,
|
gotzfriedCacheAttacksIntel2017,
|
||||||
|
|
@ -95,11 +60,11 @@ today, average computing hardware provides little physical security~\cite{
|
||||||
moghimiTPMFAILTPMMeets2020}.
|
moghimiTPMFAILTPMMeets2020}.
|
||||||
\emph{Hardware Security Modules} are a class of devices specifically designed to execute cryptographic algorithms while
|
\emph{Hardware Security Modules} are a class of devices specifically designed to execute cryptographic algorithms while
|
||||||
providing strict physical security guarantees, but these systems are expensive,
|
providing strict physical security guarantees, but these systems are expensive,
|
||||||
and their physical security is often questionable (cf.~Chapter~\ref{chapter-survey})~\cite{
|
and their physical security is often questionable~\cite{
|
||||||
obermaier2018,
|
obermaier2018,
|
||||||
andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020}.
|
andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020},
|
||||||
As \textcite{andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020} writes on HSMs and their security standards:
|
which we will elaborate further in Chapter~\ref{chapter-survey}. \textcite{andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020} writes
|
||||||
% FIXME page numbers
|
on HSM security:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{quote}
|
\begin{quote}
|
||||||
Security economics remains a big soft spot, with security chips being in many ways a market for lemons. A banker
|
Security economics remains a big soft spot, with security chips being in many ways a market for lemons. A banker
|
||||||
|
|
@ -110,7 +75,6 @@ As \textcite{andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020} writes on HSMs and their secu
|
||||||
understand that level 3 can sometimes be defeated with a Swiss army knife. The buying incentive there is compliance,
|
understand that level 3 can sometimes be defeated with a Swiss army knife. The buying incentive there is compliance,
|
||||||
and where real security clashes with operations it’s not surprising to see weaker standards designed to make
|
and where real security clashes with operations it’s not surprising to see weaker standards designed to make
|
||||||
compliance easier.
|
compliance easier.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{flushright}
|
\begin{flushright}
|
||||||
\textit{\textcite{andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020} p. 629}
|
\textit{\textcite{andersonSecurityEngineeringGuide2020} p. 629}
|
||||||
\end{flushright}
|
\end{flushright}
|
||||||
|
|
@ -128,74 +92,101 @@ cryptographic engineering is Kerckhoffs' principle\footnote{
|
||||||
as well as a translation of the cited part from French. The original source is
|
as well as a translation of the cited part from French. The original source is
|
||||||
\textcite{kerckhoffsCryptographieMilitaire1883}.
|
\textcite{kerckhoffsCryptographieMilitaire1883}.
|
||||||
}, named after Dutch military cryptographer Auguste Kerckhoffs. Kerckhoffs' principle expresses that the security of a
|
}, named after Dutch military cryptographer Auguste Kerckhoffs. Kerckhoffs' principle expresses that the security of a
|
||||||
cryptographic system should only depend on the secrecy of its keys, not on the secrecy of its design. In this way,
|
cryptographic system should only depend on the secrecy of its keys, not on the secrecy of its design. Existing
|
||||||
Kerckhoff's principle states the opposite of the widespread industry practice of \emph{Security by Obscurity}, which
|
commercial designs routinely contravene Kerckhoff's principle by applying the widespread industry practice of
|
||||||
aims to achieve security by making it sufficiently costly to cryptoanalyze a system that the attempt becomes
|
\emph{Security by Obscurity}. Even in academic related work, the principle is sometimes violated by omitting
|
||||||
unattractive. All existing commercial HSM designs as well as some existing academic related work violate this principle
|
implementation and methodological details in the interest of patents and commercial exploitation. By publishing all
|
||||||
by keeping details of their implementation such as the precise mesh dimensions and manufacturing methods secret. By
|
details of our research into HSMs and their components, we provide the foundation for future independent research.
|
||||||
publishing all details of our research into HSMs and their components, we provide the foundation for future independent
|
|
||||||
research.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Complementary to Kerckhoff's principle is the principle of least authority, which describes that in a secure system each
|
Beyond applying Kerckhoffs' principle, publishing our design also enables independent replication. Our design is
|
||||||
component should only have access to the smallest set of capabilities necessary to fulfill its purpose. Applying both to
|
based entirely on standard components and does not require bespoke manufacturing processes. Both commercial and academic
|
||||||
a cryptographic system means that the system's design should be transparent and not include any hidden components or
|
existing HSM tamper sensing designs require bespoke manufacturing methods or custom integrated circuits
|
||||||
opaque parts that cannot be inspected, and that the system's keys should be scoped to place the least amount of trust
|
(ICs)~\cite{
|
||||||
possible in each participating party. Existing HSMs are an example of a violation of the principle of least authority
|
obermaierPUFfilmMethodProducing2023,
|
||||||
since they elevate the HSM manufacturer to a single point of failure. The tamper sensing mesh foils used in conventional
|
immler2019,
|
||||||
HSMs are made in proprietary, bespoke processes, and cannot be manufactured independently. Our proposed design can be
|
garbTamperSensitiveDesignPUFBased,
|
||||||
replicated from standard components and eliminates this issue.
|
immlerBTREPIDBatterylessTamperresistant2018}. Custom ICs require a large up-front financial commitment to produce.
|
||||||
|
Bespoke manufacturing methods may require custom machines, training, and specialty materials, also incurring a high
|
||||||
|
startup cost. This creates a single point of failure in the manufacturer, and opens up an opportunity for a hardware
|
||||||
|
supply-chain attack~\cite{harrisonSoKSecurityArchitects2025}. Such supply chain attacks can be mitigated by
|
||||||
|
independently manufacturing our design.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Research Questions and Contributions}
|
%%%
|
||||||
|
\section{A Note on Hardware Security Module Terminology}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Based on the current state of the field of hardware security, we deduce three overarching research questions for this
|
In this thesis, we use the term \emph{Hardware Security Module (HSM)} to refer to a security device that has the
|
||||||
thesis that progress from theory to practical deployment.
|
following three properties.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||||
\item Can we achieve physical security without relying on conventional tamper-sensing meshes?
|
\item A HSM targets the prevention of any conceivable physical attack. In particular, this includes intrusion attempts
|
||||||
\item Can we monitor tamper-sensing meshes at a higher detail level than the state of the art of a single, scalar
|
such as careful drilling or cutting into the device from any direction.
|
||||||
measurement?
|
\item A HSM includes tamper sensors that when triggered result in an active tamper response, usually deleting all
|
||||||
\item Can we create the support components necessary to integrate a system that provides a practical security
|
cryptographic secrets and rendering the device inoperable.
|
||||||
guarantee?
|
\item A HSM's tamper sensing and response subsystem is continuously powered from a backup power supply, usually a
|
||||||
|
battery. Loss of power triggers the tamper response.
|
||||||
\end{enumerate}
|
\end{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To answer our first research question, we propose the Inertial Hardware Security Module (IHSM), a new type of HSM that
|
This use of the term \emph{HSM} aligns with common usage of the term both in the academic literature and in everyday
|
||||||
extends the high level of protection offered by the modern cryptographic software stack down to the hardware level,
|
conversation. Particularly the requirement of active tamper detection and response is crucial to distinguish a HSM from
|
||||||
enabling secure computation in insecure places.
|
simpler devices such as TPMs, smart cards or secure enclaves in SoCs. Note that our use of the term HSM is slightly
|
||||||
|
different from its use in government standards, from its use in the PCI SSC (Payment Card Industry Security Standards
|
||||||
|
Council) standards, and from its industry use.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To answer our second question, we propose improvements to the state of the art in HSM tamper sensors such as the use of
|
In industry, the term HSM is often used for solutions that are only logically segregated and that do not include any
|
||||||
low-cost, embeddable Time-Domain Reflectometry (TDR) that not only improve the security of IHSMs, but that can even be
|
particular defense against hardware attacks. Our conjecture is that this is a consequence of the standardization
|
||||||
applied to conventional HSMs.
|
landscape, where for applications outside of card payment processing the US FIPS
|
||||||
|
140-22~\cite{usnationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnologySecurityRequirementsCryptographic2002} standard was central to
|
||||||
|
the industry. Despite encompassing both devices that include active tamper detection and response, FIPS 140-2 did not
|
||||||
|
draw a distinction in its terminology between the two classes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Finally, we answer our last research question by showing in two case studies how an end-to-end design of an IHSM-secured
|
\subsection{Use in government standards}
|
||||||
data processing system could look like. Both case studies concern scenarios that IHSMs unlock that were previously
|
|
||||||
infeasible using conventional HSMs: Datacenter-scale Secure Multiparty Computation (SMPC) and long-range Quantum Key
|
|
||||||
Distribution (QKD) networks. As part of this effort we provide a solution adapting and improving upon the state of the
|
|
||||||
art in wireless power transfer to supply a rotating inertial HSM with a clean, stable power supply.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We chose to publish all of our research as open source and unencumbered by patents to enable widespread adoption. IHSMs
|
Under the still widely used US national standard FIPS 140 in in its 2002 version
|
||||||
can be custom built with only basic manufacturing capabilities at small scale and enable the deployment of secure
|
2~\cite{usnationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnologySecurityRequirementsCryptographic2002}, a HSM would be called a
|
||||||
computation in insecure places even to small organizations such as university research departments, NGOs and small
|
\emph{Multiple-Chip Cryptographic Module} that conforms to the standard's \emph{Security Level} 4 out of 4. Interesting
|
||||||
businesses.
|
to note are that only level 4 requires any active tamper detection and response, so devices compliant only up to levels
|
||||||
|
3 and below do not align with our HSM definition. Futher of note is that according to the standard, a single-chip
|
||||||
|
solution does not require any tamper detection and response either to meet the standard's security level 4, which is in
|
||||||
|
misalignment with our definition. The standard's 2019 updated version FIPS
|
||||||
|
140-3~\cite{usnationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnologySecurityRequirementsCryptographic2019} defers to the
|
||||||
|
international standards ISO/IEC 19790 and 24759.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%\section{Cryptographic Principles and Physical Reality}
|
ISO/IEC 19790~\cite{ISOIEC19790} and ISO/IEC 24759~\cite{ISOIEC24759} call what we call a HSM a \emph{Hardware
|
||||||
|
Cryptographic Module} corresponding with the standards \emph{Security Level 4}. However, these standards only require
|
||||||
|
active tamper detection and response when cryptographic secrets are transmitted in plaintext between chips.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%Let's take a basic videoconferencing system as an example. In our example system's deployment, users log on to a central
|
\subsection{Use in card payment processing (PCI SSC) standards}
|
||||||
%conference server, which receives and distributes the users' video streams. Allowing backdoor access to the video
|
|
||||||
%streams to some third party like a datacenter operator or a state would violate Kerckhoffs' principle since it would
|
|
||||||
%have to be hidden from the systems' participants, who would therefore not have a complete view of the systems' deployed
|
|
||||||
%architecture. The principle of least authority would also be violated since in almost all cases, such a backdoor access
|
|
||||||
%system would not see legitimate use. As a result, it would possess capabilities that almost never would be essential to
|
|
||||||
%the proper function of the videoconference system.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%In their design, almost all modern software -- especially open source -- cleanly applies these principles. However, the
|
The Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) is an association of credit card network operators that
|
||||||
%practical reality after deployment almost always deviates from them. While backdoors are vanishingly rare in modern
|
defines standards for all layers of card payment processing, from card payment terminals in stores to the handling of
|
||||||
%open-source software, practical deployments usually are vulnerable to physical attacks. Computer hardware generally is
|
payment data in online shop backend systems.
|
||||||
%not designed with a local attacker with advanced physical attack capabilities in mind since no mitigation can fully
|
|
||||||
%prevent them---such attacks usually can only be detected, or at best slowed down. As a result, commonplace attacks
|
PCI SSC terminology aligns with our definition and with common everyday use of the term HSM. In PCI SSC terminology, a
|
||||||
%against modern software often involve taking over the hardware at some point in the chain. Even End-to-End-Encrypted
|
HSM is a crytographic device that has active tamper detecion and response circuitry. However, PCI SSC terminology
|
||||||
%(E2EE) communication systems can be compromised if one of the encrypted channel's endpoints can be physically
|
differs from our use of the term HSM in one nuance: In PCI SSC terminology, a HSM is specifically a datacenter device
|
||||||
%compromised. Corresponding \emph{digital forensics} capabilities are commonplace among state actors, and are available
|
used for backend processing of payment data. The general class of ``hardware devices performing some security function
|
||||||
%as a turnkey solution on the market.
|
with or without particular physical security requirements'' that ISO/IEC 19790 and other standards call a \emph{Hardware
|
||||||
|
Cryptographic Module}, in PCI SSC terminology is termed \emph{Secure Cryptographic Device (SCD)} in more recent standard
|
||||||
|
versions, which was updated from the previous term \emph{Tamper-Resistant Security Module (TRSM)}. Other than HSMs, PCI
|
||||||
|
SSC includes smartcards and card payment terminals in this category. Card payment terminals, referred to as
|
||||||
|
\emph{Pin-Entry Device (PED)} in PCI SSC standards, have to include a surprising amount of active tamper detection and
|
||||||
|
response functionality including partial coverage of areas like their main cryptographic processor and smart card reader
|
||||||
|
by battery-backed tamper-sensing meshes. Under our definition, these devices can be classified as a type of HSM.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\subsection{Tamper-Sensing Meshes}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In this thesis, we use the terms \emph{Tamper-Sensing Mesh} and \emph{Security Mesh} synonymous. We use both terms to
|
||||||
|
refer to any electrical circuit whose path is laid out to cover a surface with the intent of detecting attempts at
|
||||||
|
drilling, cutting or otherwise manipulating this surface. While the term \emph{Security Mesh} is more concise, it is
|
||||||
|
less clear to people unfamiliar with the matter. It is also polysemous, and depending on context can also refer to woven
|
||||||
|
or stamped metal meshes used as fences or as screens in front of windows to prevent break-ins. As a result, it is harder
|
||||||
|
to use in online searches, and when using Large Language Models (LLMs), it frequently leads to amusing hallucinations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% FIXME note leo: Das ganze wirkt wie ein guter baustein für eine Einleitung. Für einen Terminologie übersicht ist es
|
||||||
|
% ansonsten auch eigentlich zu lang.
|
||||||
|
% Splitte das vielleicht auf, ein paar mehr details in den Abstract um die HSM definition etwas zu präzisieren, den rest
|
||||||
|
% in die Intro?
|
||||||
|
%%%
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Inertial Hardware Security Modules}
|
\section{Inertial Hardware Security Modules}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -218,26 +209,110 @@ IHSMs are a new design approach that utilizes mechanical motion to create secure
|
||||||
components. IHSMs solve the issue of creating an impenetrable tamper-sensing envelope by replacing the bespoke
|
components. IHSMs solve the issue of creating an impenetrable tamper-sensing envelope by replacing the bespoke
|
||||||
tamper-sensing mesh foil with a set of simple, rigid meshes made from commodity Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs) that are
|
tamper-sensing mesh foil with a set of simple, rigid meshes made from commodity Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs) that are
|
||||||
rotating at high speed. In motion, these simple PCB tamper-sensing meshes are as secure as the much more sophisticated
|
rotating at high speed. In motion, these simple PCB tamper-sensing meshes are as secure as the much more sophisticated
|
||||||
bespoke foils used in conventional HSMs, yet they are simpler and less expensive to manufacture. To verify that the mesh
|
bespoke foils used in conventional HSMs against an attacker with access to commercially available tools, yet they are
|
||||||
is rotating correctly, an accelerometer is placed on the rotating mesh, and its centrifugal force reading is used to
|
simpler and less expensive to manufacture. To verify that the mesh is rotating correctly, an accelerometer is placed on
|
||||||
validate its path of motion.
|
the rotating mesh, and its centrifugal force reading is used to validate its path of motion.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
IHSMs enable the protection of much larger payloads compared to conventional mesh designs, and they can support larger
|
IHSMs enable the protection of much larger payloads compared to conventional mesh designs, and they can support larger
|
||||||
power dissipation. Combined with their low cost, this enables the implementation of high-level hardware security in
|
power dissipation. Combined with their low cost, this enables the implementation of high-level hardware security in
|
||||||
applications that previously would not have been possible to secure.
|
applications that previously would not have been possible to secure.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
IHSMs are the first fully open source HSM with advanced tamper sensing features. Across application domains, IHSMs can
|
To the best of our knowledge, IHSMs are the first fully open source, replicable HSM with advanced tamper sensing
|
||||||
be applied to gain resistance to physical attacks in scenarios where conventional HSMs were not used because of cost,
|
features. Across application domains, IHSMs can be applied to gain resistance to physical attacks in scenarios where
|
||||||
computing power or implementation effort. Where conventional HSMs come as fully integrated devices that only expose
|
conventional HSMs were not used because of cost, computing power or implementation effort. Where conventional HSMs come
|
||||||
limited APIs to their users, IHSMs at their core are just an enclosure that the user can put whatever hardware they need
|
as fully integrated devices that only expose limited APIs to their users, IHSMs at their core are just an enclosure that
|
||||||
into, adapting the tamper response to their application's needs. Since the simpler tamper-sensing mesh construction of
|
the user can put whatever hardware they need into, adapting the tamper response to their application's needs. Since the
|
||||||
IHSMs scales to larger payload volumes, entire servers can be protected---something that is impossible with conventional
|
simpler tamper-sensing mesh construction of IHSMs scales to larger payload volumes, entire servers can be
|
||||||
HSMs. Since the mesh in an IHSM is constantly moving, unlike a mesh in a conventional HSM, it does not have to entirely
|
protected---something that is impossible with conventional HSMs. Since the mesh in an IHSM is constantly moving, unlike
|
||||||
cover the payload. Instead, it can have gaps that allow for air flow between outside and inside, enabling active cooling
|
a mesh in a conventional HSM, it does not have to entirely cover the payload. Instead, it can have gaps that allow for
|
||||||
of the IHSM's payload. This cooling capability sharply increases computing power by increasing feasible payload power
|
air flow between outside and inside, enabling active cooling of the IHSM's payload. This cooling capability increases
|
||||||
dissipation by two orders of magnitude.
|
computing power by increasing feasible payload power dissipation by orders of magnitude~\cite{kordyban1998}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Conclusion}
|
\section{Research Questions and Contributions}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Based on the current state of the field of hardware security, we deduce six overarching research questions for this
|
||||||
|
thesis that progress from theory to practical deployment.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
\item What is the state of the art in commercial tamper sensing mesh implementations?
|
||||||
|
\item What are criteria and approaches for the design of secure tamper sensing meshes?
|
||||||
|
\item Can we achieve physical security without relying on a conventional tamper-sensing meshes that requires a
|
||||||
|
bespoke manufacturing process?
|
||||||
|
\item Can we monitor tamper-sensing meshes at a higher detail level than the state of the art of a single, scalar
|
||||||
|
measurement?
|
||||||
|
\item Can we improve the ripple voltage performance of Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) through rotating joints to
|
||||||
|
adapt it to IHSM applications?
|
||||||
|
\item What applications does our IHSM technology open up through its increase in power dissipation and size
|
||||||
|
capabilities?
|
||||||
|
\end{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We answer our first research question in two parts. In Chapter~\ref{chapter-epa}, we analyze the hardware security
|
||||||
|
design of Germany's new national electronic health record system. Our analysis unveils a combination of problematic
|
||||||
|
choices resulting from conflicting constraints and lack of awareness. In Chapter~\ref{chapter-survey}, we present the
|
||||||
|
results of a survey across approximately 30 real world tamper sensing mesh implementations, analyzing common design
|
||||||
|
features.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The second half of our survey in Chapter~\ref{chapter-survey} answers our second research question. From our analysis of
|
||||||
|
a large corpus of devices, we deduce a list of design criteria that can be applied to increase the security of any
|
||||||
|
tamper sensing mesh implementation. To answer our third research question, in Chapter~\ref{chapter-ihsm} we propose the
|
||||||
|
Inertial Hardware Security Module (IHSM), a new type of HSM that extends the high level of protection offered by the
|
||||||
|
modern cryptographic software stack down to the hardware level, enabling secure computation in insecure places. IHSMs
|
||||||
|
can be built from basic, off-the-shelf components and do not require bespoke manufacturing processes. To answer our
|
||||||
|
fourth research question, in Chapter~\ref{chapter_sampling_mesh_mon} we propose improvements to the state of the art in
|
||||||
|
HSM tamper sensors based on the use of low-cost, embeddable Time-Domain Reflectometry (TDR). Our improvements can be
|
||||||
|
applied to both IHSMs and to conventional HSMs. IHSMs come with unique power supply constraints since their rotating
|
||||||
|
mesh must be continuously powered. A straightforward solution utilizes Wireless Power Transfer using planar inductors,
|
||||||
|
but existing WPT designs exhbit a ripple voltage due to an asymmetry of conventional planar inductors. This leads to our
|
||||||
|
fifth research question, which we solve in Chapter~\ref{chapter-nice-coils} with the design and experimental evaluation
|
||||||
|
of a new, generalized class of \emph{twisted} planar inductors that reduces voltage ripple in rotating shaft setups.
|
||||||
|
A finding of independent interest is that compared to conventional two-layer planar inductors, in our experiments our
|
||||||
|
proposed inductor design improved self-resonant frequency by up to \qty{50}{\percent} and increased inductance by up to
|
||||||
|
\qty{6.5}{\percent}. Finally, we answer our last research question by showing in two case studies how an end-to-end
|
||||||
|
design of an IHSM-secured data processing system could look like. Both case studies concern scenarios that IHSMs unlock
|
||||||
|
that were previously infeasible using conventional HSMs: In Chapter~\ref{chapter-qkd}, we explore how IHSMs enable
|
||||||
|
long-range Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) networks using trustable physically secured relay nodes and in
|
||||||
|
Chapter~\ref{chapter-smpc} we elaborate how datacenter-scale Secure Multiparty Computation (SMPC) clusters can be
|
||||||
|
created using IHSM enclosures with commercial server hardware.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\section{Contributions}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Through this thesis, we make contributions advancing the state of hardware securty across several related sub-fields.
|
||||||
|
Our contributions include:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
\item We conduct the first large-scale survey of tamper sensing measures in the real world, analyzing approximately
|
||||||
|
30 devices.
|
||||||
|
\item From our real world observations, we systematize tamper sensing mesh construction techniques and we provide a
|
||||||
|
list of criteria improving mesh security.
|
||||||
|
\item We experimentally analyze the impact of Computed Tomography (CT) imaging on mesh security.
|
||||||
|
\item We propose the IHSM, a new concept for HSM design based on a rotating mesh that increases payload size and
|
||||||
|
power dissipation capacity while simultaneously allowing for simpler meshes constructed from standard
|
||||||
|
components.
|
||||||
|
\item We show experimental results on IHSM mesh performance obtained with a prototype IHSM.
|
||||||
|
\item We introduce an algorithm for the automatic layout of tamper-sensing meshes and its implementation on top of a
|
||||||
|
popular, open-source Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tool.
|
||||||
|
\item We introduce a high-fidelity mesh monitoring approach that uses Time-Domain Reflectometry (TDR).
|
||||||
|
\item We show a low-cost implementation of our TDR monitoring approach.
|
||||||
|
\item We evaluate the performance of our TDR monitoring implementation and demonstrate its response to a large
|
||||||
|
set of attacks. We show that it reliably distinguishes identical copies of the same mesh specimen, suggesting
|
||||||
|
PUF-like behavior.
|
||||||
|
\item We introduce a generalized design approach for low-loss planar inductors that out-peform prior approaches in
|
||||||
|
parasitic capacitance, self-resonant frequency and rotational symmetry.
|
||||||
|
\item We apply our design approach to the problem of Wireless Power Transfer to the rotating mesh of an IHSM.
|
||||||
|
\item We conduct an exhaustive experimental evaluation of the rotational symmetry of a large set of planar WPT
|
||||||
|
inductors created using our approach.
|
||||||
|
\item We analyze physically secure Quantum Key Distribution relays as an IHSM use case and develop a low-loss fiber
|
||||||
|
optic passthrough that supports an additional, secondary, independently rotating mesh shielding the shaft
|
||||||
|
passthrough of the IHSM's primary mesh.
|
||||||
|
\item We explore IHSMs for co-located high performance Multiparty Computation (MPC) setups. We demonstrate a
|
||||||
|
fan-driven IHSM mesh concept for high-availability scenarios that removes motors as a single point of failure
|
||||||
|
while providing sufficient airflow for cooling high-power server components.
|
||||||
|
\end{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We chose to publish all of our research as open source and unencumbered by patents to enable widespread adoption. IHSMs
|
||||||
|
can be custom built with only basic manufacturing capabilities at small scale and enable the deployment of secure
|
||||||
|
computation in insecure places even to small organizations such as university research departments, NGOs and small
|
||||||
|
businesses.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Looking at the practice of applied hardware security, we observe that despite ample availability of commercial solutions
|
Looking at the practice of applied hardware security, we observe that despite ample availability of commercial solutions
|
||||||
promising easy hardware security, clearly there is still a lack of solutions that provide the adaptability necessary for
|
promising easy hardware security, clearly there is still a lack of solutions that provide the adaptability necessary for
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -22,8 +22,9 @@ any misalignment or contamination by dust can increase wear and cause intermitta
|
||||||
An IHSM's data link can easily be realized using optical communication. Although power transfer using light is also
|
An IHSM's data link can easily be realized using optical communication. Although power transfer using light is also
|
||||||
possible---and we have in fact demonstrated it in our first prototype IHSM---it comes at the disadvantage of a heavy
|
possible---and we have in fact demonstrated it in our first prototype IHSM---it comes at the disadvantage of a heavy
|
||||||
rotating assembly since large solar cells are needed, and it has poor end-to-end efficiency. For the large-scale meshes
|
rotating assembly since large solar cells are needed, and it has poor end-to-end efficiency. For the large-scale meshes
|
||||||
needed in a high-performance IHSM tailored to SMPC applications, we engineered a better solution: A rotation-invariant
|
needed in a high-performance IHSM such as one tailored to SMPC applications as we will propose later in
|
||||||
inductive Wireless Power Transfer link.
|
Chapter~\ref{chapter-smpc}, we engineered a better solution: A rotation-invariant inductive Wireless Power Transfer
|
||||||
|
link.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
While Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) is widely used and can be implemented in many different ways~\cite{
|
While Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) is widely used and can be implemented in many different ways~\cite{
|
||||||
awuahNovelCoilDesign2023,
|
awuahNovelCoilDesign2023,
|
||||||
|
|
@ -120,15 +121,16 @@ rotation ripple at low turn counts.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Twisted inductors}
|
\subsection{Twisted inductors}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To solve these issues, we propose a layout for circular PCB inductors that uses a number of series-connected interleaved
|
To solve these issues, in this chapter we propose a layout for circular PCB inductors that uses a number of
|
||||||
spirals to achieve a topological equivalent to a torus knot from mathematical knot theory. Our layout twists the
|
series-connected interleaved spirals to achieve a topological equivalent to a torus knot from mathematical knot theory.
|
||||||
inductor's windings around one another by connecting the interleaved spiral segments with a ring of vias each on the
|
Our layout twists the inductor's windings around one another by connecting the interleaved spiral segments with a ring
|
||||||
inside and outside of the inductor's windings. Our approach provides better performance beyond our particular use case,
|
of vias each on the inside and outside of the inductor's windings. Our approach provides better performance beyond our
|
||||||
and improves over conventional contemporary planar inductors applying similar principles to those which inspired the
|
particular use case, and improves over conventional contemporary planar inductors applying similar principles to those
|
||||||
polygonal basket-woven air coils used in early radio sets. We show that we can layout a twisted inductor for any number
|
which inspired the polygonal basket-woven air coils used in early radio sets. We show that we can layout a twisted
|
||||||
of layer inversions that is co-prime to the inductor's turn count. Our approach opens up a design space for inductor
|
inductor for any number of layer inversions that is co-prime to the inductor's turn count. Our approach opens up a
|
||||||
layouts that interpolate between planar spiral inductors on one end, and planar toroidal inductors on the other end. Our
|
design space for inductor layouts that interpolate between planar spiral inductors on one end, and planar toroidal
|
||||||
approach thus generalizes a super-set to a number of previous approaches to the design of planar inductors.
|
inductors on the other end. Our approach thus generalizes a super-set to a number of previous approaches to the design
|
||||||
|
of planar inductors.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We observe that in high-frequency applications, a moderate number of layer inversions increases the spacing between the
|
We observe that in high-frequency applications, a moderate number of layer inversions increases the spacing between the
|
||||||
beginning and end of the inductor's conductor, where the majority of the inductor's AC current flows. This decreases the
|
beginning and end of the inductor's conductor, where the majority of the inductor's AC current flows. This decreases the
|
||||||
|
|
@ -154,6 +156,10 @@ Our contributions on this matter include:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Related Work}
|
\section{Related Work}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In this section we will give an overview on related work from two primary angles. First, we will approach our question
|
||||||
|
from the application side, examining literature on Wireless Power Transfer. To conclude, we will then consider our
|
||||||
|
inductor design question from the fundamentals of inductor design.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Inductive WPT in Practice}
|
\subsection{Inductive WPT in Practice}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Inductive WPT has been proposed in a large number of
|
Inductive WPT has been proposed in a large number of
|
||||||
|
|
@ -271,11 +277,11 @@ voltage differential.
|
||||||
The connecting order of turns was optimized at the assembly level by stacking coils in a particular
|
The connecting order of turns was optimized at the assembly level by stacking coils in a particular
|
||||||
way~\cite{flemingPrinciplesElectricWave1910} and at the component level by winding coils in a particular way to minimize
|
way~\cite{flemingPrinciplesElectricWave1910} and at the component level by winding coils in a particular way to minimize
|
||||||
the voltage differential between adjacent turns---a technique that is still used to this
|
the voltage differential between adjacent turns---a technique that is still used to this
|
||||||
day~\cite{lopeFirstSelfResonant2021}. The main winding optimization in the first category concerns winding the
|
day~\cite{lopeFirstSelfresonantFrequency2021}. The main winding optimization in the first category concerns winding the
|
||||||
turns of a cylindrical multilayer inductor not layer by layer, but instead layering them diagonally, effectively
|
turns of a cylindrical multilayer inductor not layer by layer, but instead layering them diagonally, effectively
|
||||||
connecting adjacent turns in a diagonal zigzag pattern. Then as now, wound inductors applying this technique were not
|
connecting adjacent turns in a diagonal zigzag pattern. Then as now, wound inductors applying this technique were not
|
||||||
feasible to manufacture reliably by machine, but the technique can be closely replicated in PCB inductors as shown in
|
feasible to manufacture reliably by machine, but the technique can be closely replicated in PCB inductors as shown in
|
||||||
\textcite{leePrintedSpiralWinding2011a}. The main limiting factors in a PCB implementation are the requirement for a
|
\textcite{leePrintedSpiralWinding2011}. The main limiting factors in a PCB implementation are the requirement for a
|
||||||
large number of vias inside the inductor's turns limiting the achievable turn count\footnote{In PCBs, as opposed to
|
large number of vias inside the inductor's turns limiting the achievable turn count\footnote{In PCBs, as opposed to
|
||||||
integrated circuits (ICs), vias limit the achievable turn count when they need to be placed in-line inside the turns as
|
integrated circuits (ICs), vias limit the achievable turn count when they need to be placed in-line inside the turns as
|
||||||
opposed to on the inside or outside because a PCB's minimum trace/space widths are usually much smaller than the
|
opposed to on the inside or outside because a PCB's minimum trace/space widths are usually much smaller than the
|
||||||
|
|
@ -373,7 +379,7 @@ two core observations:
|
||||||
\end{description}
|
\end{description}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Setting the inversion count to $k=1$ in our proposed scheme yields the conventional two-layer counterwound
|
Setting the inversion count to $k=1$ in our proposed scheme yields the conventional two-layer counterwound
|
||||||
scheme~\cite{lopeFirstSelfResonant2021,sproHighVoltageInsulationDesign2021,leePrintedSpiralWinding2011a}.
|
scheme~\cite{lopeFirstSelfresonantFrequency2021,sproHighVoltageInsulationDesign2021,leePrintedSpiralWinding2011}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure}
|
\begin{figure}
|
||||||
\begin{center}
|
\begin{center}
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ requirements of a QKD system.
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this chapter, we present several designs and a mechanical prototype adapting the Inertial Hardware Security Module
|
In this chapter, we present several designs and a mechanical prototype adapting the Inertial Hardware Security Module
|
||||||
(IHSM) concept first proposed by \textcite{gotteCantTouchThis2022} to a QKD relay node. IHSMs replace the tamper sensing
|
(IHSM) concept that we developed in Chapter~\ref{chapter-ihsm} to a QKD relay node. IHSMs replace the tamper sensing
|
||||||
security mesh foil that is wrapped around the payload in conventional HSMs by a tamper-sensing cage made from
|
security mesh foil that is wrapped around the payload in conventional HSMs by a tamper-sensing cage made from
|
||||||
conventional circuit board material by spinning this cage at a high speed. On its own, circuit board material provides
|
conventional circuit board material by spinning this cage at a high speed. On its own, circuit board material provides
|
||||||
lower tamper security than the tamper sensing foils made using bespoke manufacturing processes that are used in
|
lower tamper security than the tamper sensing foils made using bespoke manufacturing processes that are used in
|
||||||
|
|
@ -242,14 +242,15 @@ common fibers is usually in the range of
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Multi-fiber passthrough design}
|
\subsection{Multi-fiber passthrough design}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To approach the security of the data and power connections passing through the IHSM's unprotected shaft,
|
To approach the security of the data and power connections passing through the IHSM's unprotected shaft, in our
|
||||||
\textcite{gotteCantTouchThis2022} list some shielding methods that use an independently rotating secondary tamper
|
introduction of the IHSM concept in Chapter~\ref{chapter-ihsm} we listed some shielding methods that use an
|
||||||
sensing mesh on the inside of the primary mesh, located right next to the primary mesh's axis opening. This secondary
|
independently rotating secondary tamper sensing mesh on the inside of the primary mesh, located right next to the
|
||||||
mesh makes accessing the payload using probes inserted through the shaft much more difficult.
|
primary mesh's axis opening. This secondary mesh makes accessing the payload using probes inserted through the shaft
|
||||||
\textcite{gotteCantTouchThis2022} only present conceptual drawings of these schemes, and focus on electrical signals. In
|
much more difficult. In our introduction in Chapter~\ref{chapter-ihsm}, we only presented conceptual drawings of these
|
||||||
this chapter, building on these concepts, we present mechanical designs of three variations of a fiber passthrough for
|
schemes, and focused on electrical signals. In this chapter, building on these concepts, we present mechanical designs
|
||||||
IHSMs that are adapted to the limited bending radius of optical fiber: A simple disc cover, offset labyrinth meshes, and
|
of three variations of a fiber passthrough for IHSMs that are adapted to the limited bending radius of optical fiber: A
|
||||||
interlocking gear meshes. We present a mechanical prototype of our offset labyrinth mesh design.
|
simple disc cover, offset labyrinth meshes, and interlocking gear meshes. We present a mechanical prototype of our
|
||||||
|
offset labyrinth mesh design.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Simple disc cover}
|
\subsection{Simple disc cover}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -461,11 +462,11 @@ the amount of inter-mesh space necessary for power and data feedthroughs as well
|
||||||
meshes, on the other hand, this pitch increases by the offset distance. Even for a small offset this quickly adds up to
|
meshes, on the other hand, this pitch increases by the offset distance. Even for a small offset this quickly adds up to
|
||||||
an unwieldy total mesh size.
|
an unwieldy total mesh size.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this section, we conceptually introduce a solution to this problem that allows for larger offsets using a design
|
We conceptually introduce a solution to this problem that allows for larger offsets using a design where the two meshes
|
||||||
where the two meshes interlock like gears. This does mean that the two meshes' rotation must be synchronized, but it
|
interlock like gears. This does mean that the two meshes' rotation must be synchronized, but it increases the design
|
||||||
increases the design space of offset labyrinth meshes. For instance, in a gear setup, the wide sides of the inter-mesh
|
space of offset labyrinth meshes. For instance, in a gear setup, the wide sides of the inter-mesh zones can be aligned
|
||||||
zones can be aligned to lie on the same side, so fiber passthrough can be realized more easily even without the need to
|
to lie on the same side, so fiber passthrough can be realized more easily even without the need to spiral the fiber
|
||||||
spiral the fiber around the axes of rotation.
|
around the axes of rotation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Mesh synchronization}
|
\subsection{Mesh synchronization}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -474,78 +475,33 @@ In this setup, the mesh tabs act like gear teeth. Depending on the ratio between
|
||||||
meshes do not have to rotate at the same rate of rotation and harmonic ratios are possible. Additionally, unlike actual
|
meshes do not have to rotate at the same rate of rotation and harmonic ratios are possible. Additionally, unlike actual
|
||||||
gears which need to constantly maintain an area of contact, both co-rotating and counter-rotating setups are possible.
|
gears which need to constantly maintain an area of contact, both co-rotating and counter-rotating setups are possible.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Physical attacks and countermeasures}
|
|
||||||
\label{sec_attacks}
|
|
||||||
In this section we will consider possible ways to attack an IHSM-secured QKD relay, as well as potential
|
|
||||||
countermeasures.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Attacks on the IHSM mesh}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
There are two ways an attacker could attack the mesh itself if an adequate speed of rotation such as \qty{1000}{\rpm} is
|
|
||||||
used~\cite{gotteCantTouchThis2022}: Either, an attacker would have to slow down the mesh so they can perform a manual
|
|
||||||
attack, or they would have to use a robot. The first class of attack would require the attacker to falsify the readings
|
|
||||||
of the centrifugal accelerometer. MEMS accelerometers are complex devices, and the simplest way to falsify its readings
|
|
||||||
would be to attach a circuit to the accelrometer's data bus that overrides the measurement result data. Creating such a
|
|
||||||
circuit is easy, the challenge the attacker would have to overcome would be to access this bus and attach this circuit
|
|
||||||
to the mesh in motion without stopping or disturbing it. At high speeds, this would necessarily require a custom attack
|
|
||||||
robot.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Contactless attacks on the payload}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Contactless attacks such as electromagnetic (EM) side-channel attacks or optical fault injection attacks on the payload
|
|
||||||
could conceivably be conducted from the outside of the mesh. The efficacy of EM side-channel as well as fault injection
|
|
||||||
attacks decays quickly with increased distance between probe and target, and they can be counteracted by simply placing
|
|
||||||
the QKD relay's components such that they are spaced apart from the mesh. Optical attacks, on the other hand can be
|
|
||||||
carried out even at a distance using appropriate focusing optics. The easiest way to prevent such attacks would be to
|
|
||||||
place the payload into an opaque enclosure inside the mesh.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
An additional variant of optical attacks would be using a laser to cut or drill into the payload. Such attacks can be
|
|
||||||
impeded through several defense-in-depth measures. First, the payload QKD relay should be designed such that destroying
|
|
||||||
any part of it such as connecting wires or fibers causes it to fail secure. Irrespective of attacks, this is a
|
|
||||||
reasonable design objective anyway given that components could fail, and a component failure should never put the device
|
|
||||||
in an insecure state. Further, similar to other optical attacks, a shield can be used to prevent laser cutting or
|
|
||||||
drilling attacks as well with the only difference being the kind of shield. To prevent laser cutting or drilling, a
|
|
||||||
thick metal shield can be used. The large thermal mass, high thermal conductivity and reflective surface of such a
|
|
||||||
shield makes it difficult to cut. There are lasers such as pulsed Nd:YAG lasers that can cut even thick steel, but these
|
|
||||||
this cutting produces a large amount of metal plasma and debris, which would likely destroy the payload in the process.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To make sure any active laser attack is quickly detected, as a final line of defense, both mesh and payload should
|
|
||||||
include wideband optical sensors in their array of environmental tamper sensors. For instace, high-power pulsed lasers
|
|
||||||
do not deposit much heat into their target because the surface of the target is vaporized by the laser pulse too
|
|
||||||
quickly, and thus might not trigger a simple temperature alarm inside the payload. In contrast, optical sensors even
|
|
||||||
outside of the laser's wavelength range would have no trouble detecting the light emitted from the metal plasma created
|
|
||||||
by the laser's pulses on impact with the payload.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Fast, mechanical attacks on the payload}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A final class of attacks are mechanical attacks where an attacker mechanically compromises the IHSM QKD relay so quickly
|
|
||||||
that the tamper alarm mechanism has no time to act. An instance of such an attack would be using a gun to fire a bullet
|
|
||||||
at the payload, aiming to selectively destroy parts of it that are involved in tamper alarm response before they can
|
|
||||||
act. This class of attack can be counteracted in similar ways as the previously mentioned optical attacks. Destruction
|
|
||||||
of parts of the payload should never let it fall into an insecure state, meaning that such an attack alone should never
|
|
||||||
be enough to compromise the QKD relay. There is little one can do to prevent destruction of the payload by projectile or
|
|
||||||
by explosive, but a thick metal shield around the payload would make it more difficult to selectively target part of it
|
|
||||||
using a projectile.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Outlook}
|
\section{Outlook}
|
||||||
\label{sec_outlook}
|
\label{sec_outlook}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Achievable security guarantees}
|
\subsection{Achievable security guarantees}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Like conventional HSMs, Inertial HSMs are only ever an engeineering answer to a security question. In contrast with
|
Like conventional HSMs, Inertial HSMs are only ever an engineering answer to a security question. In contrast with
|
||||||
cryptographic solutions that can achieve provable, information-theoretic security in some cases, an IHSM's security
|
cryptographic solutions that in some cases can achieve provable, information-theoretic security, an IHSM's security
|
||||||
rests upon an assumption on the engineering capabilities of an attacker. In contrast to conventional HSMs, which
|
rests upon an assumption on the engineering capabilities of an attacker. In contrast to conventional HSMs, which
|
||||||
achieve this engineering assumption through the manufacture of hard-to-manipulate tamper sensing meshes, Inertial HSMs
|
achieve this engineering assumption through the manufacture of hard-to-manipulate tamper sensing meshes, Inertial HSMs
|
||||||
achieve it by rotating their tamper sensing mesh. In a conventional HSM, increasing the security of the tamper sensing
|
achieve it by rotating their tamper sensing mesh. In a conventional HSM, increasing the security of the tamper sensing
|
||||||
mesh requires fine-tuning a bespoke manufacturing process. In contrast, increasing the security of an IHSMs simply
|
mesh requires fine-tuning a bespoke manufacturing process. In contrast, increasing the security of an IHSMs simply
|
||||||
requires making the rotor faster.
|
requires making the rotor faster.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
While QKD systems provide theroetically impervious security guarantees based on fundamental laws of physics, they too
|
||||||
|
are engineered systems embedded into a macroscopic world. As such, while the physics at their core might be sound
|
||||||
|
similar to how the cryptography at the heart of a HSM might be provable, like HSMs they also cannot side-step requiring
|
||||||
|
engineering solutions to security questions at the system level. As such, IHSMs complement QKD implementations, and
|
||||||
|
provide the system-level security barrier necessary for the protection of a QKD node's quantum components.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Trust bootstrapping}
|
\subsection{Trust bootstrapping}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A key question in any trusted hardware deployment is how to bootstrap trust in a new device when faced with the
|
When considering the security of a system, we often assume a steady state, where the system is already secure at the
|
||||||
possibility of supply-chain attacks. Conventional HSMs are only manufactured by a single manufacturer, and the common
|
start and then needs to resist some attack. A key question in any practical trusted hardware deployment is how to
|
||||||
solution is to just trust that manufacturer. The HSM's manufacturer can factory-provision an identity key to the HSM
|
bootstrap this initial trust in a new device when faced with the possibility of supply-chain attacks. Conventional HSMs
|
||||||
that can be used to ascertain the HSM's integrity during shipping to the customer.
|
are only manufactured by a single manufacturer, and the common solution is to just trust that manufacturer. The HSM's
|
||||||
|
manufacturer can factory-provision an identity key to the HSM that can be used to ascertain the HSM's integrity during
|
||||||
|
shipping to the customer.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
One of the key components of IHSM technology is that it does not require specialized components, or potting of the
|
One of the key components of IHSM technology is that it does not require specialized components, or potting of the
|
||||||
payload. While an IHSM could be manufactured and sold as a complete unit like a conventional HSM, their more modular
|
payload. While an IHSM could be manufactured and sold as a complete unit like a conventional HSM, their more modular
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ it.}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Introduction}
|
\section{Introduction}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\sourceattrib{This chapter is adapted from a paper written by me that will be presented by me at CHES
|
\sourceattrib{This part is adapted from a paper written by Jan Sebastian Götte and Prof.\ Dr.\ Björn Scheuermann that
|
||||||
2026~\cite{gotteHighFidelitySecurity2026}.}
|
will be presented by Jan Sebastian Götte at CHES 2026~\cite{gotteHighFidelitySecurity2026}.}
|
||||||
Security meshes continue to be the state of the art for tamper sensing in applications where sophisticated physical
|
Security meshes continue to be the state of the art for tamper sensing in applications where sophisticated physical
|
||||||
attacks such as attempts at drilling or sawing through the device's enclosure to place probes must be prevented. Common
|
attacks such as attempts at drilling or sawing through the device's enclosure to place probes must be prevented. Common
|
||||||
applications for such meshes include Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) used to store and process cryptographic keys
|
applications for such meshes include Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) used to store and process cryptographic keys
|
||||||
|
|
@ -19,15 +19,18 @@ two or more conductive traces that are laid out in a meandering pattern to cover
|
||||||
electrically monitors these traces to detect attempts at penetrating this surface.
|
electrically monitors these traces to detect attempts at penetrating this surface.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As is often the case with security technologies, in practice a tension exists between the level of security offered by a
|
As is often the case with security technologies, in practice a tension exists between the level of security offered by a
|
||||||
particular security mesh implementation and its implementation cost. Commercial designs often only coarsely monitor the
|
particular security mesh implementation and its implementation cost. In Chapter~\ref{chapter-survey}, we have examined a
|
||||||
conductivity of the mesh traces and are incapable of detecting attacks that manipulate small parts of the mesh. The most
|
broad range of real-world security meshes. We found that the majority of implementations use simple construction
|
||||||
|
approaches and coarse structure sizes, which results in limited security when only monitoring macroscopic parameters of
|
||||||
|
the mesh such as electrical continuity or resistance. The coarse monitoring approaches based on trace continuity that
|
||||||
|
are used in many commercial designs are incapable of detecting attacks that manipulate small parts of the mesh. The most
|
||||||
secure meshes are made in custom manufacturing processes. Materials such as polymer substrates are specifically chosen
|
secure meshes are made in custom manufacturing processes. Materials such as polymer substrates are specifically chosen
|
||||||
such that the mesh is difficult to manipulate without breaking it. A drawback of this approach is that the specialized
|
such that the mesh is difficult to manipulate without breaking it. A drawback of this approach is that the specialized
|
||||||
manufacturing processes are difficult to replicate and that the resulting cost of the mesh is high. In some
|
manufacturing processes are difficult to replicate and that the resulting cost of the mesh is high~\cite{isaacs2013}. In
|
||||||
lower-security applications such as card payment terminals, simpler approaches are still commonly used for their ease of
|
some lower-security applications such as card payment terminals, simpler approaches are still commonly used for their
|
||||||
implementation. Often, standard copper/polyimide Flexible Printed Circuits (FPCs) or even standard Printed Circuit
|
ease of implementation. Often, standard copper/polyimide Flexible Printed Circuits (FPCs) or even standard Printed
|
||||||
Boards (PCBs) are used because of the wide availability of manufacturing services.
|
Circuit Boards (PCBs) are used because of the wide availability of
|
||||||
\todo{Integrate new scope plots!}
|
manufacturing services.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Inertial HSMs are one approach that enables the use of less expensive, commodity materials in high-security
|
Inertial HSMs are one approach that enables the use of less expensive, commodity materials in high-security
|
||||||
applications. Several other academic approaches exist that target low-cost~\cite{
|
applications. Several other academic approaches exist that target low-cost~\cite{
|
||||||
|
|
@ -45,7 +48,7 @@ applications. Several other academic approaches exist that target low-cost~\cite
|
||||||
High-performance mesh monitoring approaches try to characterize the mesh's physical properties with high accuracy, but
|
High-performance mesh monitoring approaches try to characterize the mesh's physical properties with high accuracy, but
|
||||||
often come at the cost of specialized, expensive circuitry. Low-cost approaches utilize advanced analog techniques in
|
often come at the cost of specialized, expensive circuitry. Low-cost approaches utilize advanced analog techniques in
|
||||||
their circuitry to extract precise measurements using few components. They trade off measurement precision for lower
|
their circuitry to extract precise measurements using few components. They trade off measurement precision for lower
|
||||||
component cost. Besides simple monitoring, detecting tamper attempts by replacing the mesh with a macro-scale Physically
|
component cost. Besides simple monitoring, detecting tamper attempts by replacing the mesh with a macro-scale Physical
|
||||||
Unclonable Function (PUF) has also been researched~\cite{
|
Unclonable Function (PUF) has also been researched~\cite{
|
||||||
immlerBTREPIDBatterylessTamperresistant2018,
|
immlerBTREPIDBatterylessTamperresistant2018,
|
||||||
staatAntiTamperRadioSystemLevel2022,
|
staatAntiTamperRadioSystemLevel2022,
|
||||||
|
|
@ -148,8 +151,8 @@ blind spots.
|
||||||
obermaierMeasurementSystemCapacitive2018,
|
obermaierMeasurementSystemCapacitive2018,
|
||||||
garbTamperSensitiveDesignPUFBased}
|
garbTamperSensitiveDesignPUFBased}
|
||||||
propose one of the most advanced security mesh designs in the current academic state of the art. They use a specialized
|
propose one of the most advanced security mesh designs in the current academic state of the art. They use a specialized
|
||||||
security mesh as a Physically Unclonable Function (PUF), combining tamper sensing with cryptographic key storage. In
|
security mesh as a Physical Unclonable Function (PUF), combining tamper sensing with cryptographic key storage. In their
|
||||||
their design, the mesh consists of a cross-hatch pattern made from several dozen individually addressable capacitive
|
design, the mesh consists of a cross-hatch pattern made from several dozen individually addressable capacitive
|
||||||
electrodes. They manufacture their meshes in a specialized process that results in unpredictable, random variations in
|
electrodes. They manufacture their meshes in a specialized process that results in unpredictable, random variations in
|
||||||
capacitance between electrodes. They propose an analog frontend that measures the precise mutual capacitance of each
|
capacitance between electrodes. They propose an analog frontend that measures the precise mutual capacitance of each
|
||||||
pair of electrodes~\cite{obermaierMeasurementSystemCapacitive2018} using an approach similar to
|
pair of electrodes~\cite{obermaierMeasurementSystemCapacitive2018} using an approach similar to
|
||||||
|
|
@ -753,7 +756,47 @@ its switching happens in the short period between its input differential voltage
|
||||||
combined forward voltage of the Schottky diodes. Thus, while the \partno{74LVC} might produce slow edges overall, its
|
combined forward voltage of the Schottky diodes. Thus, while the \partno{74LVC} might produce slow edges overall, its
|
||||||
large output swing results in a high slew rate in the critical region around the zero crossing.
|
large output swing results in a high slew rate in the critical region around the zero crossing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We observed the best result overall with the \partno{PI3HDX12211} redriver, resulting in a rise time of
|
\begin{figure}
|
||||||
|
\begin{center}
|
||||||
|
\begin{subfigure}{0.45\textwidth}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{edge_sampling_pulse_scope.pdf}
|
||||||
|
\vspace*{-5mm}
|
||||||
|
\caption{Sampling pulse}
|
||||||
|
\label{fig_osc_risetime_samp}
|
||||||
|
\end{subfigure}
|
||||||
|
\unskip\begin{subfigure}{0.45\textwidth}
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{edge_stimulus_pulse_scope_normalized.pdf}
|
||||||
|
\vspace*{-5mm}
|
||||||
|
\caption{Stimulus pulse}
|
||||||
|
\label{fig_osc_risetime_stim}
|
||||||
|
\end{subfigure}
|
||||||
|
\end{center}
|
||||||
|
\vspace*{-5mm}
|
||||||
|
\caption[Pulse risetime oscilloscope measurements]{Oscilloscope measurements of the sampling pulse probed
|
||||||
|
differentially (left) and of the stimulus pulse probed single-ended and normalized (right). The 74LVC pulse is
|
||||||
|
plotted on the right Y axis in the left plot due to its large amplitude. In the right plot, it is not shown
|
||||||
|
since our measurement setup did not allow for a measurement of this amplitude.}
|
||||||
|
\label{fig_osc_risetime}
|
||||||
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Figure~\ref{fig_osc_risetime} shows the sampling and stimulus pulse edges measured using a Siglent SDS7404A
|
||||||
|
\qty{4}{\giga\hertz} oscilloscope. The stimulus pulse was directly measured single-ended, and the sampaling pulse was
|
||||||
|
measured differentially through a Siglent SAP2500D \qty{2.5}{\giga\hertz} active differential probe. These measurements
|
||||||
|
support the conclusion from Figure~\ref{fig_spec_risetime} that in raw edge risetime, \partno{MAX3748} and
|
||||||
|
\partno{TDP0604} perform fastest, with \partno{PI3HDX12211} being slightly slower. They also exhibit the large
|
||||||
|
differences in amplitude that we expect cause the differences in actual measurement performance as shwon in
|
||||||
|
Figure~\ref{fig_edge_risetime}. Note that due to the differences in measurement methodology, a direct comparison of the
|
||||||
|
rise times is not possible between these plots. The spectrum measurements do not convey amplitude information and
|
||||||
|
discard low-frequency content, but due to the very large bandwidth of the spectrum analyzer used, they will represent
|
||||||
|
the true risetime the closest. In both the self-characterization and the oscilloscope measurements, the displayed
|
||||||
|
risetime is contaminated by the measurement system. In case of the self-characterization, the stimmulus rise time is
|
||||||
|
folded into the measurement result, leading in the displayed risetime being slower by a factor of $\sqrt{2}$. Similarly,
|
||||||
|
in the oscilloscope measurements, the combined risetime of the oscilloscope frontend and active probe contaminate the
|
||||||
|
results.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We observed the best overall performance with the \partno{PI3HDX12211} redriver, resulting in a rise time of
|
||||||
\qty{264}{\pico\second}. In this test specimen, we fed the pulse through the amplifier twice since we had two unused
|
\qty{264}{\pico\second}. In this test specimen, we fed the pulse through the amplifier twice since we had two unused
|
||||||
channels, and we used \qty{200}{\pico\second} clip lines on the amplifier's output for pulse shaping. We only used clip
|
channels, and we used \qty{200}{\pico\second} clip lines on the amplifier's output for pulse shaping. We only used clip
|
||||||
lines here and for \partno{TDP0604} since the other amplifiers' output did not contain sufficient harmonic content.
|
lines here and for \partno{TDP0604} since the other amplifiers' output did not contain sufficient harmonic content.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -805,7 +848,7 @@ lines here and for \partno{TDP0604} since the other amplifiers' output did not c
|
||||||
\qty{2.86}{\meter}&
|
\qty{2.86}{\meter}&
|
||||||
\qty{3.86}{\meter}\\
|
\qty{3.86}{\meter}\\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\textbf{Approximate Delay}&
|
\textbf{Approx. Delay}&
|
||||||
\qty{7.1}{\nano\second}&
|
\qty{7.1}{\nano\second}&
|
||||||
\qty{13}{\nano\second}&
|
\qty{13}{\nano\second}&
|
||||||
\qty{19}{\nano\second}&
|
\qty{19}{\nano\second}&
|
||||||
|
|
@ -819,13 +862,13 @@ lines here and for \partno{TDP0604} since the other amplifiers' output did not c
|
||||||
\label{tab_mesh_spec}
|
\label{tab_mesh_spec}
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To measure the practical performance of our prototype, we created a set of tamper sensing mesh test specimens. Each
|
To measure the practical performance of our prototype, we created a set of tamper sensing mesh test specimens using the
|
||||||
specimen contains four separate meshes with the same area. Table~\ref{tab_mesh_spec} shows the design specifications.
|
algorithm described in Chapter~\ref{chapter-ihsm}. Each specimen contains four separate meshes with the same area.
|
||||||
Each specimen contains four separate meshes on the outer layers of a four-layer, \qty{1.0}{\milli\meter} thickness PCB,
|
Table~\ref{tab_mesh_spec} shows the design specifications. Each specimen contains four separate meshes on the outer
|
||||||
two equal-size meshes on each side. The inner layers were used as ground. Figure\ \ref{fig_mesh_length} shows the
|
layers of a four-layer, \qty{1.0}{\milli\meter} thickness PCB, two equal-size meshes on each side. The inner layers were
|
||||||
results of a baseline measurement of each mesh using each design variant. The step response resulting from an edge
|
used as ground. Figure\ \ref{fig_mesh_length} shows the results of a baseline measurement of each mesh using each design
|
||||||
entering the mesh and its reflection arriving back at the start after traversing the mesh back and forth is clearly
|
variant. The step response resulting from an edge entering the mesh and its reflection arriving back at the start after
|
||||||
visible.
|
traversing the mesh back and forth is clearly visible.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We validated the results from Figure\ \ref{fig_mesh_length} by calculating speed of light in our mesh specimen's
|
We validated the results from Figure\ \ref{fig_mesh_length} by calculating speed of light in our mesh specimen's
|
||||||
substrate based on them. The resulting measurements are shown in Table\ \ref{tab_speed_of_light}. All amplifier
|
substrate based on them. The resulting measurements are shown in Table\ \ref{tab_speed_of_light}. All amplifier
|
||||||
|
|
@ -865,7 +908,7 @@ switching.
|
||||||
2&
|
2&
|
||||||
3&
|
3&
|
||||||
4&
|
4&
|
||||||
Calculated speed of light $c$
|
Calculated $c$
|
||||||
\\\hline
|
\\\hline
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\partno{PI3HDX12211}&
|
\partno{PI3HDX12211}&
|
||||||
|
|
@ -897,8 +940,8 @@ switching.
|
||||||
$\qty{1.59d8}{\meter\per\second}$\\
|
$\qty{1.59d8}{\meter\per\second}$\\
|
||||||
\end{tabular}
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
\end{center}
|
\end{center}
|
||||||
\caption[Speed of light calculations]{Speed of light and time offset calculated from delays read from the graphs in
|
\caption[Speed of light calculations]{Speed of light $c$ and time offset calculated from delays read from the graphs
|
||||||
Figure\ \ref{fig_mesh_length}. $c$ is the speed of light determined by linear fit.}
|
in Figure\ \ref{fig_mesh_length}. $c$ is the speed of light determined by linear fit.}
|
||||||
\label{tab_speed_of_light}
|
\label{tab_speed_of_light}
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||||
Subproject commit b4dc58286d039b1d0f70ea86f9e1f2cc538d8fbb
|
Subproject commit cd33cff0e8b3284f26a4b87c9c9d40ae226dceed
|
||||||
|
|
@ -5,34 +5,39 @@
|
||||||
were a necessary precondition for the legalization of same sex marriage. This is also why those maintaining
|
were a necessary precondition for the legalization of same sex marriage. This is also why those maintaining
|
||||||
positions of power will always encourage the freedom to talk about ideas, but never to act.}
|
positions of power will always encourage the freedom to talk about ideas, but never to act.}
|
||||||
\chaptertitle{Case Study: Multiparty Computation in Scalable Hardware Security Modules}
|
\chaptertitle{Case Study: Multiparty Computation in Scalable Hardware Security Modules}
|
||||||
|
\label{chapter-smpc}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Inertial Hardware Security Modules do not only support much larger payloads compared to conventional HSMs, they also
|
Inertial Hardware Security Modules do not only support much larger payloads compared to conventional HSMs, they also
|
||||||
support much higher power dissipation since they allow for direct air cooling of their payload. Because they rotate at
|
support much higher power dissipation since they allow for direct air cooling of their payload. The tamper-sensing
|
||||||
high speed, IHSM meshes do not need to be contiguous to provide adequate security. While a non-contiuous rotating mesh
|
membrane of a conventional HSM must be continuous to provide security, so any heat dissipated by the payload must pass
|
||||||
might theoretically allow a stationary attack tool to quickly penetrate, then retract through one of the mesh's gaps
|
through it. Since the polymers used in tamper sensing membranes are poor conductors of heat, and since security benefits
|
||||||
while the mesh is rotating, the time available for such an attack would be too short for a practical attack. For a mesh
|
from a thicker tamper sensing assembly (cf.\ Chapter~\ref{chapter-survey}), power dissipation in conventional HSMs is
|
||||||
with three vertical connecting segments (cf.\ Figure~\ref{fig_proto_mesh} in Chapter~\ref{chapter-ihsm}) rotating at
|
limited~\cite{
|
||||||
\qty{1000}{\rpm}, this time would be in the order of \qty{20}{\milli\second}. Conventional HSM monitoring circuits often
|
petriePartIITechnical,
|
||||||
require a similar amount of time to react to an attack~\cite{obermaier2018}.
|
curetHardwareSecurityModule2025,
|
||||||
|
zhangTamperrespondentAssembliesPorous2023,
|
||||||
|
dragoneVentedTamperrespondentAssemblies2020}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Similar to how the increase in payload \emph{size} unlocks new applications such as the Quantum Key Distribution relay
|
Because IHSMs rotate at high speed, IHSM meshes do not need to be contiguous to provide adequate security. While a
|
||||||
use case we presented in Chapter~\ref{chapter-qkd}, this increase in sustainable power dissipation by a factor of
|
non-contiguous rotating mesh might theoretically allow a stationary attack tool to quickly penetrate, then retract
|
||||||
several hundred also unlocks a number of new applications. Especially applications that require large amounts of
|
through one of the mesh's gaps while the mesh is rotating, the time available for such an attack would be too short for
|
||||||
computing power benefit from IHSM technology, as their needs fundamentally cannot be met by conventional HSMs.
|
a practical attack (cf.\ Chapter~\ref{chapter-ihsm}). For a mesh with three vertical connecting segments (cf.\
|
||||||
|
Figure~\ref{fig_proto_mesh} in Chapter~\ref{chapter-ihsm}) rotating at \qty{1000}{\rpm}, this time would be in the order
|
||||||
|
of \qty{20}{\milli\second}. Conventional HSM monitoring circuits would likely require a similar amount of time to react
|
||||||
|
to an attack~\cite{obermaier2018}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Similar to how the increase in payload \emph{size} of IHSMs compared to conventional HSMs unlocks new applications such
|
||||||
|
as the Quantum Key Distribution relay use case we presented in Chapter~\ref{chapter-qkd}, the increase in sustainable
|
||||||
|
power dissipation enabled by air cooling also unlocks a number of new applications. Especially applications that require
|
||||||
|
large amounts of computing power benefit from IHSM technology, as their needs fundamentally cannot be met by
|
||||||
|
conventional HSMs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
One such application that does not translate to conventional HSMs due to its need for large amounts of computing power
|
One such application that does not translate to conventional HSMs due to its need for large amounts of computing power
|
||||||
is Multiparty Computation (MPC). MPC is a cryptographic construct that allows several networked parties to jointly
|
is Multiparty Computation (MPC). MPC is a cryptographic construct that allows several networked parties to jointly
|
||||||
perform a computation in such a way that the inputs to the computation remain private to the parties providing them, and
|
perform a computation in such a way that the inputs to the computation remain private to the parties providing them, and
|
||||||
no single party must be trusted for the computation to produce the correct result. Conceptually, MPC is similar to a
|
no single party must be trusted for the computation to produce the correct result. Conceptually, MPC is similar to a
|
||||||
secret sharing scheme that shares not just data, but computation between untrusted parties. The computation primitive
|
secret sharing scheme that shares not just data, but computation between untrusted parties. The computation primitive
|
||||||
MPC offers is a cryptographic answer to the question of how to bootstrap trust in a computing system.
|
MPC offers is a cryptographic tool for bootstrapping trust in a distributed computing system.
|
||||||
\todo{In this chapter, cite academic publications and patents on HSM cooling!}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%The most challenging scenarios in computing arise when multiple
|
|
||||||
%parties such as manufacturers and operators, servers and clients, or sellers and buyers need to interact through
|
|
||||||
%computation. In many practical situations, it is impossible to create a single computer that can be trusted by every
|
|
||||||
%participant. MPC is a generic solution to a multitude of such scenarios reducing the problem of creating a single,
|
|
||||||
%shared computer everyone can trust simultaneously to everyone creating their own computer that they only can trust.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We can deconstruct the problem of trust in computing into two largely disjunct parts: Establishing trust in a computing
|
We can deconstruct the problem of trust in computing into two largely disjunct parts: Establishing trust in a computing
|
||||||
system during its creation is one, and maintaining this trust throughout its life is the other. For the second part of
|
system during its creation is one, and maintaining this trust throughout its life is the other. For the second part of
|
||||||
|
|
@ -46,41 +51,43 @@ they cannot target all systems simultaneously and we give them too little time t
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A limitation of both approaches is that in either case, while the party creating or acquiring the system can trust it,
|
A limitation of both approaches is that in either case, while the party creating or acquiring the system can trust it,
|
||||||
they cannot prove its trustworthiness to other parties. MPC solves this issue by allowing every party to contribute
|
they cannot prove its trustworthiness to other parties. MPC solves this issue by allowing every party to contribute
|
||||||
their trusted system to the protocol, cryptographically bootstrapping common trust in the computation and its
|
their own trusted system to the protocol, cryptographically bootstrapping common trust in the computation and its
|
||||||
output\footnote{
|
output\footnote{
|
||||||
In fact, MPC does more than just bootstrapping from each participant trusting their own system to a trusted shared
|
In fact, MPC does more than just bootstrapping from each participant trusting their own system to a trusted shared
|
||||||
computation. In an MPC protocol providing semi-honest or better security, MPC even \emph{relaxes} each party's trust
|
computation. In an MPC protocol providing semi-honest or better security, MPC even \emph{relaxes} each party's trust
|
||||||
requirement from trusting their own system to trusting that any $n$-of-$k$ out of all systems contributing to the
|
requirement from trusting their own system to trusting any $n$-of-$k$ out of all systems contributing to the
|
||||||
protocol.
|
protocol.
|
||||||
}.
|
}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Fast MPC and Slow HSMs}
|
\section{Fast MPC and Slow HSMs}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
MPC is a uniquely powerful cryptographic primitive, yet it has still not found widespread practical adoption. This is
|
MPC is a uniquely powerful cryptographic primitive, yet it has still not found widespread practical adoption. To a large
|
||||||
because MPC is extremely resource-intensive to run. MPC protocols exist on a continuum trading off between extreme
|
extent, this is because MPC is extremely resource-intensive to run. MPC protocols exist on a continuum trading off
|
||||||
memory and bandwidth requirements on one end and intense computational requirements on the other end. At a first glance,
|
between extreme memory and bandwidth requirements on one end and intense computational requirements on the other end. At
|
||||||
MPC and Hardware Security Modules look like they would complement each other well, but HSMs cannot keep up with the
|
a first glance, MPC and Hardware Security Modules look like they would complement each other well, but HSMs cannot keep
|
||||||
intense computational requirements posed by MPC.
|
up with the computational requirements posed by MPC.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Using P-256 curve ECC key generation as a benchmark, commercially available HSMs are quoted to perform between 3500 and
|
Using P-256 curve ECC key generation as a benchmark, commercially available HSMs are quoted to perform between 3,500 and
|
||||||
22000 cryptographic operations per second~\cite{
|
22,000 cryptographic operations per second~\cite{
|
||||||
kumarIBMZ16Performance2025,
|
kumarIBMZ16Performance2025,
|
||||||
ThalesLunaNetwork2024,
|
ThalesLunaNetwork2024,
|
||||||
Utrust_GP_HSM_Se_Series_Datasheet_ENpdf,
|
Utrust_GP_HSM_Se_Series_Datasheet_ENpdf,
|
||||||
}. Meanwhile, an MPC protocol doing something as simple as a single AES encryption, corresponding to 7000 logic
|
}. Meanwhile, an MPC protocol doing something as simple as a single AES encryption, corresponding to 7,000 logic
|
||||||
gates~\cite{wangGlobalScaleSecureMultiparty2017}, requires tens of thousands of cryptographic operations when performed
|
gates~\cite{wangGlobalScaleSecureMultiparty2017}, requires tens of thousands of cryptographic operations when performed
|
||||||
in MPC. As a result, applying conventional HSMs to MPC at any practical scale is infeasible by multiple orders of
|
in MPC. As a result, applying conventional HSMs to MPC at any practical scale is infeasible by multiple orders of
|
||||||
magnitude. Literature on MPC commonly uses server hardware as a platform for benchmarks.
|
magnitude. Literature on MPC commonly uses server hardware as a platform for benchmarks, which has power dissipation and
|
||||||
|
processing speeds well beyond that of conventional HSMs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
HSMs are slow compared to contemporary computers because they are limited in their power dissipation, and power
|
HSMs are slow compared to contemporary computers because they are limited in their power dissipation, and power
|
||||||
dissipation is largely proportional to processing speed. In the limited fields where HSMs have found commercial
|
dissipation is largely proportional to processing speed. In the limited fields where HSMs have found commercial
|
||||||
application, this limitation was never considered important and market forces pushing towards faster HSMs remain
|
application, this limitation was never considered important and market forces pushing towards faster HSMs appear to
|
||||||
light\todo{Can we find a citation here?}. Fundamentally, conventional HSMs must envelope the entire payload in a tamper
|
remain light with the issue receiving little attention in either academic or manufacturer publications on the topic.
|
||||||
sensing mesh to detect drilling attacks, but a tamper sensing mesh that is impermeable to a drill is also impermeable to
|
Fundamentally, conventional HSMs must envelope the entire payload in a tamper sensing mesh to detect drilling attacks,
|
||||||
air. As a result, any heat conducted from the HSMs processor to the outside world must pass through the mesh. At the
|
but a tamper sensing mesh that is impermeable to a drill is also impermeable to air. As a result, any heat conducted
|
||||||
same time, the mesh cannot be thinned either because thinning it would enable micro-drilling attacks. The result of
|
from the HSMs processor to the outside world must pass through the mesh. At the same time, the mesh cannot be thinned
|
||||||
these constraints is a high thermal resistance between the HSM's processor and an external heat sink, which limits
|
either because thinning it would enable micro-drilling attacks. The result of these constraints is a high thermal
|
||||||
maximum power dissipation to a fraction of what is achieved in modern CPUs or even GPUs.
|
resistance between the HSM's processor and an external heat sink, which limits maximum power dissipation to a fraction
|
||||||
|
of that of modern CPUs or even GPUs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A secondary limitation of conventional HSMs is that the highly specialized tamper sensing foils used in their
|
A secondary limitation of conventional HSMs is that the highly specialized tamper sensing foils used in their
|
||||||
construction often cannot be scaled to arbitray sizes without incurring unsustainable process yields due to the
|
construction often cannot be scaled to arbitray sizes without incurring unsustainable process yields due to the
|
||||||
|
|
@ -92,10 +99,9 @@ components such as memory, power supplies and any internal heat spreading compon
|
||||||
Inertial HSMs solve this issue since they allow their payload to be air cooled without compromising security, and they
|
Inertial HSMs solve this issue since they allow their payload to be air cooled without compromising security, and they
|
||||||
expand the feasible security boundary size from the several hundred milliliters offered by conventional HSMs to several
|
expand the feasible security boundary size from the several hundred milliliters offered by conventional HSMs to several
|
||||||
liters and more, enabling the integration of standard, off-the-shelf server components such as mainboards, CPUs, CPU
|
liters and more, enabling the integration of standard, off-the-shelf server components such as mainboards, CPUs, CPU
|
||||||
coolers, and power supplies. In this chapter, we will first provide a short overview of the theory of MPC before
|
coolers, and power supplies. In this chapter, we will first provide a short overview illustrating a basic MPC protocol
|
||||||
elaborating a design of an IHSM tailored to MPC tasks including performance calculations and unique design aspects. We
|
for context before elaborating a design of an IHSM tailored to MPC tasks. We will conclude with an outlook of
|
||||||
will conclude with an outlook of applications unlocked by our design as well as promising areas for future improvements
|
applications unlocked by our design as well as promising areas for future improvements of our design.
|
||||||
of our design.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{The Fundamentals of Multiparty Computation}
|
\section{The Fundamentals of Multiparty Computation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -122,7 +128,8 @@ real-world settings where parties do not have stable identities such as peer-to-
|
||||||
mostly interesting as a research tool since protocols assuming a semi-honest adversary can often be upgraded to covert
|
mostly interesting as a research tool since protocols assuming a semi-honest adversary can often be upgraded to covert
|
||||||
or malicious security at some performance tradeoff. In a practical setting, a semi-honest secure MPC protocol would not
|
or malicious security at some performance tradeoff. In a practical setting, a semi-honest secure MPC protocol would not
|
||||||
provide additional security over just having one party run the computation except in some situations where inadvertent
|
provide additional security over just having one party run the computation except in some situations where inadvertent
|
||||||
side-channel leakage is a concern.
|
side-channel leakage is a concern. Using HSMs to secure protocol participants' cryptographic computations complements
|
||||||
|
both the covert and malicious security models.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Oblivious Transfer}
|
\subsection{Oblivious Transfer}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -141,19 +148,17 @@ Transfer Extensions (OTe)\cite{ishaiExtendingObliviousTransfers2003}. Using OTe,
|
||||||
base Oblivious Transfer instances can be extended into an arbitrarily large number of Oblivious Transfer instances using
|
base Oblivious Transfer instances can be extended into an arbitrarily large number of Oblivious Transfer instances using
|
||||||
only invocations of a pseudo-random function (PRF) such as a cryptographic hash function.
|
only invocations of a pseudo-random function (PRF) such as a cryptographic hash function.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Boolean MPC with Yao's Garbled Circuits}
|
\subsection{A basic MPC protocol: Boolean MPC with Yao's Garbled Circuits}
|
||||||
% Yao's Garbled Circuits
|
|
||||||
Yao's Garbled Circuits (GC) protocol is one of the oldest Multiparty Computation protocols, dating back to the 1980ies.
|
As a basic example of the approach taken by MPC protocols, we will give a brief overview of Yao's Garbled Circuits (GC)
|
||||||
In Yao's GC, two parties jointly compute a function that is represented as a circuit of binary logic gates by evaluating
|
protocol. Yao's GC is one of the oldest Multiparty Computation protocols, dating back to the 1980ies. In Yao's GC, two
|
||||||
the circuit gate by gate. In Yao's GC, one party, generator, creates a random \emph{garbled} representation of the
|
parties jointly compute a function that is represented as a circuit of binary logic gates by evaluating the circuit gate
|
||||||
circuit and sends it to the other party, the evaluator, who computes its output. The core idea in Yao's GC is that every
|
by gate. In Yao's GC, one party, generator, creates a random \emph{garbled} representation of the circuit and sends it
|
||||||
wire $w_i$ in the circuit is assigned two random cryptographic secret keys $w_i^b$, called wire labels, one $w_i^0$ for
|
to the other party, the evaluator, who computes its output. The core idea in Yao's GC is that every wire $w_i$ in the
|
||||||
the logical value $0$ and one $w_i^1$ for the value $1$. The mapping from logic values to these keys is assigned
|
circuit is assigned two random cryptographic secret keys $w_i^b$, called wire labels, one $w_i^0$ for the logical value
|
||||||
randomly by the generator, and unknown to the evaluator~\cite{
|
$0$ and one $w_i^1$ for the value $1$. The mapping from logic values to these keys is assigned randomly by the
|
||||||
yaoHowGenerateExchange1986,
|
generator, and unknown to the
|
||||||
beaverComplexitySecureProtocols1990,
|
evaluator~\cite{yaoHowGenerateExchange1986,beaverComplexitySecureProtocols1990,evansPragmaticIntroductionSecure}.
|
||||||
evansPragmaticIntroductionSecure,
|
|
||||||
}.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Gates are represented in Yao's GC as truth tables with one row for every combination of input wire values. Each row of
|
Gates are represented in Yao's GC as truth tables with one row for every combination of input wire values. Each row of
|
||||||
these truth tables contains the output wire label (i.e. secret key) corresponding to the gate's logical output value for
|
these truth tables contains the output wire label (i.e. secret key) corresponding to the gate's logical output value for
|
||||||
|
|
@ -188,28 +193,8 @@ evaluations of a pseudorandom function such as a cryptographic hash or a cipher.
|
||||||
Garbled Circuit is many times slower than performing it in the clear. Intuitively, each single-bit gate in the garbled
|
Garbled Circuit is many times slower than performing it in the clear. Intuitively, each single-bit gate in the garbled
|
||||||
circuit results in several cryptographic operations with input and output sizes of dozens or hundreds of bits.
|
circuit results in several cryptographic operations with input and output sizes of dozens or hundreds of bits.
|
||||||
Practically useful functions such as AES encryption have circuit implementations measuring thousands or tens of
|
Practically useful functions such as AES encryption have circuit implementations measuring thousands or tens of
|
||||||
thousands of gates, meaning these costs quickly escalate for practical problem sizes~\cite{
|
thousands of gates, meaning these costs quickly escalate for practical problem
|
||||||
boyarNewCombinationalLogic2010,
|
sizes~\cite{boyarNewCombinationalLogic2010, songhoriTinyGarbleHighlyCompressed2015}.
|
||||||
songhoriTinyGarbleHighlyCompressed2015,
|
|
||||||
}.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% FIXME This entire connecting section
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%\subsection{Practical Application}
|
|
||||||
%\subsubsection{Preprocessing and Online Phases}
|
|
||||||
%\subsubsection{Constant-Round MPC}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% \subsection{Performance}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% zahurTwoHalvesMake2015,wangGlobalScaleSecureMultiparty2017,kellerMPSPDZVersatileFramework2020,dalskovFantasticFourHonestMajority
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% \subsection{Practical Deployments}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% \subsection{Solutions}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% \subsection{Hardware Security Applied to MPC}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% Hardware security primitives can be applied in several roles in an MPC protocol.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{A High-Performance IHSM for MPC Applications}
|
\section{A High-Performance IHSM for MPC Applications}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -219,24 +204,17 @@ implemented using CPU processing. The technology comes with an unavoidable incre
|
||||||
each single plaintext computation or gate results in several cryptographic operations.
|
each single plaintext computation or gate results in several cryptographic operations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A naive implementation might attempt to implement MPC using an HSM by simply offloading all cryptographic operations to
|
A naive implementation might attempt to implement MPC using an HSM by simply offloading all cryptographic operations to
|
||||||
the HSM. In practice, this is not a workable solution due to the slow processing speed of conventional HSMs.
|
the HSM. In practice, this is not a workable solution due to the slow processing speed of conventional HSMs. In the near
|
||||||
Conventional HSMs use low-power embedded processors since their encapsulation using potting and security meshes impedes
|
term, absent radical developments in either MPC theory or in the speed and power efficiency of processing hardware, the
|
||||||
heat transfer, limiting power dissipation.
|
only feasible solution for HSM-protected MPC at any practical scale is to find a way to protect an entire server-class
|
||||||
|
computer. IHSMs are a natural fit for this requirement since they allow for large, air-cooled payloads.
|
||||||
In the near term, absent radical developments in either MPC theory or in the speed and power efficiency of processing
|
|
||||||
hardware, the only feasible solution for HSM-protected MPC at any practical scale is to find a way to protect an entire
|
|
||||||
server-class computer. As elaborated above, IHSMs are a natural fit for this requirement since they allow for large,
|
|
||||||
air-cooled payloads.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%\subsection{Hardware Requirements}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As a baseline performance target, we consider a commodity server mainboard in CEB or ATX form factor, populated with a
|
As a baseline performance target, we consider a commodity server mainboard in CEB or ATX form factor, populated with a
|
||||||
high-end server CPU and a large amount of RAM. As MPC systems do not usually require a great amount of storage, we can
|
high-end server CPU and a large amount of RAM. As MPC systems do not usually require a great amount of storage, we can
|
||||||
largely ignore storage for our size and power calculations.\todo{Refer to performance numbers from research above here}
|
largely ignore storage for our size and power calculations. As a result, we end up with a total maximum power
|
||||||
|
dissipation of approximately \qty{420}{\watt} as shown in Table~\ref{tab_power_budget}. Dissipating this amount of power
|
||||||
As a result, we end up with a total maximum power dissipation of approximately \qty{420}{\watt} as shown in
|
using air cooling is within the capabilities of commodity server cooling
|
||||||
Table~\ref{tab_power_budget}. Dissipating this amount of power using air cooling is within the capabilities of commodity
|
components~\cite{coroamaPossibleFutureTrends2025}.
|
||||||
server cooling components~\cite{coroamaPossibleFutureTrends2025}.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{table}
|
\begin{table}
|
||||||
\centering
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
|
@ -255,16 +233,16 @@ server cooling components~\cite{coroamaPossibleFutureTrends2025}.
|
||||||
A common type of side-channel attack on cryptographic systems are power analysis attacks. In such attacks, the supply
|
A common type of side-channel attack on cryptographic systems are power analysis attacks. In such attacks, the supply
|
||||||
current of the target processing system is measured at high speed while the target is performing cryptographic
|
current of the target processing system is measured at high speed while the target is performing cryptographic
|
||||||
computations. By aggregating the results of a large number of the resulting power traces, it is often possible to infer
|
computations. By aggregating the results of a large number of the resulting power traces, it is often possible to infer
|
||||||
the value of secret data such as cryptographic keys. To mitigate this type of attack, not only do we have to place the
|
the value of secret data such as cryptographic keys. To mitigate this type of attack, we propose placing the system's
|
||||||
CPU, mainboard, and memory inside of the HSM's tamper-sensing barrier, but also the power supply. A secondary benefit of
|
power supply inside the IHSM envelope. A secondary benefit of placing the power supply inside the tamper-sensing barrier
|
||||||
placing the power supply inside the tamper-sensing barrier is that it simplifies the power wiring between the outside of
|
is that it simplifies the power wiring between the outside of the IHSM cage and the payload. Supplying the
|
||||||
the IHSM cage and the payload. Supplying the \qty{12}{\volt} power rails that commodity mainboard commonly use requires
|
\qty{12}{\volt} power rails that commodity mainboard commonly use requires tens of Ampere. To carry such high current,
|
||||||
tens of Ampere. To carrie such high current, the wiring has to be sized accordingly. In an IHSM, even thick wires can
|
the wiring has to be sized accordingly. In an IHSM, even thick wires can easily be passed through the mesh cage, but
|
||||||
easily be passed through the mesh cage, but such wiring requires a large opening at the shaft on one end of the cage,
|
such wiring requires a large opening at the shaft on one end of the cage, which creates a literal security gap. Placing
|
||||||
which creates a literal security gap. Placing the power supply inside of the cage reduces the size of the wires needed
|
the power supply inside of the cage reduces the size of the wires needed since the power supply steps down a lower
|
||||||
since the power supply steps down a lower current \qty{240}{\volt} input to the system's high-current \qty{12}{\volt}
|
current \qty{240}{\volt} input to the system's high-current \qty{12}{\volt} rails. Using DIN VDE 0298-4\todo{Citation?}
|
||||||
rails. According to DIN VDE 0298-4\todo{Citation?}, a pair of \qty{1.5}{\milli\meter^2} conductors is sufficient for
|
as a reference, a pair of \qty{1.5}{\milli\meter^2} conductors is sufficient for more than \qty{3}{\kilo\watt} of load
|
||||||
more than \qty{3}{\kilo\watt} of load under worst-case conditions.
|
under worst-case conditions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Software Considerations}
|
\subsection{Software Considerations}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -286,31 +264,61 @@ software without effectively running a system emulation and incurring a massive
|
||||||
Intel and AMD contain hardware features that provide transparent DRAM encryption. These hardware features would be
|
Intel and AMD contain hardware features that provide transparent DRAM encryption. These hardware features would be
|
||||||
necessary when securing an entire sever in an MPC setup with IHSMS technology.
|
necessary when securing an entire sever in an MPC setup with IHSMS technology.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% \subsection{Fast Zeroization of Non-Customizable Memories}
|
|
||||||
% Thermite experiements and paper
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{A Joint Cooling and IHSM Envelope Powertrain}
|
\subsection{A Joint Cooling and IHSM Envelope Powertrain}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this section, we will present a sketch of a design for an IHSM envelope large enough to fit a small server mainboard,
|
In this section, we will present a sketch of a design for an IHSM envelope large enough to fit a small server mainboard,
|
||||||
and that provides air cooling to the payload. Our sketch solves the engineering issue of moving such an IHSM envelope
|
and that provides air cooling to the payload. Our sketch solves the engineering issue of moving such an IHSM envelope
|
||||||
while simultaneously providing cooling to the payload.
|
while simultaneously providing cooling to the payload.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% FIXME picture!
|
\begin{figure}
|
||||||
Our proposed design is based on the idea of using the cooling fans' airflow to power the rotation of the IHSM envelope.
|
\centering
|
||||||
Using the basic cylindrical design, the IHSM envelope consists of two discs above and below the payload that are
|
\begin{subfigure}{0.45\textwidth}
|
||||||
connected through vertical struts containing part of the tamper-sensing mesh on the outside of the payload. We propose
|
\centering
|
||||||
widening these vertical connecting struts, and angling them such that the entire envelope becomes a centrifugal
|
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{setup_0001.jpg}
|
||||||
impeller. By letting air flow into the envelope from the side, and back out through its top and bottom, the envelope
|
\caption{}
|
||||||
assumes the same configuration used in centrifugal cooling fans. A secondary advantage of this concept is that we do not
|
\label{fig_setup_left}
|
||||||
need a motor on the envelope's shaft, saving vertical space and one difficult to source part. Furthermore, the cooling
|
\end{subfigure}
|
||||||
fans can be located on the outside of the envelope in an easily accessible location, and can be set up in a redundant
|
\hspace*{5mm}
|
||||||
way such that a failed cooling fan can be replaced while the system continues operation. The only disadvantage of this
|
\begin{subfigure}{0.45\textwidth}
|
||||||
solution over a direct motor drive is noise. To achieve the speed necessary for sufficient security at the large
|
\centering
|
||||||
envelope diameter of an MPC accelerator application, high-airflow fans must be used, which are very noisy when at full
|
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{setup_0002.jpg}
|
||||||
speed. We consider this a valid tradeoff since such a system would be deployed in a datacenter where high noise levels
|
\caption{}
|
||||||
are acceptable.
|
\label{fig_setup_right}
|
||||||
|
\end{subfigure}
|
||||||
|
\caption{Conceptual demonstrator of the fan-driven IHSM primary mesh approach.}
|
||||||
|
\label{fig_setup}
|
||||||
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\todo{Finish sketch!}
|
Our proposed design is based on the idea of using the cooling fans' airflow to power the rotation of the IHSM envelope.
|
||||||
|
Figure~\ref{fig_setup} shows a conceptual demonstration of this approach. Using a basic cylindrical design, the IHSM
|
||||||
|
envelope consists of two discs above and below the payload that are connected through vertical struts on the outside of
|
||||||
|
the payload. We propose widening these vertical connecting struts, and angling them such that the entire envelope
|
||||||
|
becomes a centrifugal impeller. By letting air flow into the envelope from the side, and back out through its top and
|
||||||
|
bottom, the envelope assumes the same configuration used in centrifugal cooling fans. Tamper sensing meshes are placed
|
||||||
|
inside the vertical struts as well as along the horizontal discs at the top and at the bottom.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Laying out an IHSM this way has several advantages. First, we save some vertical space by removing the motor from the
|
||||||
|
shaft of the mesh. Second, on top of driving the mesh, the airflow also serves to cool the payload. Finally, this
|
||||||
|
approach eliminates the motor driving the mesh as a single point of failure. In a basic IHSM design as we introduced it
|
||||||
|
in Chapter~\ref{chapter-ihsm}, this motor is a critical component as its failure would lead to the mesh accelerometer
|
||||||
|
triggering the deceleration tamper alarm. Using a brushless motor type the number of wear components in this motor can
|
||||||
|
be reduced to the motor's shaft bearings. A complication in the practical manufacturing of IHSMs at a small scale is
|
||||||
|
that small-scale production does not allow for a custom-made motor. Limiting the selection to off-the-shelf brushless
|
||||||
|
motors leads to an unpredictability of bearing life due to the cost of precision bearings. Complicating things, bearing
|
||||||
|
specifications are not usually included in motor datasheets.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Compared to the market for off-the-shelf small brushless motors, cooling fans are easier to shop for. A large selection
|
||||||
|
of products with various form factors and specifications is available, and manufacturers usually give detailed
|
||||||
|
information on both performance and lifetime. Industrial and server cooling fans are commonly rated for uninterrupted
|
||||||
|
24/7 operation. The cooling fans can be located on the outside of the envelope in an easily accessible location. Like in
|
||||||
|
many servers, they can be set up in a redundant way such that a failed cooling fan can be replaced while the system
|
||||||
|
continues to operate.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The main drawback of a fan-driven IHSM is the amount of airflow necessary. To maximize payload volume, the fan blades
|
||||||
|
must be kept as narrow as possible. Narrow fan blades work best at high air speed, but high air speed requires the fan
|
||||||
|
to have high airflow. Besides limiting fan selection and increasing power consumption, high airflow fans also are noisy.
|
||||||
|
Despite these limitations, we consider fan-driven IHSMs a valid tradeoff since such a system would most likely be
|
||||||
|
deployed in a datacenter where high noise levels are acceptable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Outlook}
|
\section{Outlook}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
BIN
chapter-smpc/figures/setup_0001.jpg
Normal file
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 353 KiB |
BIN
chapter-smpc/figures/setup_0002.jpg
Normal file
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 316 KiB |
|
|
@ -7,11 +7,13 @@
|
||||||
\usepackage[
|
\usepackage[
|
||||||
backend=biber,
|
backend=biber,
|
||||||
style=numeric,
|
style=numeric,
|
||||||
|
backref=true,
|
||||||
natbib=true,
|
natbib=true,
|
||||||
url=false,
|
url=false,
|
||||||
doi=true,
|
doi=true,
|
||||||
eprint=false,
|
eprint=false,
|
||||||
refsegment=chapter,
|
refsegment=chapter,
|
||||||
|
date=iso,
|
||||||
]{biblatex}
|
]{biblatex}
|
||||||
\addbibresource{main.bib}
|
\addbibresource{main.bib}
|
||||||
\DeclareSourcemap{
|
\DeclareSourcemap{
|
||||||
|
|
@ -52,12 +54,20 @@
|
||||||
\ifdefined\thesispreviewmode %
|
\ifdefined\thesispreviewmode %
|
||||||
(draft \texttt{\input{version.tex}\unskip}) %
|
(draft \texttt{\input{version.tex}\unskip}) %
|
||||||
\fi %
|
\fi %
|
||||||
\leftmark}
|
\leftmark}
|
||||||
\fancyhead[OL]{\footnotesize\rightmark}
|
\fancyhead[OL]{\footnotesize%
|
||||||
|
\ifdefined\thesisoneside %
|
||||||
|
\leftmark%
|
||||||
|
\ifdefined\thesispreviewmode %
|
||||||
|
\\(draft \texttt{\input{version.tex}\unskip}) %
|
||||||
|
\fi %
|
||||||
|
\else%
|
||||||
|
\rightmark%
|
||||||
|
\fi}
|
||||||
\fancyhead[EL,OR]{\thepage}
|
\fancyhead[EL,OR]{\thepage}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\fancyfoot[LCR]{}
|
\fancyfoot[LCR]{}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\setlength{\headheight}{13.6pt}
|
||||||
\fancypagestyle{plain}{%
|
\fancypagestyle{plain}{%
|
||||||
\fancyhf{}%
|
\fancyhf{}%
|
||||||
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}%
|
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}%
|
||||||
|
|
@ -165,12 +175,45 @@
|
||||||
\printbibliography[nottype={online},nottype={patent},heading=subbibliography,resetnumbers=false,segment=\therefsegment]
|
\printbibliography[nottype={online},nottype={patent},heading=subbibliography,resetnumbers=false,segment=\therefsegment]
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% Fix for random mixed date formats, generated with claude.ai
|
||||||
|
% Redefine the date printing macro
|
||||||
|
\renewbibmacro*{date}{%
|
||||||
|
\iffieldundef{year}
|
||||||
|
{}
|
||||||
|
{\printtext{%
|
||||||
|
\thefield{year}%
|
||||||
|
\iffieldundef{month}
|
||||||
|
{}
|
||||||
|
{-\mkdatezeros{\thefield{month}}%
|
||||||
|
\iffieldundef{day}
|
||||||
|
{}
|
||||||
|
{-\mkdatezeros{\thefield{day}}}}%
|
||||||
|
}}%
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% Redefine urldate printing
|
||||||
|
\renewbibmacro*{urldate}{%
|
||||||
|
\iffieldundef{urlyear}
|
||||||
|
{}
|
||||||
|
{\printtext[urldate]{%
|
||||||
|
\thefield{urlyear}%
|
||||||
|
\iffieldundef{urlmonth}
|
||||||
|
{}
|
||||||
|
{-\mkdatezeros{\thefield{urlmonth}}%
|
||||||
|
\iffieldundef{urlday}
|
||||||
|
{}
|
||||||
|
{-\mkdatezeros{\thefield{urlday}}}}%
|
||||||
|
}}%
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
% end fix
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\newrefcontext{defref}
|
\newrefcontext{defref}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\hyphenation{a-me-na-ble}
|
\hyphenation{a-me-na-ble}
|
||||||
\hyphenation{da-ta-cen-ter}
|
\hyphenation{da-ta-cen-ter}
|
||||||
\hyphenation{Si-cher-heits-mo-du-l}
|
\hyphenation{Si-cher-heits-mo-du-l}
|
||||||
\hyphenation{Si-cher-heits-mo-du-le}
|
\hyphenation{Si-cher-heits-mo-du-le}
|
||||||
|
\babelhyphenation[ngerman]{Si-cher-heits-mo-dul}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\setstretch{1.3}
|
\setstretch{1.3}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
BIN
defence/pearson-corr-1.png
Normal file
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 25 KiB |
BIN
defence/pearson-corr-sample-1.png
Normal file
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 24 KiB |
21
defence/pearson-corr-sample.tex
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||||
|
\documentclass[convert={density=500}, border=2pt, varwidth=3in]{standalone}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{amsmath}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{amssymb}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{document}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{align*}
|
||||||
|
r_{X, Y} &= \frac{
|
||||||
|
\sum_{i=1}^n(x_i - \overline{x})(y_i - \overline{y})
|
||||||
|
}{
|
||||||
|
\sqrt{
|
||||||
|
\sum_{i=1}^n(x_i-\overline{x})^2
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
\sqrt{
|
||||||
|
\sum_{i=1}^n(y_i-\overline{y})^2
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
\end{align*}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\end{document}
|
||||||
12
defence/pearson-corr.tex
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||||
|
\documentclass[convert={density=500}, border=2pt, varwidth=2in]{standalone}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{amsmath}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{amssymb}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{document}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{align*}
|
||||||
|
\rho_{X,Y} &= \frac{\mathrm{cov}\left(X, Y\right)}{\sigma_X \sigma_Y}
|
||||||
|
\end{align*}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\end{document}
|
||||||
BIN
defence/phd defence pulse shaping.png
Normal file
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 73 KiB |
957
defence/phd defence pulse shaping.svg
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,957 @@
|
||||||
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
|
||||||
|
<!-- Created with Inkscape (http://www.inkscape.org/) -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<svg
|
||||||
|
width="370mm"
|
||||||
|
height="130mm"
|
||||||
|
viewBox="0 0 370 130"
|
||||||
|
version="1.1"
|
||||||
|
id="svg1"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:version="1.4.3 (0d15f75042, 2025-12-25)"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:docname="phd defence pulse shaping.svg"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:export-filename="phd defence pulse shaping.png"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:export-xdpi="96"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:export-ydpi="96"
|
||||||
|
xmlns:inkscape="http://www.inkscape.org/namespaces/inkscape"
|
||||||
|
xmlns:sodipodi="http://sodipodi.sourceforge.net/DTD/sodipodi-0.dtd"
|
||||||
|
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
|
||||||
|
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
|
||||||
|
xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
|
||||||
|
<sodipodi:namedview
|
||||||
|
id="namedview1"
|
||||||
|
pagecolor="#ffffff"
|
||||||
|
bordercolor="#666666"
|
||||||
|
borderopacity="1.0"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:showpageshadow="2"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:pageopacity="0.0"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:pagecheckerboard="0"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:deskcolor="#d1d1d1"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:document-units="mm"
|
||||||
|
showguides="true"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:zoom="0.76530729"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:cx="755.90551"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:cy="186.19972"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:window-width="1920"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:window-height="1011"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:window-x="0"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:window-y="0"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:window-maximized="1"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:current-layer="layer1">
|
||||||
|
<sodipodi:guide
|
||||||
|
position="248.21932,98.214501"
|
||||||
|
orientation="1,0"
|
||||||
|
id="guide87"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:locked="false" />
|
||||||
|
</sodipodi:namedview>
|
||||||
|
<defs
|
||||||
|
id="defs1">
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="953.65973"
|
||||||
|
y="610.6676"
|
||||||
|
width="100.02054"
|
||||||
|
height="89.777473"
|
||||||
|
id="rect80" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect19" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect21" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="227.89349"
|
||||||
|
height="103.19007"
|
||||||
|
id="rect52" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="208.64201"
|
||||||
|
height="116.03049"
|
||||||
|
id="rect53" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="208.64201"
|
||||||
|
height="116.03049"
|
||||||
|
id="rect60" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="208.64201"
|
||||||
|
height="116.03049"
|
||||||
|
id="rect61" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="953.65973"
|
||||||
|
y="610.6676"
|
||||||
|
width="100.02054"
|
||||||
|
height="89.777473"
|
||||||
|
id="rect81" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="208.64201"
|
||||||
|
height="116.03049"
|
||||||
|
id="rect101" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect19-0" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect121" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect122" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect121-3" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect122-8" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="171.10724"
|
||||||
|
height="119.79226"
|
||||||
|
id="rect127" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect121-1" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect122-9" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="129.1076"
|
||||||
|
height="122.65836"
|
||||||
|
id="rect52-1" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="129.1076"
|
||||||
|
height="122.65836"
|
||||||
|
id="rect150" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="129.1076"
|
||||||
|
height="122.65836"
|
||||||
|
id="rect174" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="237.56361"
|
||||||
|
height="114.82543"
|
||||||
|
id="rect174-6" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect19-7" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect21-6" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="446.81161"
|
||||||
|
height="78.359024"
|
||||||
|
id="rect203" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="237.56361"
|
||||||
|
height="114.82543"
|
||||||
|
id="rect255" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="129.1076"
|
||||||
|
height="122.65836"
|
||||||
|
id="rect52-1-6" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect121-3-4" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect256" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect257" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect258" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect259" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect260" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect262" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect263" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect264" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="208.64201"
|
||||||
|
height="116.03049"
|
||||||
|
id="rect60-2" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="208.64201"
|
||||||
|
height="116.03049"
|
||||||
|
id="rect266" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="208.64201"
|
||||||
|
height="116.03049"
|
||||||
|
id="rect267" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="322.63501"
|
||||||
|
height="112.18803"
|
||||||
|
id="rect271" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="262.04547"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect21-8" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="322.63501"
|
||||||
|
height="112.18803"
|
||||||
|
id="rect271-3" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect121-3-5" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect121-3-5-5" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="262.04547"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect21-8-1" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="206.97021"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect89" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="746.53888"
|
||||||
|
y="302.1705"
|
||||||
|
width="262.04547"
|
||||||
|
height="116.59021"
|
||||||
|
id="rect90" />
|
||||||
|
</defs>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
inkscape:label="Layer 1"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:groupmode="layer"
|
||||||
|
id="layer1"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(-52.874035,-113.01615)">
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#fff6d5;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:3, 3;stroke-dashoffset:0"
|
||||||
|
id="rect268"
|
||||||
|
width="42.333237"
|
||||||
|
height="66.035202"
|
||||||
|
x="342.47104"
|
||||||
|
y="145.78185" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffd5d5;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:3, 3;stroke-dashoffset:0"
|
||||||
|
id="rect18"
|
||||||
|
width="70.229004"
|
||||||
|
height="28.407305"
|
||||||
|
x="-272.7662"
|
||||||
|
y="162.84944"
|
||||||
|
transform="scale(-1,1)" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 251.1584,167.71079 v 19.77278 l 17.12372,-9.88639 -17.12372,-9.88639"
|
||||||
|
id="path10"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 209.28026,167.71079 v 19.77278 l 17.12372,-9.88639 -17.12372,-9.88639"
|
||||||
|
id="path12"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="M 251.1584,174.2632 H 220.62936"
|
||||||
|
id="path13" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="M 251.1584,180.93116 H 220.62936"
|
||||||
|
id="path14" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="M 209.28026,174.2632 H 178.75122"
|
||||||
|
id="path15" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="M 209.28026,180.93116 H 178.75122"
|
||||||
|
id="path16" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="M 311.97135,174.2632 H 262.5075"
|
||||||
|
id="path17"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="M 311.97135,180.93116 H 262.5075"
|
||||||
|
id="path18"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g39"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(-13.828868,-2.4200519)" />
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g270"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(86.653142,-178.07344)">
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.26458333,0,0,0.26458333,51.585057,220.89179)"
|
||||||
|
id="text60"
|
||||||
|
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:26.6667px;line-height:1.25;font-family:'Source Sans Pro';-inkscape-font-specification:'Source Sans Pro';text-align:center;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect60);display:inline"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="779.99356"
|
||||||
|
y="326.43329"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan3">BAT17-04W</tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.26458333,0,0,0.26458333,50.646671,229.58019)"
|
||||||
|
id="text61"
|
||||||
|
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:26.6667px;line-height:1.25;font-family:'Source Sans Pro';-inkscape-font-specification:'Source Sans Pro';text-align:center;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect61);display:inline"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="778.60694"
|
||||||
|
y="326.43329"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan4">RF Schottky</tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g68"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(155.9321,-23.998135)">
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g59"
|
||||||
|
transform="rotate(-135,217.33697,188.46118)">
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0"
|
||||||
|
id="rect54"
|
||||||
|
width="20.126814"
|
||||||
|
height="20.126814"
|
||||||
|
x="202.02536"
|
||||||
|
y="163.96376" />
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="use56"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,2.73499,327.96666)"
|
||||||
|
style="stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 212.74389,161.19528 v 5.53995 l -4.79585,-2.76997 4.79585,-2.76998"
|
||||||
|
id="path90"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 209.09885,165.96187 v 0.85302 h -1.15081 v -2.84963"
|
||||||
|
id="path91"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 206.79721,161.96865 v -0.85302 h 1.15081 v 2.84963"
|
||||||
|
id="use91"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="use57"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,2.735,348.06531)"
|
||||||
|
style="stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 212.74389,161.19528 v 5.53995 l -4.79585,-2.76997 4.79585,-2.76998"
|
||||||
|
id="path92"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 209.09885,165.96187 v 0.85302 h -1.15081 v -2.84963"
|
||||||
|
id="path93"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 206.79721,161.96865 v -0.85302 h 1.15081 v 2.84963"
|
||||||
|
id="use93"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="use58"
|
||||||
|
transform="rotate(90,200.68751,165.3609)"
|
||||||
|
style="stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 212.74389,161.19528 v 5.53995 l -4.79585,-2.76997 4.79585,-2.76998"
|
||||||
|
id="path94"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 209.09885,165.96187 v 0.85302 h -1.15081 v -2.84963"
|
||||||
|
id="path97"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 206.79721,161.96865 v -0.85302 h 1.15081 v 2.84963"
|
||||||
|
id="use97"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="use59"
|
||||||
|
transform="rotate(90,210.75092,175.42431)"
|
||||||
|
style="stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 212.74389,161.19528 v 5.53995 l -4.79585,-2.76997 4.79585,-2.76998"
|
||||||
|
id="path98"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 209.09885,165.96187 v 0.85302 h -1.15081 v -2.84963"
|
||||||
|
id="path99"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 206.79721,161.96865 v -0.85302 h 1.15081 v 2.84963"
|
||||||
|
id="use99"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="use67">
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0"
|
||||||
|
id="rect100"
|
||||||
|
width="2.7993064"
|
||||||
|
height="6.9347825"
|
||||||
|
x="209.44197"
|
||||||
|
y="178.0285" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;opacity:1;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000;stop-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 210.84162,188.1468 v -3.18352"
|
||||||
|
id="path100"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;opacity:1;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000;stop-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 210.84162,178.0285 v -3.18352"
|
||||||
|
id="path101"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<use
|
||||||
|
x="0"
|
||||||
|
y="0"
|
||||||
|
xlink:href="#use67"
|
||||||
|
id="use68"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(1.6482057e-6,41.765435)" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;opacity:1;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000;stop-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 381.00554,178.32411 h 9.08403"
|
||||||
|
id="path76"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;opacity:1;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000;stop-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 338.42306,178.38047 h 14.11886"
|
||||||
|
id="path79"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g117"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0,1,1,0,86.037856,-9.6307419)">
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="use116"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(215.79323,-70.783667)">
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#f9f9f9;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
id="rect102"
|
||||||
|
width="4.5996766"
|
||||||
|
height="1.8177247"
|
||||||
|
x="-34.179646"
|
||||||
|
y="178.76157" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -31.879804,183.76281 v -3.18352"
|
||||||
|
id="path102"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -31.879804,178.76156 v -3.18352"
|
||||||
|
id="path103"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -34.179644,178.76156 h 4.599677"
|
||||||
|
id="path110"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -34.179644,180.57929 h 4.599677"
|
||||||
|
id="path112"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="use117"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(222.46119,-70.859177)">
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#f9f9f9;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
id="rect112"
|
||||||
|
width="4.5996766"
|
||||||
|
height="1.8177247"
|
||||||
|
x="-34.179646"
|
||||||
|
y="178.76157" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -31.879804,183.76281 v -3.18352"
|
||||||
|
id="path113"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -31.879804,178.76156 v -3.18352"
|
||||||
|
id="path114"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -34.179644,178.76156 h 4.599677"
|
||||||
|
id="path115"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -34.179644,180.57929 h 4.599677"
|
||||||
|
id="path116"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;opacity:1;fill:#e3d7f4;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
id="rect119"
|
||||||
|
width="68.967163"
|
||||||
|
height="41.859745"
|
||||||
|
x="64.002045"
|
||||||
|
y="156.69553" />
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.26458333,0,0,0.26458333,5.2759552,144.60139)"
|
||||||
|
id="text20"
|
||||||
|
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:600;font-stretch:normal;font-size:29.3333px;line-height:1.25;font-family:'Inter 24pt';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt Semi-Bold';text-align:center;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect21-8);display:inline"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="774.22896"
|
||||||
|
y="329.32216"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan5">Pulse Amplifier</tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.26458333,0,0,0.26458333,-126.52602,93.775442)"
|
||||||
|
id="text18-2"
|
||||||
|
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:26.6667px;line-height:1.25;font-family:'Inter 24pt';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt';text-align:center;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect19-0);display:inline"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="773.14281"
|
||||||
|
y="326.85384"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan6">STM32G474</tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 167.35324,167.73901 v 19.77279 l 17.12372,-9.8864 -17.12372,-9.88639"
|
||||||
|
id="path120-5"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="M 167.35324,177.62541 H 132.96921"
|
||||||
|
id="path16-0"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.26458333,0,0,0.26458333,-48.680475,116.45311)"
|
||||||
|
id="text121"
|
||||||
|
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:26.6667px;line-height:1.25;font-family:'Inter 24pt';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt';text-align:center;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect121-3);display:inline"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="772.99958"
|
||||||
|
y="326.85384"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan7">74LVC2G157</tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.26458333,0,0,0.26458333,12.7494,69.082544)"
|
||||||
|
id="text121-3"
|
||||||
|
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:26.6667px;line-height:1.25;font-family:'Inter 24pt';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt';text-align:center;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect121-3-5);display:inline"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="772.28343"
|
||||||
|
y="326.85384"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan8">PI3HDX12211</tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.26458333,0,0,0.26458333,-49.475329,125.14987)"
|
||||||
|
id="text122"
|
||||||
|
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:600;font-stretch:normal;font-size:29.3333px;line-height:1.25;font-family:'Inter 24pt';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt Semi-Bold';text-align:center;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect122-8);display:inline"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="757.34809"
|
||||||
|
y="329.32216"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan9">Single-Ended
|
||||||
|
</tspan><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="757.87804"
|
||||||
|
y="365.98879"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan10">to Differential </tspan><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="771.97893"
|
||||||
|
y="402.65542"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan11">Conversion</tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g271"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(-345.1311,41.371294)">
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;opacity:1;fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
id="rect123"
|
||||||
|
width="43.775135"
|
||||||
|
height="27.05452"
|
||||||
|
x="499.15863"
|
||||||
|
y="79.648224" />
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.26458333,0,0,0.26458333,300.87774,-0.17833149)"
|
||||||
|
id="text127"
|
||||||
|
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:26.6667px;line-height:1.25;font-family:'Inter 24pt';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt';text-align:center;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect127);display:inline"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="768.51196"
|
||||||
|
y="326.85384"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan12">Adjustable </tspan><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="786.47423"
|
||||||
|
y="360.18721"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan13">Voltage </tspan><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="774.55364"
|
||||||
|
y="393.52059"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan14">Regulator</tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="use132"
|
||||||
|
transform="rotate(90,157.72608,367.98634)">
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#f9f9f9;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
id="rect116"
|
||||||
|
width="4.5996766"
|
||||||
|
height="1.8177247"
|
||||||
|
x="-34.179646"
|
||||||
|
y="178.76157" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -31.879804,183.76281 v -3.18352"
|
||||||
|
id="path117"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -31.879804,178.76156 v -3.18352"
|
||||||
|
id="path118"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -34.179644,178.76156 h 4.599677"
|
||||||
|
id="path119"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -34.179644,180.57929 h 4.599677"
|
||||||
|
id="path120"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g143"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0,1,1,0,170.92142,-9.6502219)">
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="use142"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(215.79323,-70.783667)">
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#f9f9f9;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
id="rect120"
|
||||||
|
width="4.5996766"
|
||||||
|
height="1.8177247"
|
||||||
|
x="-34.179646"
|
||||||
|
y="178.76157" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -31.879804,183.76281 v -3.18352"
|
||||||
|
id="path121"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -31.879804,178.76156 v -3.18352"
|
||||||
|
id="path122"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -34.179644,178.76156 h 4.599677"
|
||||||
|
id="path123"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -34.179644,180.57929 h 4.599677"
|
||||||
|
id="path124"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="use143"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(222.46119,-70.859177)">
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#f9f9f9;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
id="rect124"
|
||||||
|
width="4.5996766"
|
||||||
|
height="1.8177247"
|
||||||
|
x="-34.179646"
|
||||||
|
y="178.76157" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -31.879804,183.76281 v -3.18352"
|
||||||
|
id="path125"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -31.879804,178.76156 v -3.18352"
|
||||||
|
id="path126"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -34.179644,178.76156 h 4.599677"
|
||||||
|
id="path127"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.7;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m -34.179644,180.57929 h 4.599677"
|
||||||
|
id="path128"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.26458333,0,0,0.26458333,-142.04825,144.60139)"
|
||||||
|
id="text270"
|
||||||
|
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:600;font-stretch:normal;font-size:29.3333px;line-height:1.25;font-family:'Inter 24pt';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt Semi-Bold';text-align:center;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect271);display:inline"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="803.32076"
|
||||||
|
y="329.32216"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan15">Microcontroller</tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
|
||||||
|
d="M 175.9151,172.6822 V 148.07404"
|
||||||
|
id="path73" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
|
||||||
|
d="M 154.02753,134.54678 H 98.485632 v 22.14876"
|
||||||
|
id="path77"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="ccc" />
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.26458333,0,0,0.26458333,103.29647,93.921487)"
|
||||||
|
id="text121-3-4"
|
||||||
|
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:26.6667px;line-height:1.25;font-family:'Inter 24pt';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt';text-align:center;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect121-3-5-5);display:inline"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="819.5426"
|
||||||
|
y="326.85384"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan16">Input</tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g87"
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(10.878009,7.7533681)">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
id="path104"
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m 284.21784,205.97009 c -1e-5,0.70399 1.16966,1.27468 2.61252,1.27468 1.44285,0 2.61252,-0.57069 2.61251,-1.27468"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="csc" />
|
||||||
|
<ellipse
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
id="ellipse104"
|
||||||
|
cx="-286.83035"
|
||||||
|
cy="179.00661"
|
||||||
|
rx="2.6125116"
|
||||||
|
ry="1.274675"
|
||||||
|
transform="scale(-1,1)" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 289.44287,179.00661 v 26.96348"
|
||||||
|
id="path105"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 284.21784,179.00661 v 26.96348"
|
||||||
|
id="path106"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 286.83035,207.24477 v 4.57746"
|
||||||
|
id="path107" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="M 284.21784,205.97009 H 279.4833"
|
||||||
|
id="path108"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 286.83035,178.98444 v -5.79542"
|
||||||
|
id="path109"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 281.60398,211.82223 h -4.24137"
|
||||||
|
id="path78"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 288.95104,211.82223 h -4.24137"
|
||||||
|
id="path111"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
|
||||||
|
d="m 279.48329,205.97009 v 5.85214"
|
||||||
|
id="path87" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g87-2"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,10.877997,347.45222)">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
id="path104-2"
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
d="m 284.21784,205.97009 c -1e-5,0.70399 1.16966,1.27468 2.61252,1.27468 1.44285,0 2.61252,-0.57069 2.61251,-1.27468"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="csc" />
|
||||||
|
<ellipse
|
||||||
|
style="font-variation-settings:normal;vector-effect:none;fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-dashoffset:0;stroke-opacity:1;-inkscape-stroke:none;stop-color:#000000"
|
||||||
|
id="ellipse104-6"
|
||||||
|
cx="-286.83035"
|
||||||
|
cy="179.00661"
|
||||||
|
rx="2.6125116"
|
||||||
|
ry="1.274675"
|
||||||
|
transform="scale(-1,1)" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 289.44287,179.00661 v 26.96348"
|
||||||
|
id="path105-1"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 284.21784,179.00661 v 26.96348"
|
||||||
|
id="path106-0"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 286.83035,207.24477 v 4.57746"
|
||||||
|
id="path107-6" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="M 284.21784,205.97009 H 279.4833"
|
||||||
|
id="path108-1"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 286.83035,178.98444 v -5.79542"
|
||||||
|
id="path109-5"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 281.60398,211.82223 h -4.24137"
|
||||||
|
id="path78-9"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none;stroke-opacity:1"
|
||||||
|
d="m 288.95104,211.82223 h -4.24137"
|
||||||
|
id="path111-4"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
|
||||||
|
d="m 279.48329,205.97009 v 5.85214"
|
||||||
|
id="path87-9" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.26458333,0,0,0.26458333,61.195785,144.60139)"
|
||||||
|
id="text20-1"
|
||||||
|
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:600;font-stretch:normal;font-size:29.3333px;line-height:1.25;font-family:'Inter 24pt';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt Semi-Bold';text-align:center;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect21-8-1);display:inline"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="818.55834"
|
||||||
|
y="329.32216"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan17">Clip Line</tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
|
||||||
|
d="m 366.7737,150.84685 h -54.80235 v 0 23.41635"
|
||||||
|
id="path88" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round"
|
||||||
|
d="M 366.77373,205.9141 H 311.97135 V 180.93116"
|
||||||
|
id="path89"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="ccc" />
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.26458333,0,0,0.26458333,177.7178,93.921487)"
|
||||||
|
id="text89"
|
||||||
|
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:26.6667px;line-height:1.25;font-family:'Inter 24pt';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt';text-align:center;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect89);display:inline"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="808.53348"
|
||||||
|
y="326.85384"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan18">Output</tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.26458333,0,0,0.26458333,130.52701,144.60139)"
|
||||||
|
id="text90"
|
||||||
|
style="font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:600;font-stretch:normal;font-size:29.3333px;line-height:1.25;font-family:'Inter 24pt';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt Semi-Bold';text-align:center;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect90);display:inline"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="777.58052"
|
||||||
|
y="329.32216"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan19">Sampling Gate</tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
</svg>
|
||||||
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 42 KiB |
1508
defence/phd defence slide drafts.svg
Normal file
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 42 MiB |
BIN
defence/phd defence tdr principle.png
Normal file
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 57 KiB |
376
defence/phd defence tdr principle.svg
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,376 @@
|
||||||
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
|
||||||
|
<!-- Created with Inkscape (http://www.inkscape.org/) -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<svg
|
||||||
|
width="100mm"
|
||||||
|
height="60mm"
|
||||||
|
viewBox="0 0 100 60"
|
||||||
|
version="1.1"
|
||||||
|
id="svg1"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:version="1.4.3 (0d15f75042, 2025-12-25)"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:docname="phd defence tdr principle.svg"
|
||||||
|
xmlns:inkscape="http://www.inkscape.org/namespaces/inkscape"
|
||||||
|
xmlns:sodipodi="http://sodipodi.sourceforge.net/DTD/sodipodi-0.dtd"
|
||||||
|
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
|
||||||
|
xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
|
||||||
|
<sodipodi:namedview
|
||||||
|
id="namedview1"
|
||||||
|
pagecolor="#ffffff"
|
||||||
|
bordercolor="#000000"
|
||||||
|
borderopacity="0.25"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:showpageshadow="2"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:pageopacity="0.0"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:pagecheckerboard="0"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:deskcolor="#d1d1d1"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:document-units="mm"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:zoom="1.6739708"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:cx="150.83896"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:cy="138.29393"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:window-width="1920"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:window-height="1011"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:window-x="0"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:window-y="0"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:window-maximized="1"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:current-layer="layer1" />
|
||||||
|
<defs
|
||||||
|
id="defs1">
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="551.65271"
|
||||||
|
y="309.45667"
|
||||||
|
width="62.353214"
|
||||||
|
height="50.517651"
|
||||||
|
id="rect11" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="551.65271"
|
||||||
|
y="309.45667"
|
||||||
|
width="62.353214"
|
||||||
|
height="50.517651"
|
||||||
|
id="rect12" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="551.65271"
|
||||||
|
y="309.45667"
|
||||||
|
width="62.353214"
|
||||||
|
height="50.517651"
|
||||||
|
id="rect11-0" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="551.65271"
|
||||||
|
y="309.45667"
|
||||||
|
width="62.353214"
|
||||||
|
height="50.517651"
|
||||||
|
id="rect11-0-9" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="551.65271"
|
||||||
|
y="309.45667"
|
||||||
|
width="62.353214"
|
||||||
|
height="50.517651"
|
||||||
|
id="rect11-0-0" />
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
x="551.65271"
|
||||||
|
y="309.45667"
|
||||||
|
width="62.353214"
|
||||||
|
height="50.517651"
|
||||||
|
id="rect25" />
|
||||||
|
</defs>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
inkscape:label="Layer 1"
|
||||||
|
inkscape:groupmode="layer"
|
||||||
|
id="layer1"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(-63.811274,-50.604338)">
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g3"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.24012329,0,0,0.23457606,81.922797,65.216881)"
|
||||||
|
style="stroke-width:2.10674;stroke-dasharray:none">
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:2.10674;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
id="rect1"
|
||||||
|
width="52.476543"
|
||||||
|
height="40.305092"
|
||||||
|
x="74.212349"
|
||||||
|
y="54.643913" />
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g2"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(-3.7859123,-1.9406318)"
|
||||||
|
style="stroke-width:2.10674;stroke-dasharray:none">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:2.10674;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="M 123.31803,65.720385 85.155036,87.753797"
|
||||||
|
id="path1" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:2.10674;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="M 123.31803,87.753797 85.155036,65.720385"
|
||||||
|
id="path2" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g4"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(31.446729,-5.2641985)">
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
id="rect1-3"
|
||||||
|
width="12.600841"
|
||||||
|
height="9.4546099"
|
||||||
|
x="42.850857"
|
||||||
|
y="71.155426" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 44.314411,78.24975 h 3.904353 v -5.010587 h 4.229716 v 5.010587 h 2.082322"
|
||||||
|
id="path3"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccccc" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<circle
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
id="path4"
|
||||||
|
cx="80.598007"
|
||||||
|
cy="91.641884"
|
||||||
|
r="6.5220127" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 112.40881,80.178084 h 9.96623"
|
||||||
|
id="path5"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 122.37504,80.178084 v -4.030459 h 3.4442 v 4.030459 h 3.44421"
|
||||||
|
id="path6"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="ccccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 129.26345,80.178084 v -4.030459 h 3.4442 v 4.030459 h 3.44421"
|
||||||
|
id="path7"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="ccccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 136.15186,80.178084 v -4.030459 h 3.4442 v 4.030459 h 3.44421"
|
||||||
|
id="path8"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="ccccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 143.04027,80.178084 v -4.030459 h 3.4442 v 4.030459 h 3.44421"
|
||||||
|
id="path9"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="ccccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.3;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 118.71556,72.618668 h 1.69044 c 0.8343,-0.02487 0.96416,-3.389326 1.59899,-3.225756 0.48905,0.126012 -0.0471,3.225756 0.82615,3.225756 h 1.84447"
|
||||||
|
id="path11"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="ccscc" />
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g12"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(1.1890548,0,0,1.1890548,-20.775141,-10.295906)"
|
||||||
|
style="stroke-width:0.841004">
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="scale(0.26458333)"
|
||||||
|
id="text11"
|
||||||
|
style="font-size:10.6667px;line-height:10.5322px;font-family:Lemon;-inkscape-font-specification:Lemon;text-decoration-color:#000000;writing-mode:lr-tb;direction:ltr;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect11);display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:1.5893;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="551.65234"
|
||||||
|
y="317.93003"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan6"><tspan
|
||||||
|
style="font-family:'Inter 24pt SemiBold';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt SemiBold, ';fill:#000000;stroke:none"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan5">Z</tspan></tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.16085311,0,0,0.16085311,59.294945,33.617914)"
|
||||||
|
id="text12"
|
||||||
|
style="font-size:10.6667px;line-height:10.5322px;font-family:Lemon;-inkscape-font-specification:Lemon;text-decoration-color:#000000;writing-mode:lr-tb;direction:ltr;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect12);display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:2.61419;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="551.65234"
|
||||||
|
y="317.93003"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan8"><tspan
|
||||||
|
style="font-family:'Inter 24pt SemiBold';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt SemiBold, ';fill:#000000;stroke:none"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan7">term</tspan></tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 149.92868,80.178084 v 4.324963"
|
||||||
|
id="path12" />
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g16"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(9.0092604,4.3073374)">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 140.91941,88.369128 v 4.324963"
|
||||||
|
id="path13" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 142.94854,92.694091 h -4.05827"
|
||||||
|
id="path14"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 142.17512,93.79642 h -2.51145"
|
||||||
|
id="path15"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 141.45505,94.86319 h -1.0713"
|
||||||
|
id="path16"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cc" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<rect
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
id="rect16"
|
||||||
|
width="3.2248845"
|
||||||
|
height="8.1734142"
|
||||||
|
x="148.31622"
|
||||||
|
y="84.503052" />
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.31460408,0,0,0.31460408,-38.393695,-27.642884)"
|
||||||
|
id="text11-6"
|
||||||
|
style="font-size:10.6667px;line-height:10.5322px;font-family:Lemon;-inkscape-font-specification:Lemon;text-decoration-color:#000000;writing-mode:lr-tb;direction:ltr;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect11-0);display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:1.5893;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="551.65234"
|
||||||
|
y="317.93003"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan10"><tspan
|
||||||
|
style="font-family:'Inter 24pt SemiBold';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt SemiBold, ';fill:#000000;stroke:none"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan9">Mesh</tspan></tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g18"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.54818411,0,0,0.52713488,61.970729,38.534926)"
|
||||||
|
style="stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-dasharray:none">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 113.89313,61.654747 h 4.62411 l -2.04582,0.616548 0.5605,-0.616548"
|
||||||
|
id="path17" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 113.89313,61.654747 h 4.62411 l -2.04582,-0.616548 0.5605,0.616548"
|
||||||
|
id="path18" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.3;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 145.10975,83.740846 h -1.69044 c -0.8343,0.0249 -0.96416,3.38932 -1.59899,3.22575 -0.48905,-0.12601 0.0471,-3.22575 -0.82615,-3.22575 h -1.84447"
|
||||||
|
id="path19"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="ccscc" />
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g21"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(-0.54818411,0,0,-0.52713488,201.85459,117.82459)"
|
||||||
|
style="stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-dasharray:none">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 113.89313,61.654747 h 4.62411 l -2.04582,0.616548 0.5605,-0.616548"
|
||||||
|
id="path20" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 113.89313,61.654747 h 4.62411 l -2.04582,-0.616548 0.5605,0.616548"
|
||||||
|
id="path21" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g18-1"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.54818411,0,0,0.52713488,32.981996,45.838032)"
|
||||||
|
style="stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-dasharray:none">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 113.89313,61.654747 h 4.62411 l -2.04582,0.616548 0.5605,-0.616548"
|
||||||
|
id="path17-8" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 113.89313,61.654747 h 4.62411 l -2.04582,-0.616548 0.5605,0.616548"
|
||||||
|
id="path18-7" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g18-3"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(-0.54818411,0,0,0.52713488,160.38558,54.563203)"
|
||||||
|
style="stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-dasharray:none">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 113.89313,61.654747 h 4.62411 l -2.04582,0.616548 0.5605,-0.616548"
|
||||||
|
id="path17-7" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 113.89313,61.654747 h 4.62411 l -2.04582,-0.616548 0.5605,0.616548"
|
||||||
|
id="path18-5" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 86.898427,70.618534 h 4.170574 v 9.558567 h 8.673909"
|
||||||
|
id="path22"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="cccc" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 99.74291,85.428682 h -8.780343 v 6.400233 h -3.845234"
|
||||||
|
id="path23" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.499999;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 74.315839,91.552506 c 1.162887,-0.268434 1.677432,3.187804 2.134029,3.292669 0.844521,0.193958 1.315889,-6.385784 2.13403,-6.385784 1.183523,0 1.021225,6.385784 2.134029,6.385784 0.759208,0 1.363034,-6.385784 2.134029,-6.385784 1.018512,0 1.296598,6.890369 2.13403,6.385784 0.468664,-0.282388 0.82304,-4.114815 2.134029,-3.292669"
|
||||||
|
id="path24"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="csssssc" />
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="layer1-7"
|
||||||
|
transform="translate(-25.02147,9.3303218)">
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.31460408,0,0,0.31460408,-48.737596,-33.80712)"
|
||||||
|
id="text11-6-8"
|
||||||
|
style="font-size:10.6667px;line-height:10.5322px;font-family:Lemon;-inkscape-font-specification:Lemon;text-decoration-color:#000000;writing-mode:lr-tb;direction:ltr;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect11-0-9);display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:1.5893;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="551.65234"
|
||||||
|
y="317.93003"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan12"><tspan
|
||||||
|
style="font-family:'Inter 24pt SemiBold';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt SemiBold, ';fill:#000000;stroke:none"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan11">Coupler</tspan></tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.31460408,0,0,0.31460408,-102.80337,-40.812044)"
|
||||||
|
id="text11-6-1"
|
||||||
|
style="font-size:10.6667px;line-height:10.5322px;font-family:Lemon;-inkscape-font-specification:Lemon;text-align:center;text-decoration-color:#000000;writing-mode:lr-tb;direction:ltr;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect11-0-0);display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:1.5893;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
x="31.176607"
|
||||||
|
y="0"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="569.15198"
|
||||||
|
y="317.93003"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan14"><tspan
|
||||||
|
style="font-family:'Inter 24pt SemiBold';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt SemiBold, ';fill:#000000;stroke:none"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan13">Pulse </tspan></tspan><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="557.78996"
|
||||||
|
y="328.67985"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan16"><tspan
|
||||||
|
style="font-family:'Inter 24pt SemiBold';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt SemiBold, ';fill:#000000;stroke:none"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan15">Generator</tspan></tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<text
|
||||||
|
xml:space="preserve"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.31460408,0,0,0.31460408,-102.80337,3.0114252)"
|
||||||
|
id="text25"
|
||||||
|
style="font-size:10.6667px;line-height:10.5322px;font-family:Lemon;-inkscape-font-specification:Lemon;text-align:center;text-decoration-color:#000000;writing-mode:lr-tb;direction:ltr;white-space:pre;shape-inside:url(#rect25);display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:1.5893;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
x="31.176607"
|
||||||
|
y="0"><tspan
|
||||||
|
x="562.15716"
|
||||||
|
y="317.93003"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan18"><tspan
|
||||||
|
style="font-family:'Inter 24pt SemiBold';-inkscape-font-specification:'Inter 24pt SemiBold, ';fill:#000000;stroke:none"
|
||||||
|
id="tspan17">Sampler</tspan></tspan></text>
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.3;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 89.5926,68.72123 h 1.69044 c 0.8343,-0.02487 0.96416,-3.389326 1.59899,-3.225756 0.48905,0.126012 -0.0471,3.225756 0.82615,3.225756 h 1.84447"
|
||||||
|
id="path11-1"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="ccscc" />
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g18-5"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(0.54818411,0,0,0.52713488,32.847772,34.637488)"
|
||||||
|
style="stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-dasharray:none">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 113.89313,61.654747 h 4.62411 l -2.04582,0.616548 0.5605,-0.616548"
|
||||||
|
id="path17-5" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 113.89313,61.654747 h 4.62411 l -2.04582,-0.616548 0.5605,0.616548"
|
||||||
|
id="path18-4" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:none;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.3;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 95.74733,94.005475 h -1.69044 c -0.8343,0.02487 -0.96416,3.389326 -1.59899,3.225756 -0.48905,-0.126012 0.0471,-3.225756 -0.82615,-3.225756 h -1.84447"
|
||||||
|
id="path25"
|
||||||
|
sodipodi:nodetypes="ccscc" />
|
||||||
|
<g
|
||||||
|
id="g27"
|
||||||
|
transform="matrix(-0.54818411,0,0,-0.52713488,152.49216,128.08922)"
|
||||||
|
style="stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-dasharray:none">
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 113.89313,61.654747 h 4.62411 l -2.04582,0.616548 0.5605,-0.616548"
|
||||||
|
id="path26" />
|
||||||
|
<path
|
||||||
|
style="fill:#ffffff;fill-opacity:1;stroke:#1a1612;stroke-width:0.558081;stroke-linecap:round;stroke-linejoin:round;stroke-dasharray:none"
|
||||||
|
d="m 113.89313,61.654747 h 4.62411 l -2.04582,-0.616548 0.5605,0.616548"
|
||||||
|
id="path27" />
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
</g>
|
||||||
|
</svg>
|
||||||
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 18 KiB |
BIN
defence/slides.odp
Normal file
BIN
defence/slides.pdf
Normal file
|
|
@ -1,74 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
\chapter*{A Note on Hardware Security Module Terminology}
|
|
||||||
\adjustmtc
|
|
||||||
\addcontentsline{toc}{chapter}{A Note on Hardware Security Module Terminology}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this thesis, we use the term \emph{Hardware Security Module (HSM)} to refer to a security device that has the
|
|
||||||
following three properties.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
||||||
\item A HSM targets the prevention of any conceivable physical attack. In particular, this includes intrusion attempts
|
|
||||||
such as careful drilling or cutting into the device from any direction.
|
|
||||||
\item A HSM includes tamper sensors that when triggered result in an active tamper response, usually deleting all
|
|
||||||
cryptographic secrets and rendering the device inoperable.
|
|
||||||
\item A HSM's tamper sensing and response subsystem is continuously powered from a backup power supply, usually a
|
|
||||||
battery. Loss of power triggers the tamper response.
|
|
||||||
\end{enumerate}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This use of the term \emph{HSM} aligns with common usage of the term both in the academic literature and in everyday
|
|
||||||
conversation. Particularly the requirement of active tamper detection and response is crucial to distinguish a HSM from
|
|
||||||
simpler devices such as TPMs, smart cards or secure enclaves in SoCs. Note that our use of the term HSM is slightly
|
|
||||||
different from its use in government standards, from its use in the PCI SSC (Payment Card Industry Security Standards
|
|
||||||
Council) standards, and from its industry use.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In industry, the term HSM is often used for solutions that are only logically segregated and that do not include any
|
|
||||||
particular defense against hardware attacks. Our conjecture is that this is a consequence of the standardization
|
|
||||||
landscape, where for applications outside of card payment processing the US FIPS
|
|
||||||
140-22~\cite{usnationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnologySecurityRequirementsCryptographic2002} standard was central to
|
|
||||||
the industry. Despite encompassing both devices that include active tamper detection and response, FIPS 140-2 did not
|
|
||||||
draw a distinction in its terminology between the two classes.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Use in government standards}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Under US national standard FIPS 140 in in its 2002 version
|
|
||||||
2~\cite{usnationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnologySecurityRequirementsCryptographic2002}, a HSM would be called a
|
|
||||||
\emph{Multiple-Chip Cryptographic Module} that conforms to the standard's \emph{Security Level 4}. Interesting to note
|
|
||||||
are that only security level 4 requires any active tamper detection and response, so its security levels 3 and below do
|
|
||||||
not align with our HSM definition. Futher of note is that according to the standard, a single-chip solution does not
|
|
||||||
require any tamper detection and response either to meet the standard's security level 4, which is in misalignment with
|
|
||||||
our definition. The standard's 2019 updated version FIPS
|
|
||||||
140-3~\cite{usnationalinstituteofstandardsandtechnologySecurityRequirementsCryptographic2019} defers to the
|
|
||||||
international standards ISO/IEC 19790 and 24759.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ISO/IEC 19790~\cite{ISOIEC19790} and ISO/IEC 24759~\cite{ISOIEC24759} call what we call a HSM a \emph{Hardware
|
|
||||||
Cryptographic Module} corresponding with the standards \emph{Security Level 4}. However, these standards only require
|
|
||||||
active tamper detection and response when cryptographic secrets are transmitted in plaintext between chips.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Use in card payment processing (PCI SSC) standards}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) is an association of credit card network operators that
|
|
||||||
defines standards for all layers of card payment processing, from card payment terminals in stores to the handling of
|
|
||||||
payment data in online shop backend systems.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
PCI SSC terminology aligns with our use and with common everyday use of the term HSM. In PCI SSC terminology, a HSM is a
|
|
||||||
crytographic device that has active tamper detecion and response circuitry. However, PCI SSC terminology differs from
|
|
||||||
our use of the term HSM in one nuance: In PCI SSC terminology, a HSM is specifically a datacenter device used for
|
|
||||||
backend processing of payment data. The general class of ``hardware devices performing some security function with or
|
|
||||||
without particular physical security requirements'' that ISO/IEC 19790 and other standards call a \emph{Hardware
|
|
||||||
Cryptographic Module}, in PCI SSC terminology is termed \emph{Secure Cryptographic Device (SCD)} in more recent standard
|
|
||||||
versions, which was updated from the previous term \emph{Tamper-Resistant Security Module (TRSM)}. Other than HSMs, PCI
|
|
||||||
SSC includes smartcards and card payment terminals in this category. Card payment terminals, referred to as
|
|
||||||
\emph{Pin-Entry Device (PED)} in PCI SSC standards, have to include a surprising amount of active tamper detection and
|
|
||||||
response functionality including partial coverage of areas like they system's main cryptographic processor and smart
|
|
||||||
card reader by battery-backed tamper-sensing meshes.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section*{Tamper-Sensing Meshes}
|
|
||||||
\addcontentsline{toc}{subsection}{Tamper-Sensing Meshes}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this thesis, we use the terms \emph{Tamper-Sensing Mesh} and \emph{Security Mesh} synonymous. We use both terms to
|
|
||||||
refer to any electrical circuit whose path is laid out to cover a surface with the intent of detecting attempts at
|
|
||||||
drilling, cutting or otherwise manipulating this surface. While the term \emph{Security Mesh} is more concise, it is
|
|
||||||
less clear to people unfamiliar with the matter. It is also polysemous, and depending on context can also refer to woven
|
|
||||||
or stamped metal meshes used as fences or as screens in front of windows to prevent break-ins. As a result, it is harder
|
|
||||||
to use in online searches, and when using Large Language Models (LLMs), it frequently leads to amusing hallucinations.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
557
main.bib
17
thesis.tex
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
|
||||||
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper,notitlepage,twoside]{book}
|
\ifdefined\thesisoneside %
|
||||||
\usepackage[a4paper, top=3cm, bottom=3.5cm, inner=3.5cm, outer=5cm, marginpar=3.8cm]{geometry}
|
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper,notitlepage,oneside]{book}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage[a4paper, top=3cm, bottom=3.5cm, inner=3.5cm, outer=5cm, marginpar=3.5cm]{geometry}
|
||||||
|
\else %
|
||||||
|
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper,notitlepage,twoside]{book}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage[a4paper, top=3cm, bottom=3.5cm, inner=3.5cm, outer=5cm, marginpar=3.5cm]{geometry}
|
||||||
|
\fi %
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\input{common-packages}
|
\input{common-packages}
|
||||||
\input{common-defs}
|
\input{common-defs}
|
||||||
|
|
@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
|
||||||
\newcommand{\chaptertitle}[1]{
|
\newcommand{\chaptertitle}[1]{
|
||||||
\chapter{#1}
|
\chapter{#1}
|
||||||
\printchapterquote
|
\printchapterquote
|
||||||
|
%FIXME note leo: remove minitocs?
|
||||||
\begin{spacing}{1.1}
|
\begin{spacing}{1.1}
|
||||||
\minitoc
|
\minitoc
|
||||||
\end{spacing}
|
\end{spacing}
|
||||||
|
|
@ -27,15 +33,16 @@
|
||||||
\input{titlepage.tex}
|
\input{titlepage.tex}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\frontmatter
|
\frontmatter
|
||||||
|
%\chapter*{Akademischer Werdegang}
|
||||||
|
%\includepdf[pages=-]{lebenslauf-en-akademischer-werdegang-diss.pdf}
|
||||||
\input{abstract-de.tex}
|
\input{abstract-de.tex}
|
||||||
\input{abstract.tex}
|
\input{abstract.tex}
|
||||||
\input{ai-llm-use-disclosure.tex}
|
\input{ai-llm-use-disclosure.tex}
|
||||||
\input{hsm-terminology-notes.tex}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\clearpage
|
\clearpage
|
||||||
\tableofcontents
|
\tableofcontents
|
||||||
\listoffigures
|
%\listoffigures
|
||||||
\listoftables
|
%\listoftables
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\mainmatter
|
\mainmatter
|
||||||
\dochapter{chapter-introduction} % Status: In pretty good shape
|
\dochapter{chapter-introduction} % Status: In pretty good shape
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -55,10 +55,16 @@
|
||||||
Darmstadt, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 2025
|
Darmstadt, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 2025
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\noindent
|
\noindent
|
||||||
URN: TBD FIXME
|
URN: https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuda-150469
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\noindent
|
\noindent
|
||||||
Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: TBD FIXME
|
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26083/tuda-7720
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\noindent
|
||||||
|
Document revision: \input{version}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\noindent
|
||||||
|
Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: TBD
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\noindent
|
\noindent
|
||||||
Veröffentlicht unter CC-BY-SA 4.0 International
|
Veröffentlicht unter CC-BY-SA 4.0 International
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||