QKD WIP
This commit is contained in:
parent
dcf54bd0f5
commit
5c0b61671b
3 changed files with 1682 additions and 28 deletions
Binary file not shown.
|
|
@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ key storage, network communication and computation costs.
|
|||
\todo{research some more policies.}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{The Physics of Quantum Computing}
|
||||
\todo{missing}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Quantum Key Distribution}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -317,7 +318,7 @@ xWDM.}
|
|||
\todo{CV-QKD}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Relaying}
|
||||
% FIXME (one?) term of the art seems to be "repeater"
|
||||
\todo{(one?) term of the art seems to be "repeater"}
|
||||
|
||||
The No-Cloning Theorem prevents us from using conventional optical amplifiers to extend the range of a single continuous
|
||||
QKD link. What remains as ways to extend the range of a QKD link are \emph{relaying} methods, where one QKD link is
|
||||
|
|
@ -349,7 +350,7 @@ QKD services over complex network topologies.
|
|||
|
||||
There exists a large corpus of academic research on the theory of such large-scale QKD networks ranging from the
|
||||
technical implementation of management protocols to specialized QKD systems for QKD networks that improve on standard
|
||||
two-party QKD in areas such as complexity or performance. % FIXME lots of citations here
|
||||
two-party QKD in areas such as complexity or performance. \todo{lots of citations here}
|
||||
In the past decades, a number of proof-of-concept QKD networks have been put into practice. None of these systems
|
||||
provide any practical utility yet, and their raison d'être lies in the political realm more than it arises out of
|
||||
technical necessity considering that any of today's city-scale demonstrations can easily be simulated more compactly in
|
||||
|
|
@ -388,13 +389,77 @@ The second prediction we can make is that any practical QKD network will have to
|
|||
distances. While in certain specialized applications such as the proposed financial QKD network in Switzerland
|
||||
\todo{citation on swiss deployment} smaller, isolated networks are conceivable, in every telecommunication system from
|
||||
the telegraph through the telephone system and up to the internet it has been shown conclusively that there is a real
|
||||
demand for a unified, global interconnected network. \todo{citation on historic networks}
|
||||
demand for a global, interconnected network\footnote{In fact, history repeats, and the enthusiasm that Quantum Key
|
||||
Distribution networks have kindled parallels the one that the first trans-atlantic telegraph cables brought forth as
|
||||
described by \textcite{mullerWiringWorldSocial2016}. Both parallel not just in the extensive promises attributed to
|
||||
their respective technologies, but also in the facade of technological determinism that in both cases hides a number of
|
||||
social and political motivations.}\cite{mullerWiringWorldSocial2016}. \todo{at least one more citation on historic
|
||||
networks}
|
||||
|
||||
In this section, we will outline a solution that provides practical, end-to-end security in large-scale QKD networks by
|
||||
delegating the hardware trust issue of QKD relays to Inertial Hardware Security Modules. The primary design challenges
|
||||
we will address are the systems' overall envelope design, optical passthroughs, and matching the cryptographic
|
||||
assumptions behind the IHSM's heartbeat and alarm subsystem to those of the QKD application.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{The anatomy of a QKD node}
|
||||
|
||||
With the exception of special cases such as the middle node in a MDI-QKD system, a general QKD relay contains the same
|
||||
components that the endpoint of a QKD connection uses. Only in a QKD relay, two transceivers are connected back-to-back
|
||||
to one another. QKD provides physical security for the photons traversing the fiber that forms the systme's channel, and
|
||||
the security envelope of the system begins where this fiber is terminated in the power splitters, single-photon
|
||||
deetctors, lasers, and interferometers of the QKD transmitter and receiver. To process the raw measurements of the QKD
|
||||
system into a usable stream of secret key bits, in addition to these components implementing the physics of the QKD
|
||||
system, a classical computer is needed. On top of the remote monitoring and management tasks that any piece of
|
||||
networking equipment is expected to perform nowadays, this computer is tasked with the information reconciliation and
|
||||
privacy amplification that form the information-theoretic part of the QKD system. Since this computer necesesarily
|
||||
handles secret key bits in their plain text form, it, too, must be inside the relay node's physical protection envelope.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Physical requirements of QKD transceivers}
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Physical dimensions.}
|
||||
At this point, a number of commercial systems promising QKD exist. Common QKD protocols do not require any particularly
|
||||
large or power-hungry components, and so commercial systems have generally adopted the 19 Inch rackmount enclosure
|
||||
standard that is common to modern telecommunications equipment, with a width of $\approx\qty{50}{\centi\meter}$, a
|
||||
height between $\approx\qtyrange{4}{30}{\centi\meter}$ and a depth below $\approx\qty{100}{\centi\meter}$.\todo{Re-check
|
||||
these shortly before submission}. While something of this size would be infeasible to protect with the security mesh of
|
||||
a traditional hardware security module, placed vertically, even without modifications any of these systems are well
|
||||
within an envelope that can be protected with a single IHSM cage.
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Power supply.}
|
||||
QKD systems do not contain any particularly power-hungry components. Unlike quantum computers, most of the signal path
|
||||
is optical, and as such can be implemented with room-temperature fiber-optic components. Only the single-photon
|
||||
detectors may require cooling in some systems, but unlike something like an ion trap quantum computer's processor,
|
||||
energy-intensive deep cryogenic cooling is not necessary. Most manufacturers don't quote the power requirements of their
|
||||
systems, but we were able to find that IDQuantique specifies their QKD systems to be able to run off a single
|
||||
\qty{300}{\watt} power supply. In an intertial HSM, power up to several \unit{\kilo\watt} can easily be transferred to
|
||||
the payload with through-axis cables.
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Cooling.}
|
||||
While the few hundred watt of power that QKD systems require could easily be transported through the mesh of a a
|
||||
traditional HSM as well, cooling that amount of thermal load purely by heat conduction through centimeters of epoxy
|
||||
resin would make implementation infeasible in traditional HSM. In an IHSM, on the other hand, up to several
|
||||
\unit{\kilo\watt} can easily be dissipated through forced-air cooling since the rotating security mesh can have an
|
||||
arbitrary amount of longitudinal slots or holes.
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Data and signals.}
|
||||
A QKD transceiver has a number of ports in addition the port for the fiber optic quantum channel. Depending on the
|
||||
system, one or more additional optical links may be necessary for clock distribution, allowing both endpoints to tune
|
||||
their lasers into precise alignment. QKD protocols require a classical link used for information reconciliation, which
|
||||
along with the key stream output and management links requires one or more classical network ports.
|
||||
|
||||
In a QKD relay node, the key stream never leaves the security envelope. The management and information reconciliation
|
||||
links can be combined into a single, classical network link, requiring a single fiber when using a standard wavelength
|
||||
division multiplexing transceiver. The QKD link's clock channel and the quantum channel require a dedicated fiber each,
|
||||
adding up to a total of five fibers for a uni-directional QKD relay, or nine fibers for a bidirectional one. Since fiber
|
||||
pigtails have an outer diameter of usually about \qty{1}{\milli\meter}, this amount of fibers can easily be fed through
|
||||
an IHSM's axis of rotation. The mechanical challenge in such a multi-fiber signal and data feedthrough is to observe the
|
||||
fiber's minimum bending radius, which for common fibers is usually in the range of
|
||||
\qtyrange{5}{10}{\milli\meter}\todo{Provide citation on bend radius. Maybe a small table of products by a few vendors?}.
|
||||
For detailed passthrough designs, we refer the reader to Chapter FIXME of this thesis.\todo{Actually write the chapter,
|
||||
then cross-link here.}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Outlook}
|
||||
|
||||
\newpage
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue