Add introduction notes

chapter-introduction/chapter.tex

@@ -6,4 +6,73 @@
 }
 \chaptertitle{Introduction}
 
-\section{Test}
+\section{Centralized Authority}
+% ACAB is a anti-authoritarian sentiment
+% In anarchist discourse, "cops" are not just policemen and -women, but also other means of centralized control.
+% Anarchism rejects centralized authority in favor of the freedom of individuals because it recognizes the dangers
+% inherent in centralized authority 
+
+% While anarchism is one extreme of the spectrum, the dangers of centralized control are well-established.
+% The constitutions of all modern democracies recognize these dangers, and contain elaborate provisions such as a
+% separation of powers, and extensive protections for civil society and journalism
+% While modern democratic policy rejects anarchism, it embraces it's criticism of power in some vital niches.
+% Examples: Whistleblower protection, attorney-client privilege, doctor-patient confidentiality and protections on state
+% agents such as judges or politicians
+
+% Centralized authority promises efficiency, but it has a tendency to go awry.
+% These sanctuaries carved out from the state's authority in democracies are vital to the functioning of the system
+% In today's computing environment, we observe some parallels to this limitation of centralized authority
+% In classical computing, centralized control was used abundantly to create order
+% Like absolute political authority becomes dangerous when subverted, centralized control in computing becomes dangerous
+% when systems are compromised through hacking.
+% Allocating control can be done using cryptography
+% Cryptography provides near-perfect mathematical solutions to almost any control problem
+% However, as anyone who has taken an introductory crypto course knows, encrypting things isn't the hard part. The hard
+% part is managing keys.
+
+% computing solutions to these problems include: Air-gapping, separation of concerns, extreme case: HSMs and TEEs
+% provide security even during compromise
+% interesting parallel to state control / anarchy discourse above:
+% they are secure even against the state/police if implemented correctly
+% observation: competent hackers are about as competent as competent police
+% observation: cannot digitally encode ethics or legal stuff, so no "good guys only" backdoors
+
+% other applications of this principle of distrusting systems are (perfect) forward secrecy
+% see signal
+% however, system such as TEEs and HSMs are largely a niche solution
+% while some are widely deployed, e.g. TEEs for DRM and as secure boot root of trust in phones, desktops
+% they are not usually democratic. despite wide deployment authority is with their manufacturer.
+% To ordinary users, these capabilities are distant
+% EU regulation was necessary to force apple to open up some APIs cf. nfc payment
+% normal users are shit out of luck
+
+% Thus, we need new tools. Tools that enable normal people / small orgs to assume control of their data/keys/etc.
+% we need to open up the power of TEEs to everybody
+% right now, open source is often less secure than closed-source
+% trusted boot rarely implemented (right) in open source
+% no TEE security at all because of lack of access
+% we want to create democratic, open source HSMs
+
+% open source HSMs enable many use cases to the public and small orgs that up to now only large corps or states could do
+% email encryption
+% secure group messaging
+% signing key servers
+% secure video / audio calls
+% private data storage
+% things like that twitter/x protocol for pin-based key recovery
+% timestamping / attestation services
+% base for distributed consensus protocols
+% might have applications in cryptocurrencies when operated as heterogenous cluster
+
+% but beyond that, they enable entirely new use cases.
+% conventional hsms limited in computing power, crippled for the purpose of market segmentation
+% ours are much more powerful, enable much higher computation crypto such as generic smpc
+% generic smpc can do things like key management, pin-based security, secret statistics etc.
+% furthermore, above we noted parallel between anarchist distrust of authority and core cryptographic principles
+% our hsms not only protect against classical attackers, but also against states
+% can be used as democratic check and balance
+% example: secure comms that cannot be accessed by the state / police
+% example: secure, authenticated photo and video capture
+% that's especially relevant in the age of ai
+
+%\section{The Trust Perspective}