Give all figures and tables concise short titles

chapter-hsms/chapter.tex

@@ -292,9 +292,10 @@ devices we selected for this study.
         H31 & PED & SumUp & SumUp 3G & 2019 \\ 
         H32 & PED & SumUp & SumUp Air & 2022 \\ 
     \end{tabular}
-    \caption{The specimens we dissected in our survey. PED stands for \emph{Pin Entry Device}, the industry term for
+    \caption[Tamper sensing mesh survey specimen list]{The specimens we dissected in our survey. PED stands for
-        card payment terminals that have sufficient security to handle credit card PINs. EPP stands for \emph{Encrypting
+        \emph{Pin Entry Device}, the industry term for card payment terminals that have sufficient security to handle
-        Pin Pad}, the type of keypad used for pin entry on ATMs. HSM stands for Hardware Security Module.}
+        credit card PINs. EPP stands for \emph{Encrypting Pin Pad}, the type of keypad used for pin entry on ATMs. HSM
+        stands for Hardware Security Module.}
     \label{tab_hsm_survey_sample_list}
 \end{table}
 
@@ -339,7 +340,7 @@ devices we selected for this study.
         \surveypic{31}{survey_diag_S31.jpg}\\
         \surveypic{32}{survey_diag_S32.jpg}&
     \end{tabular}
-    \caption{External photos of all survey specimens.}
+    \caption[Tamper sensing mesh survey specimen external photos]{External photos of all survey specimens.}
     \label{fig_hsm_survey_sample_pics}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -470,7 +471,7 @@ necessary to soften polymer compounds and to break glue joints.
         % overlapping the previous row
         \rule{0pt}{25mm}
     \end{tabular}
-    \caption{Internal overview photos of the survey specimens.}
+    \caption[Tamper sensing mesh survey specimen internal photos]{Internal overview photos of the survey specimens.}
     \label{fig_hsm_survey_sample_internal_pics}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -598,7 +599,8 @@ list, we will address several common structural features that we observed across
         \caption{Screen printing process using carbon ink (specimen~\sampleno{H30}).}
         \label{hsm_fig_materials_carbon_ink}
     \end{subfigure}
-    \caption[Mesh materials]{Materials and manufacturing processes used for mesh traces and contacts.}
+    \caption[Mesh materials and manufacturing processes]{Materials and manufacturing processes used for mesh traces and
+        contacts.}
     \label{hsm_fig_materials}
 \end{figure}
 

chapter-ihsm/chapter.tex

@@ -67,10 +67,10 @@ This chapter contains the following contributions:
 \begin{figure}
     \center
     \includegraphics[width=12cm]{prototype_pic2.jpg}
-    \caption{The prototype as we used it to test power transfer and bidirectional communication between stator and
+    \caption[Inertial HSM prototype]{The prototype as we used it to test power transfer and bidirectional communication
-    rotor.  This picture shows the proof-of-concept prototype's configuration that we used for accelerometer
+    between stator and rotor.  This picture shows the proof-of-concept prototype's configuration that we used for
-    characterization (Section~\ref{sec_accel_meas}) without the vertical security mesh struts that connect the circular
+    accelerometer characterization (Section~\ref{sec_accel_meas}) without the vertical security mesh struts that connect
-    top and bottom outer meshes.}
+    the circular top and bottom outer meshes.}
     \label{prototype_picture}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -335,8 +335,8 @@ shaft penetrates the mesh to simplify mechanical construction.
 \begin{figure}
     \center
     \includegraphics{concept_vis_one_axis.pdf}
-    \caption{Concept of a simple spinning Inertial HSM. 1 - Shaft. 2 - Security mesh. 3 - Payload. 4 -
+    \caption[Inertial HSM concept visualization]{Concept of a simple spinning Inertial HSM. 1 - Shaft. 2 - Security
-    Accelerometer. 5 - Shaft penetrating security mesh.}
+    mesh. 3 - Payload. 4 - Accelerometer. 5 - Shaft penetrating security mesh.}
     \label{fig_schema_one_axis}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -586,11 +586,11 @@ kind of mechanical tool.
 \begin{figure}
     \center
     \includegraphics[width=6cm]{attack-robot.pdf}
-    \caption{Schematic overview of a robotic rotating-stage attack. An optical sensor (1) observes the IHSM's rotation
+    \caption[Inertial HSM attack robot scenario]{Schematic overview of a robotic rotating-stage attack. An optical
-    and adjusts the setpoint of a servo motor (2) that rotates the attack stage (3). On the rotating attack stage, a
+    sensor (1) observes the IHSM's rotation and adjusts the setpoint of a servo motor (2) that rotates the attack stage
-    remote-controlled manipulator (4) is mounted that deactivates the security mesh (7) and creates an opening (5).
+    (3). On the rotating attack stage, a remote-controlled manipulator (4) is mounted that deactivates the security mesh
-    Through this opening, a human operator can then insert tools such as probes to read out sensitive information from
+    (7) and creates an opening (5). Through this opening, a human operator can then insert tools such as probes to read
-    the actual payload (6).}
+    out sensitive information from the actual payload (6).}
     \label{fig_attack_robot}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -650,7 +650,8 @@ same effect. Figure~\ref{shaft_cm} shows variations of the shaft interface with
         \caption{A second moving tamper detection mesh also enables more complex topographies.}
         \label{shaft_cm_a}
     \end{subfigure}
-    \caption{Mechanical countermeasures to attacks through or close to the shaft of a fixed-axis rotating IHSM.}
+    \caption[IHSM shaft mechanical attack countermeasures]{Mechanical countermeasures to attacks through or close to the
+        shaft of a fixed-axis rotating IHSM.}
     \label{shaft_cm}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -756,7 +757,7 @@ files.
         \center 
         \caption{Assembled mechanical prototype rotor (left) and stator (right) PCB components.}
     \end{subfigure}
-    \caption{Our proof-of-concept prototype IHSM's PCB security mesh design}
+    \caption[IHSM PCB rotor and stator prototypes]{Our proof-of-concept prototype IHSM's PCB security mesh design}
     \label{fig_proto_mesh}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -775,7 +776,7 @@ files.
         \caption{Detail of a PCB produced with a generated mesh.}
         \label{mesh_gen_sample}
     \end{subfigure}
-    \caption{Our automatic security mesh generation process}
+    \caption[Automatic security mesh generation process visualization]{Our automatic security mesh generation process}
     \label{mesh_gen_fig}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -855,7 +856,7 @@ are shielded from one another by the motor's body in the center of the PCB.
         stray capacitances.}
         \label{photolink_schematic}
     \end{subfigure}
-    \caption{IR data link implementation}
+    \caption[IHSM IR data link implementation]{IR data link implementation}
 \end{figure}
 
 \subsection{Evaluation}
@@ -965,10 +966,10 @@ the fly, without stopping the rotor.
 \begin{figure}
     \center
     \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{fig-acc-theory-meas-run50.pdf}
-    \caption{Centrifugal acceleration versus angular frequency in theory and in our experiments. Experimental
+    \caption[Centrifugal acceleration versus angular frequency]{Centrifugal acceleration versus angular frequency in
-    measurements are shown after correction for offset and scale error.  Above \SI{300}{rpm}, the relative error is
+        theory and in our experiments. Experimental measurements are shown after correction for offset and scale error.
-    below $\SI{0.5}{\percent}$. Below $\SI{300}{rpm}$, the residual offset error has a large impact ($0.05\,g$ absolute
+        Above \SI{300}{rpm}, the relative error is below $\SI{0.5}{\percent}$. Below $\SI{300}{rpm}$, the residual
-    or $8\%$ relative at $\SI{95}{rpm}$.)}
+        offset error has a large impact ($0.05\,g$ absolute or $8\%$ relative at $\SI{95}{rpm}$.)}
     \label{fig-acc-theory}
 \end{figure}
 

chapter-introduction/chapter.tex

@@ -28,14 +28,14 @@ While at a glance it might sound like a fringe position held by people from the
 it enjoys support far beyond those circles and throughout mainstream academic cryptography. The aversion of
 cryptographers against backdoor access shows up everywhere. From cryptographic protocol standards like TLS, to
 cryptographic applications like the Signal messenger, backdoor access is not only excluded from the system design, its
-possibility is considered a potential vulnerability. Measures such as forward secrecy and post-compromise security are
+possibility is considered a potential vulnerability.
-taken to mitigate its impact. In computing, this design aspect makes cryptographic protocols a unique holdout. In other
+% Measures such as forward secrecy and post-compromise security are taken to mitigate its impact. In computing, this
-parts of the stack, explicit or implicit backdoor access is commonplace, and attempts at preventing it are rare. For
+% design aspect makes cryptographic protocols a unique holdout. In other parts of the stack, explicit or implicit
-instance, network providers are generally required to comply with so-called \emph{Lawful Interception} orders on
+% backdoor access is commonplace, and attempts at preventing it are rare. For instance, network providers are generally
-particular customers or traffic types, and datacenter operators commonly provide hardware access to state authorities.
+% required to comply with so-called \emph{Lawful Interception} orders on particular customers or traffic types, and
-The design decisions in cryptographic protocols generally hold, and the gold standard for backdoor access to modern
+% datacenter operators commonly provide hardware access to state authorities. The design decisions in cryptographic
-systems is either exploiting a \emph{zero-day} flaw that is not yet publically known, or acquiring physical access to
+% protocols generally hold, and the gold standard for backdoor access to modern systems is either exploiting a
-the target system. \todo{Make sure all figures have nice short titles for list of figures}
+% \emph{zero-day} flaw that is not yet publically known, or acquiring physical access to the target system.
 
 \section{Research Questions}
 

chapter-nice-coils/chapter.tex

@@ -64,8 +64,9 @@ circuits.
         \subcaptionbox{\raggedright Our proposed inductor layout}{
             \includegraphics[width=0.28\textwidth]{svg_vis_paper.png}}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{Illustration of our proposed inductor layout compared to contemporary conventional planar inductors and
+    \caption[Planar inductor layout comparison]{Illustration of our proposed inductor layout compared to contemporary
-        honeycomb as well as basket-woven coils from the early days of wireless radio.}
+        conventional planar inductors and honeycomb as well as basket-woven coils from the early days of wireless
+        radio.}
     \label{fig_illust_honeycomb_basket}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -378,9 +379,9 @@ scheme~\cite{lopeFirstSelfResonant2021,sproHighVoltageInsulationDesign2021,leePr
     \begin{center}
         \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{nk_combined.pdf}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{Inductor layouts for several sets of turn count $n$ and inversion count $k$. The top row shows the actual
+    \caption[Basic twisted planar inductor layouts]{Inductor layouts for several sets of turn count $n$ and inversion
-    trace layout in cartesian coordinates, the bottom row visualizes the winding schema.
+        count $k$. The top row shows the actual trace layout in cartesian coordinates, the bottom row visualizes the
-    }
+        winding schema.}
     \label{fig_nk_combined}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -388,8 +389,9 @@ scheme~\cite{lopeFirstSelfResonant2021,sproHighVoltageInsulationDesign2021,leePr
     \begin{center}
         \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{nk_complex_illust.pdf}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{Layout examples for a number of combinations of turn count $n$ and inversion count $k$. Note that in this
+    \caption[Complex twisted planar inductor layout variants]{Layout examples for a number of combinations of turn count
-    illustration we chose values for $n$ and $k$ such that all pairs are coprime.}
+        $n$ and inversion count $k$. Note that in this illustration we chose values for $n$ and $k$ such that all pairs
+        are coprime.}
     \label{fig_nk_complex_illust}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -670,10 +672,11 @@ additional cost and without compromising other performance parameters.
         $25$& $37$& $18.15$&  $6.0$&    $2.0197$& $15.9$&   $17.100$& $0.2$&    $2.000$&  $15.1$&   $\textbf{17.066}$&  $10.31$&  $1.698$\\
 
     \end{tabular}
-    \caption{Inductor sample design parameters and measured characteristics. All inductors have outer diameter
+    \caption[Inductor sample design parameters and measured characteristics.]{Inductor sample design parameters and
-        \qty{35}{\milli\meter} and inner diameter \qty{15}{\milli\meter}. The missing values in the simulation results
+        measured characteristics. All inductors have outer diameter \qty{35}{\milli\meter} and inner diameter
-        columns result from the solver failing to converge. Bolded values highlight the best performing coil of each
+        \qty{15}{\milli\meter}. The missing values in the simulation results columns result from the solver failing to
-        turn count. Shaded rows indicate conventional two-layer planar inductors ($k=1$).}
+        converge. Bolded values highlight the best performing coil of each turn count. Shaded rows indicate conventional
+        two-layer planar inductors ($k=1$).}
     \label{tab_coupons}
 \end{sidewaystable}
 
@@ -740,9 +743,9 @@ indicating a contribution from flux linkage.
         $75$&$90$&$53$  &$320$& $461$&          $76.2$&          $8.75$&           $0.72$\\
         $75$&$90$&$53$  &$480$& $\mathbf{470}$& $92.9$&          $8.00$&           $0.84$\\
     \end{tabular}
-    \caption{Parameters and measurement results of a set of larger sample inductors. Bold values indicate best
+    \caption[Parameters and measurement results of larger sample inductors.]{Parameters and measurement results of a set
-        performance at a given size. Shaded rows indicate conventional planar toroidal ($n=1$) or two-layer planar
+        of larger sample inductors. Bold values indicate best performance at a given size. Shaded rows indicate
-        spiral inductors ($k=1$).}
+        conventional planar toroidal ($n=1$) or two-layer planar spiral inductors ($k=1$).}
     \label{tab_wide_coils}
 \end{table}
 
@@ -760,9 +763,9 @@ angles to one another.
     \begin{center}
         \includegraphics[width=.65\textwidth]{test_schematic.pdf}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{The test schematic used in all measurements. For direct coupling factor measurements, the load resistor was
+    \caption[Planar inductor test schematic]{The test schematic used in all measurements. For direct coupling factor
-    disconnected. We measure voltage at the output of the function generator to account for drop in its internal output
+        measurements, the load resistor was disconnected. We measure voltage at the output of the function generator to
-    resistance.}
+        account for drop in its internal output resistance.}
     \label{fig_test_schematic}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -775,10 +778,10 @@ using Keysight 34465A multimeters in AC Root Mean Square (RMS) mode.
     \begin{center}
         \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{symmetry_3turn_n_twist.pdf}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{RMS output voltage of the test circuit from Figure\ \ref{fig_test_schematic} for three pairs of matching
+    \caption[Planar inductor voltage ripple versus rotation angle]{RMS output voltage of the test circuit from Figure\
-    inductors with one inductor rotating w.r.t.\ the other. The inductors have $n=3$ turns each and $k=\frac{1}{2}$,
+        \ref{fig_test_schematic} for three pairs of matching inductors with one inductor rotating w.r.t.\ the other. The
-    $k=1$, and $k=3$, respectively. For each $k$, voltage curves are plotted for a number of different radial offsets
+        inductors have $n=3$ turns each and $k=\frac{1}{2}$, $k=1$, and $k=3$, respectively. For each $k$, voltage
-    between the two inductor's centers.}
+        curves are plotted for a number of different radial offsets between the two inductor's centers.}
     \label{fig_symmetry_3turn_n_twist}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -810,12 +813,12 @@ pitch, as their turns deviate the furthest from a set of ideal, concentric circl
     \begin{center}
         \includegraphics[width=.65\textwidth]{k_ripple_plot.pdf}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{RMS Voltage ripple in a model rotating WPT setup with $R_L=\qty{10}{\ohm}$ as a percentage of total RMS
+    \caption[Planar inductor voltage ripple versus design parameter]{RMS Voltage ripple in a model rotating WPT setup
-    output voltage, plotted against inductor inversion count $k$. Measurements were taken with a number of different
+        with $R_L=\qty{10}{\ohm}$ as a percentage of total RMS output voltage, plotted against inductor inversion count
-    coils with turn count $n$ between a single turn and $25$ turns. Measurements were taken at two different radial coil
+        $k$. Measurements were taken with a number of different coils with turn count $n$ between a single turn and $25$
-    offsets of $r=\qty{1}{\milli\meter}$ and $\qty{4}{\milli\meter}$. Coil distance was $d=\qty{1}{\milli\meter}$ in all
+        turns. Measurements were taken at two different radial coil offsets of $r=\qty{1}{\milli\meter}$ and
-    cases. The shaded area indicates conventional coil layouts, with the remainder of the plot showing twisted
+        $\qty{4}{\milli\meter}$. Coil distance was $d=\qty{1}{\milli\meter}$ in all cases. The shaded area indicates
-    inductors.}
+        conventional coil layouts, with the remainder of the plot showing twisted inductors.}
     \label{fig_k_ripple_plot}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -838,12 +841,13 @@ pitch, as their turns deviate the furthest from a set of ideal, concentric circl
     \begin{center}
         \includegraphics[width=.65\textwidth]{rms_ripple_double_rotation_n3_r4.pdf}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{RMS ripple magnitude as a percentage of mean RMS output voltage, plotted against the rotation of each of
+    \caption[Planar inductor voltage ripple versus both angles for $n=3, k=\{0,1,4\}$]{RMS ripple magnitude as a
-    the two inductors. The two coils were kept at a constant \qty{4}{\milli\meter} radial offset, and the output coil
+        percentage of mean RMS output voltage, plotted against the rotation of each of the two inductors. The two coils
-    was loaded with a \qty{10}{\ohm} load. All RMS ripple plots in this chapter share the same color scale to allow for
+        were kept at a constant \qty{4}{\milli\meter} radial offset, and the output coil was loaded with a
-    visual comparison. This figure shows four variants of 3-turn coils, plots for $n=5$ can be found in Figure\
+        \qty{10}{\ohm} load. All RMS ripple plots in this chapter share the same color scale to allow for visual
-    \ref{fig_rms_ripple_n5} and plots for $n=\{10,25\}$ in Figures \ref{fig_rms_ripple_n10} and
+        comparison. This figure shows four variants of 3-turn coils, plots for $n=5$ can be found in Figure\
-    \ref{fig_rms_ripple_n25}.}
+        \ref{fig_rms_ripple_n5} and plots for $n=\{10,25\}$ in Figures \ref{fig_rms_ripple_n10} and
+        \ref{fig_rms_ripple_n25}.}
     \label{fig_rms_ripple_n3}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -851,7 +855,8 @@ pitch, as their turns deviate the furthest from a set of ideal, concentric circl
     \begin{center}
         \includegraphics[width=.65\textwidth]{rms_ripple_double_rotation_n10_r4.pdf}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{RMS ripple magnitude as shown in Figure\ \ref{fig_rms_ripple_n3} for four different 10-turn coils.}
+    \caption[Planar inductor voltage ripple versus both angles for $n=10, k=\{0,1,3,7\}$]{RMS ripple magnitude as shown
+        in Figure\ \ref{fig_rms_ripple_n3} for four different 10-turn coils.}
     \label{fig_rms_ripple_n10}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -859,7 +864,8 @@ pitch, as their turns deviate the furthest from a set of ideal, concentric circl
     \begin{center}
         \includegraphics[width=.65\textwidth]{rms_ripple_double_rotation_n25_r4.pdf}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{RMS ripple magnitude as shown in Figure\ \ref{fig_rms_ripple_n3} for four different 25-turn coils.}
+    \caption[Planar inductor voltage ripple versus both angles for $n=25, k=\{0,1,3,13\}$]{RMS ripple magnitude as shown
+        in Figure\ \ref{fig_rms_ripple_n3} for four different 25-turn coils.}
     \label{fig_rms_ripple_n25}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -867,7 +873,8 @@ pitch, as their turns deviate the furthest from a set of ideal, concentric circl
     \begin{center}
         \includegraphics[width=.65\textwidth]{rms_ripple_double_rotation_n5_r4.pdf}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{RMS ripple magnitude as shown in Figure\ \ref{fig_rms_ripple_n3} for four different 5-turn coils.}
+    \caption[Planar inductor voltage ripple versus both angles for $n=5, k=\{0,1,3,7\}$]{RMS ripple magnitude as shown
+        in Figure\ \ref{fig_rms_ripple_n3} for four different 5-turn coils.}
     \label{fig_rms_ripple_n5}
 \end{figure}
 

chapter-qkd/chapter.tex

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ requirements of a QKD system.
     \begin{center}
         \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{fiber_passthrough_mech_model__8290_small_annotations.pdf}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{Photo of our mechanical prototype.
+    \caption[QKD fiber passthrough prototype mechanical prototype]{Photo of our mechanical prototype.
     1 - Bracket connecting payload and shaft with hidden spiral conduit for optical fibers.
     2 - Upper tamper sensing mesh PCB. 
     3 - Outer IHSM tamper sensing mesh cage.
@@ -434,13 +434,13 @@ resulted in a difference below the measurement floor of approximately \qty{0.25}
         \hspace*{5mm}
         \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fiber_passthrough_mech_model__8292_small.jpg}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{An disassembled view of our optical passthrough mechanical prototype. The fiber is passed through from the
+    \caption[QKD fiber passthrough mechanical model components]{A disassembled view of our optical passthrough
-    shaft going through the IHSM's primary tamper sensing mesh cage to the outside into the interior of the IHSM through
+        mechanical prototype. The fiber is passed through from the shaft going through the IHSM's primary tamper sensing
-    the green bracket. A secondary tamper sensing mesh is located on the inside of the shaft interface and driven
+        mesh cage to the outside into the interior of the IHSM through the green bracket. A secondary tamper sensing
-    separately. In this prototype, the secondary mesh is driven by a cooling fan. Both independently rotating meshes
+        mesh is located on the inside of the shaft interface and driven separately. In this prototype, the secondary
-    have tabs that extend into the bracket such that they do not interfere, but reduce the space available to an
+        mesh is driven by a cooling fan. Both independently rotating meshes have tabs that extend into the bracket such
-    attacker. The HSM's primary mesh cage is partially shown in white.
+        that they do not interfere, but reduce the space available to an attacker. The HSM's primary mesh cage is
-    }
+        partially shown in white.}
     \label{fig_pic_proto_detail}
 \end{figure}
 

chapter-sampling-mesh-monitor/chapter.tex

@@ -54,9 +54,10 @@ specialty components.
 \begin{figure}
     \centering
     \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{pic_board_setup_2_small.jpg}
-    \caption{Measurement setup. Shown are the test specimen board on the left, and the frontend board with one of the
+    \caption[Sampling mesh monitor prototype and test coupon]{Measurement setup. Shown are the test specimen board on
-    four pulse amplifiers in the center. The frontend board is powered through a USB-C connection, and data is sent to a
+        the left, and the frontend board with one of the four pulse amplifiers in the center. The frontend board is
-    computer through a Single-Wire Debug (SWD) interface. The grid in the background has \qty{10}{\milli\meter} pitch.}
+        powered through a USB-C connection, and data is sent to a computer through a Single-Wire Debug (SWD) interface.
+        The grid in the background has \qty{10}{\milli\meter} pitch.}
     \label{fig_pic_board}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -399,7 +400,8 @@ attack tools, or specialized tools for large-scale industrial manufacturing such
     \centering
     \hspace*{-7mm}
     \includegraphics[height=80mm]{block_diagram.pdf}
-    \caption{Block diagram of our prototype sampling TDR security mesh monitoring circuit.}
+    \caption[Sampling mesh monitor circuit block diagram]{Block diagram of our prototype sampling TDR security mesh
+        monitoring circuit.}
     \label{fig_block_diagram}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -480,10 +482,10 @@ such as the CML-output comparators made by Analog Devices due to cost.
         \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{pic_pi3hdx_small.jpg}
         \caption{PI3HDX12211}
     \end{subfigure}
-    \caption{Implementation of the pulse amplifier variants of the design. Amplifiers were mounted dead bug style on
+    \caption[Sampling mesh monitor pulse amplifier implementations]{Implementation of the pulse amplifier variants of
-    copper tape and connected with \qty{120}{\micro\meter} wire. Supply rails were connected with copper tape where
+        the design. Amplifiers were mounted dead bug style on copper tape and connected with \qty{120}{\micro\meter}
-    possible to reduce impedance. MLCC power supply decoupling capacitors were placed on the copper tape to reduce loop
+        wire. Supply rails were connected with copper tape where possible to reduce impedance. MLCC power supply
-    area.}
+        decoupling capacitors were placed on the copper tape to reduce loop area.}
     \label{fig_pic_amps}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -539,8 +541,8 @@ of Xilinx 7 Series FPGAs provides the same $\frac{1}{32}$ clock cycle resolution
         N/A&25&0.01&Various resistors\\\hline
         \multicolumn{2}{r}{}&\textbf{9.67}&\textbf{Total}
     \end{tabular}
-    \caption{Cost breakdown of our prototype design. Prices are listed at order quantity 1000 to make prices more
+    \caption[Prototype design cost breakdown]{Cost breakdown of our prototype design. Prices are listed at order
-    comparable between distributors.}
+        quantity 1000 to make prices more comparable between distributors.}
     \label{tab_bom}
 \end{table}
 
@@ -648,10 +650,10 @@ turn-on knee of the sampling diodes.
         \end{subfigure}
     \end{center}
     \vspace*{-5mm}
-    \caption{Spectrum measurements and reconstructed time domain edge shape of the stimulus pulse
+    \caption[Sampling mesh monitor stimulus pulse spectrum measurements]{Spectrum measurements and reconstructed time
-        measured at the mesh interface for each of the four driver ICs, captured using a spectrum analyzer. Vertical
+        domain edge shape of the stimulus pulse measured at the mesh interface for each of the four driver ICs, captured
-        scale shows arbitrary units. Spectrum plots include a $\frac{1}{f}$ reference curve indicating an ideal
+        using a spectrum analyzer. Vertical scale shows arbitrary units. Spectrum plots include a $\frac{1}{f}$
-        infinite-bandwidth square wave.}
+        reference curve indicating an ideal infinite-bandwidth square wave.}
     \label{fig_spec_risetime}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -678,8 +680,9 @@ slower than the raw pulse rise time value alone would suggest.
     \begin{center}
         \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{fig_edge_risetime.pdf}\vspace*{-7mm}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{One edge of the stimulus pulse with no mesh connected measured by the board itself, using different
+    \caption[Sampling mesh monitor pulse self-characterization]{One edge of the stimulus pulse with no mesh connected
-    amplifier ICs. For each IC, ten traces are shown. The vertical scale is in Volts at the sampling amplifier output.}
+        measured by the board itself, using different amplifier ICs. For each IC, ten traces are shown. The vertical
+        scale is in Volts at the sampling amplifier output.}
     \label{fig_edge_risetime}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -717,10 +720,11 @@ slower than the raw pulse rise time value alone would suggest.
             \qty{2.25}{\volt\per\nano\second}
         \end{tabular}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{Single-ended stimulus edge rise times for different amplifier ICs. The single-ended rise times of both
+    \caption[Single-ended stimulus edge rise times for different amplifier ICs]{Single-ended stimulus edge rise times
-    positive and negative half of the differential pair have been averaged. External measurements are from Figure\
+        for different amplifier ICs. The single-ended rise times of both positive and negative half of the differential
-    \ref{fig_spec_risetime}, measuring the stimulus pulse at the mesh interface. $V_{pp}$ measurements are taken at the
+        pair have been averaged. External measurements are from Figure\ \ref{fig_spec_risetime}, measuring the stimulus
-    mesh interface. Effective slew rates are calculated from the external measurements and pulse $V{pp}$.}
+        pulse at the mesh interface. $V_{pp}$ measurements are taken at the mesh interface. Effective slew rates are
+        calculated from the external measurements and pulse $V{pp}$.}
     \label{tab_edge_risetime}
 \end{table}
 
@@ -807,8 +811,8 @@ lines here and for \partno{TDP0604} since the other amplifiers' output did not c
             \qty{26}{\nano\second}\\
         \end{tabular}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{Specifications of mesh test specimens used in the experiments in this chapter. Approximate signal delays
+    \caption[Mesh test specimen specifications]{Specifications of mesh test specimens used in the experiments in this
-        were calculated using wave velocity
+        chapter. Approximate signal delays were calculated using wave velocity
         $v=\frac{c}{\sqrt{\epsilon_r}}\approx\frac{c}{2}$~\cite{wheelerTransmissionLinePropertiesParallel1965} assuming
         $\epsilon_r\approx 4$~\cite{mumbyDielectricPropertiesFR41989} for the test specimens' \partno{FR-4} substrate.}
     \label{tab_mesh_spec}
@@ -844,9 +848,10 @@ switching.
         \includegraphics[width=.8\textwidth]{fig_mesh_length.pdf}
         \vspace*{-10mm}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{TDR responses captured by the microcontroller's internal ADCs with each of four candidate pulse amplifier
+    \caption[Sampling mesh monitor time-domain responses versus mesh length and amplifier]{TDR responses captured by the
-        ICs and four test meshes. The shown time range covers the primary reflection of the stimulus pulse's falling
+        microcontroller's internal ADCs with each of four candidate pulse amplifier ICs and four test meshes. The shown
-        edge. For clarity, only one channel of the differential response is shown.}
+        time range covers the primary reflection of the stimulus pulse's falling edge. For clarity, only one channel of
+        the differential response is shown.}
     \label{fig_mesh_length}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -891,8 +896,8 @@ switching.
             $\qty{1.59d8}{\meter\per\second}$\\
         \end{tabular}
     \end{center}
-    \caption{Speed of light and time offset calculated from delays read from the graphs in Figure\
+    \caption[Speed of light calculations]{Speed of light and time offset calculated from delays read from the graphs in
-    \ref{fig_mesh_length}. $c$ is the speed of light determined by linear fit.}
+        Figure\ \ref{fig_mesh_length}. $c$ is the speed of light determined by linear fit.}
     \label{tab_speed_of_light}
 \end{table}
 
@@ -992,8 +997,9 @@ indicates good performance of our design, and increases the detection efficiency
         \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{fig_covar_short_across_traces_p0.4.pdf}
         \caption{Both traces shorted, p=\qty{0.4}{\milli\meter}. FNR 0.0\% at 0.1\% FPR, CER=0\%.}
     \end{subfigure}
-    \caption{Similarity matrix of 10 intact and 10 modified meshes with two pitch sizes under two
+    \caption[Similarity matrices of modified meshes under different attack scenarios]{Similarity matrix of 10 intact and
-        different attack scenarios: An interrupted trace, and both mesh traces shorted.}
+        10 modified meshes with two pitch sizes under two different attack scenarios: An interrupted trace, and both
+        mesh traces shorted.}
     \label{fig_covar_basic_attacks}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -1006,8 +1012,8 @@ location of the reflected pulse edge, resulting in 0\% Crossover Error Rate.
 \begin{figure}
     \centering
     \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth,trim=0 5mm 0 5mm]{fig_covar_short_within_0.3.pdf}
-    \caption{Similarity matrix of several mesh specimens that have one trace shorted to an
+    \caption[Similarity matrix of shorted meshes]{Similarity matrix of several mesh specimens that have one trace
-        adjacent location on the same trace. Classification FNR 23\% at 0.1\% FPR, CER=22\%.}
+        shorted to an adjacent location on the same trace. Classification FNR 23\% at 0.1\% FPR, CER=22\%.}
     \label{fig_short_within}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -1116,9 +1122,10 @@ distribution shifts.
         \vspace*{2mm}
         \label{fig_drill_mod_shape_pic}
     \end{subfigure}
-    \caption{The mesh response under a manipulation attack patching across a drill location for a 
+    \caption[Time-domain mesh response differences during manipulation attack]{The mesh response under a manipulation
-        \qty{300}{\micro\meter} drill, as captured by the microcontroller's ADCs. The mesh pitch is
+        attack patching across a drill location for a \qty{300}{\micro\meter} drill, as captured by the
-        \qty{300}{\micro\meter}. B-spline smoothing was applied for readability.}
+        microcontroller's ADCs. The mesh pitch is \qty{300}{\micro\meter}. B-spline smoothing was applied for
+        readability.}
     \label{fig_drill_mod_shape}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -1148,8 +1155,8 @@ only benchmark a momentary snapshot after the patch was completed.
         \caption{\emph{maximum} classifier variant. FNR 51.1\% at 0.1\% FPR, CER=15\%.}
         \label{fig_patch_large_scale_minmax}
     \end{subfigure}
-    \caption{Classification performance in a larger-scale experiment using 10 measurements each of
+    \caption[Classification performance in a large-scale experiment]{Classification performance in a larger-scale
-        7 samples with traces patched through micro-soldering.}
+        experiment using 10 measurements each of 7 samples with traces patched through micro-soldering.}
     \label{fig_patch_large_scale}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -1202,8 +1209,8 @@ domain based on a temperature measurement.
 \begin{figure}
     \centering
     \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{fig_tempco_edited.pdf}
-    \caption{The effect of heating on a time-domain trace. One of 12 channels shown. Gray: Raw data. Black: Relative
+    \caption[The effect of heating on a time-domain trace]{The effect of heating on a time-domain trace. One of 12
-    difference between hot and cool cases.}
+        channels shown. Gray: Raw data. Black: Relative difference between hot and cool cases.}
     \label{fig_tempco_time}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -1221,9 +1228,9 @@ classification performance remaining approximately constant at 69.0\% FNR at 0.1
     % NOTE: not actually "tridelta" data, I'm just too lazy to rename these and fix up the notebook.
     \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{fig_covar_patch_repeat_tridelta_all_the_data_p0.3.pdf}
     \hspace*{2mm}
-    \caption{Classifier similarity scores of measurements in different environments, 10
+    \caption[Classifier similarity scores of measurements in different environments]{Classifier similarity scores of
-        measurements each. For scale, measurements from Figure~\ref{fig_patch_large_scale} are included on the
+        measurements in different environments, 10 measurements each. For scale, measurements from
-        bottom/right. FNR 69.0\% at 0.1\% FPR, CER=22\%.}~
+        Figure~\ref{fig_patch_large_scale} are included on the bottom/right. FNR 69.0\% at 0.1\% FPR, CER=22\%.}
     \label{fig_env_covar}
 \end{figure}
 

chapter-smpc/chapter.tex

@@ -246,9 +246,9 @@ server cooling components~\cite{coroamaPossibleFutureTrends2025}.
         16 & Memory~\cite{kennedyDDR4DIMMsSystem2017} &\qty{2}{\watt}&\qty{32}{\watt}\\
         1 & Losses & \qty{40}{\watt}&\qty{40}{\watt}\\
     \end{tabular}
-    \caption{Power budget of a modern mid-range server. Losses were estimated at 10\%, consistent with mainboard losses
+    \caption[Power budget of a modern mid-range server.]{Power budget of a modern mid-range server. Losses were
-        plus losses from a 80plus platinum efficiency certified power supply (~94\% at load).
+        estimated at 10\%, consistent with mainboard losses plus losses from a 80plus platinum efficiency certified
-    }
+        power supply (~94\% at load).}
     \label{tab_power_budget}
 \end{table}
 

main.bib

@@ -2061,6 +2061,12 @@
   urldate = {2025-09-30}
 }
 
+@online{FunLCDsVisual,
+  title = {Fun with {{LCDs}} and {{Visual Cryptography}}},
+  url = {https://justi.cz/security/2020/07/30/lcd-crypto.html},
+  urldate = {2025-11-18}
+}
+
 @article{ganjiHighPerformancePlanar2017,
   title = {High Performance Planar Micro-Transformer Using Novel Crossover Connection},
   author = {Ganji, Bahram Azizollah and Molanzadeh, Mohammad},