paper: Add coupling experiment section
This commit is contained in:
parent
e324240250
commit
7db1999012
2 changed files with 26 additions and 3 deletions
Binary file not shown.
|
|
@ -306,10 +306,10 @@ In conclusion, we observe that twisted inductors \emph{improve} high-frequency p
|
|||
inductors while closely matching them in ESR and inductance. While they peform worse than simple single-layer inductors
|
||||
in high-frequency performance, the increased trace width that two-layer inductors allow for lowers resistive losses by
|
||||
approximately a factor of four. In applications where resistive losses lead to the choice of a two-layer inductor,
|
||||
twisted inductors provide improved high-frequency performance at no additional cost and without compromising on other
|
||||
twisted inductors provide improved high-frequency performance at no additional cost and without compromising other
|
||||
performance parameters.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{table}
|
||||
\begin{table*}
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{cc|ccc|}
|
||||
Turn Count $n$&
|
||||
Trace pair count $k$&
|
||||
|
|
@ -319,10 +319,33 @@ performance parameters.
|
|||
\end{tabular}
|
||||
\caption{Inductor sample design parameters and measured characteristics. All inductors have outer diameter
|
||||
\qty{35}{\milli\meter} and inner diameter \qty{15}{\milli\meter}.}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
\end{table*}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Coupling}
|
||||
|
||||
The key performance criterion in our application is the voltage ripple that appears on the secondary side of a WPT link
|
||||
when one of the inductors is rotating. To experimentally evaluate the magnitude of this ripple in a realistic scenario
|
||||
across a large set of rotations and relative displacements, we created a test setup consisting of a 3D gantry built from
|
||||
an old 3D printer, with a fourth rotation axis provided by a small servo that allows us to position two inductor test
|
||||
coupons at arbitrary offsets and angles to one another while measuring their coupling.
|
||||
|
||||
To evaluate a realistic scenario, we loaded the secondary inductor with a resistive load of \qty{10}{\ohm}, while
|
||||
providing a signal at a \qty{300}{\kilo\hertz} carrier frequency to the primary inductor from a Siglent SDG6022X
|
||||
function generator. We measured both the input and output voltages of the coupled inductor pair using Keysight 34465A
|
||||
multimeters in AC RMS mode. The results of these measurements, with the voltage ratio between the coupled inductors'
|
||||
input and output voltages graphed across one revolution in Figure\ \ref{symmetry_3turn_n_twist} for a set of three-turn
|
||||
inductors and in Figure\ \ref{symmetry_10turn_n_twist} for a set of 10-turn inductors with multiple trace pair amounts
|
||||
$k$.
|
||||
|
||||
From these graphs we observe slightly lower coupling for $k>0$ compared to a single-layer spiral inductor, which is
|
||||
in line with our previous inductance measurements. Across one revolution, we find that single-layer spiral inductors
|
||||
exhibit the worst voltage ripple, with simple two-layer inductors with $k=1$ already improving ripple by a large margin.
|
||||
Increasing $k$ above $1$ does not decrease the amplitude of this ripple further, but it does shift the ripple into
|
||||
higher frequencies that are easier to passively filter, as we originally intended.
|
||||
|
||||
\todo{new ripple measurements, concrete coupling factor measurements}
|
||||
\todo{schematics for illustration of measeurement circuits}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
%\includegraphics[width=0.7\linewidth]{figures/symmetry_3turn_n_twist.pdf}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue