Include reference to torus knots
This commit is contained in:
parent
d4907fd11c
commit
59d1f34d56
1 changed files with 34 additions and 32 deletions
|
|
@ -39,9 +39,7 @@
|
|||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
% TODO
|
||||
% Put picture on page 1
|
||||
% Term "twisted"? "interleaved spirals"?
|
||||
% Early pic / vis of spirals, somewhere in intro
|
||||
% Put explanation of WPT to front of related work
|
||||
% One plot instead of big table
|
||||
% Move measeurements column to the left?
|
||||
|
|
@ -69,6 +67,23 @@ Achieving Rotation-Invariant Coupling using Twisted Multi-Layer PCB Inductors}
|
|||
|
||||
\section{Introduction}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\subcaptionbox{\raggedright A classic planar spiral inductor}{
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.3\figurescale]{figures/svg_vis_paper_plain.png}}
|
||||
\subcaptionbox{\raggedright A honeycomb coil in \textcite{saackeRadiotechnikIIIEmpfanger1926}}{
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.2\figurescale]{figures/saacke-radiotechnik-3-ledionspule.jpg}}
|
||||
\subcaptionbox{\raggedright A basket-woven coil in \textcite{kleinSpulenUndSchwingungskreise1941}}{
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.2\figurescale]{figures/klein-spulen-schwingkreise-korbspule.jpg}}
|
||||
\subcaptionbox{\raggedright Our proposed inductor layout}{
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.3\figurescale]{figures/svg_vis_paper.png}}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\caption{Illustration of our proposed inductor layout compared to contemporary conventional planar inductors and
|
||||
honeycomb as well as basket-woven coils from the early days of wireless radio.}
|
||||
\textbf{TODO}: Not final graphics. Get proper scans for camera-ready version
|
||||
\label{fig_illust_honeycomb_basket}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
Inductive Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) is a widely used technology supported by a large corpus of research literature
|
||||
\cite{awuahNovelCoilDesign2023, batraEffectFerriteAddition2015, curranModelingCharacterizationPCB2015,
|
||||
fanSimultaneousWirelessPower2024, leeSimpleWirelessPower2017, liWirelessPowerTransfer2015,
|
||||
|
|
@ -123,12 +138,13 @@ gap between existing literature on low-power planar WPT inductor design and high
|
|||
\subsection{Twisted inductors}
|
||||
|
||||
In this paper, we propose a novel way of laying out circular PCB inductors that twists the inductor's windings around
|
||||
one another using a ring of vias each on the inside and outside of the inductor's windings. To fit our unique use case,
|
||||
we applied a principle which the polygonal basket-woven air coils used in early radio sets are based on to an approach
|
||||
inspired by contemporary planar inductor layouts. We show that we can layout a twisted inductor for any number of twists
|
||||
that is co-prime to the inductor's turn count, and that in fact, our approach opens up a large design space for inductor
|
||||
layouts that interpolate between planar spiral inductors on one end, and planar toroidal inductors on the other end. Our
|
||||
approach thus generalizes a number of previous approaches to the design of planar inductors.
|
||||
one another using a ring of vias each on the inside and outside of the inductor's windings. Our approach provides better
|
||||
performance beyond our particular use case, and improves over conventional contemporary planar inductors applying
|
||||
similar principles to those which inspired the polygonal basket-woven air coils used in early radio sets. We show that
|
||||
we can layout a twisted inductor for any number of twists that is co-prime to the inductor's turn count, and that in
|
||||
fact, our approach opens up a large design space for inductor layouts that interpolate between planar spiral inductors
|
||||
on one end, and planar toroidal inductors on the other end. Our approach thus generalizes a super-set to a number of
|
||||
previous approaches to the design of planar inductors.
|
||||
|
||||
We observe that in high-frequency applications, a moderate number of twists increases the spacing between the beginning
|
||||
and end of the inductor's conductor, where the majority of the inductor's AC current flows. This decreases the parasitic
|
||||
|
|
@ -185,22 +201,6 @@ surrounded by a minimum-size annular ring.} and increasing equivalent series res
|
|||
sections that are necessary to accomodate the via structure, as well as the layer pairing limitations when blind vias
|
||||
are used in multilayer PCBs.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\subcaptionbox{\raggedright A classic planar spiral inductor}{
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.3\figurescale]{figures/svg_vis_paper_plain.png}}
|
||||
\subcaptionbox{\raggedright A honeycomb coil in \textcite{saackeRadiotechnikIIIEmpfanger1926}}{
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.2\figurescale]{figures/saacke-radiotechnik-3-ledionspule.jpg}}
|
||||
\subcaptionbox{\raggedright A basket-woven coil in \textcite{kleinSpulenUndSchwingungskreise1941}}{
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.2\figurescale]{figures/klein-spulen-schwingkreise-korbspule.jpg}}
|
||||
\subcaptionbox{\raggedright Our proposed inductor layout}{
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.3\figurescale]{figures/svg_vis_paper.png}}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\caption{Illustrations of honeycomb and basket-woven coils from the early days of wireless radio.}
|
||||
\textbf{TODO}: Not final graphics. Get proper scans for camera-ready version
|
||||
\label{fig_illust_honeycomb_basket}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
This lack of a way to wind high frequency inductors with a machine led to the creation of a number of related winding
|
||||
schemes that include honeycomb and basket woven coils
|
||||
\cite{eppenAnforderungenEinzelteileRundfunkempfanger1927,
|
||||
|
|
@ -426,14 +426,16 @@ will call all layouts with $k\ge 2$ \emph{Twisted Inductors}.
|
|||
\label{fig_nk_combined}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
Figure\ \ref{fig_nk_combined} illustrates how we arrive at the coprimality requirement. \todo{Cleanly handle $k=0$
|
||||
case.} If we plot the spiral in polar coordinates on a cartesian plot we observe that for a $n$-turn coil with $k$
|
||||
inversions, the trace crosses the $\varphi$ axis once for each inversion, wrapping around $r$. Likewise, it crosses the
|
||||
$r$ axis once for each turn of the inductor, wrapping around $\varphi$. Based on this, we can re-label the angular axis
|
||||
in steps from $0$ to $k$, and re-label the radial axis in steps from $0$ to $n$. Labelling the new angular axis $i$ and
|
||||
the new radial axis $j$, in the resulting integer lattice, the trace has slope $1$. We can state the trace's trajectory
|
||||
as a function of a curve parameter $t \in [0, nk]$ as $f(t) = (i, j) = (t \mod n, t \mod k)$. To produce a valid
|
||||
inductor, the trace must not intersect anywhere. Thus, the system of congruences
|
||||
Topologically, the shape of our inductors can be described as a $(k, n)$-torus knot. From knot theory, we know that such
|
||||
a torus knot exists if and only if both $n$ and $k$ are co-prime. Figure\ \ref{fig_nk_combined} illustrates a derivation
|
||||
of the coprimality requirement. \todo{Cleanly handle $k=0$ case.} If we plot the spiral in polar coordinates on a
|
||||
cartesian plot we observe that for a $n$-turn coil with $k$ inversions, the trace crosses the $\varphi$ axis once for
|
||||
each inversion, wrapping around $r$. Likewise, it crosses the $r$ axis once for each turn of the inductor, wrapping
|
||||
around $\varphi$. Based on this, we can re-label the angular axis in steps from $0$ to $k$, and re-label the radial axis
|
||||
in steps from $0$ to $n$. Labelling the new angular axis $i$ and the new radial axis $j$, in the resulting integer
|
||||
lattice, the trace has slope $1$. We can state the trace's trajectory as a function of a curve parameter $t \in [0, nk]$
|
||||
as $f(t) = (i, j) = (t \mod n, t \mod k)$. To produce a valid inductor, the trace must not intersect anywhere. Thus, the
|
||||
system of congruences
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{align}
|
||||
t &\equiv i \mod n\\
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue