Last changes to changes letter

paper/tches-22-01-changes.tex

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ Inertial Hardware Security Modules. We thank the reveiwer for this helpful obser
 than two pages of new content on the operation of IHSMs in the new Sections~3.5 ``Long-Term Operation'' and~3.6
 ``Transportation''. In these sections we address the reviewers' points on the continuous power supply requirement and go
 into detail on the likelihood of spurious tamper alarms triggered by external vibrations. Section~3.5 also addresses
-Reviewer~B's comments on failover, backup and replication of cryptographic secrets.
+Reviewer~B's insightful comments on failover, backup and replication of cryptographic secrets.
 
 \paragraph{Lack of discussion of improved cooling capabilities of IHSMs compared to traditional HSMs.}
 
@@ -88,11 +88,12 @@ don't work'' and~4.3 ``Attacks that work on any HSM'' that provide this missing
 \paragraph{Notes on future work.}
 
 Reviewer~D stated that they would find an outlook on the next design steps towards a practically usable design
-interesting. We have adressed this at the end of Section~7 ``Conclusion'' to the extent of our current plans.
+interesting. We appreciate this helpful comment. We have adressed future work at the end of Section~7 ``Conclusion'' to
+the extent of our current plans.
 
 \paragraph{Design Artifact Availability.}
 
-Reviewer~D stated that acceess to design artifacts would be useful for readers of the paper. We are thankful for their
+Reviewer~D stated that access to design artifacts would be useful for readers of the paper. We are thankful for their
 interest in the results of our work. While we cannot make our design artifacts available as part of the peer review
 process as they contain a multitude of references to the identities of the authors and their employer, we have added a
 brief appendix that the publication version of our paper will contain with a link to the open-source repository