Diff improvements
This commit is contained in:
parent
65734fd7b5
commit
427881c7c5
2 changed files with 43 additions and 10 deletions
|
|
@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ def generate_git_tex_diff(texfile, bibliography, revision):
|
|||
|
||||
bib_proc = subprocess.run(['git', 'diff', f'-U{bib_lines+1}', '--word-diff', '--color=always', revision, bibliography],
|
||||
check=True, capture_output=True)
|
||||
ADDITION_RE_R = '\033\\[32m\\{\\+(.*?)([^\\\\]%.*?)?\\+\\}\033\\[m'
|
||||
DELETION_RE_R = '\033\\[31m\\[-(.*?)([^\\\\]%.*?)?\\-]\033\\[m'
|
||||
ADDITION_RE_R = '\033\\[32m\\{\\+([^\033]*?)([^\\\\]%.*?)?\\+\\}\033\\[m'
|
||||
DELETION_RE_R = '\033\\[31m\\[-([^\033]*?)([^\\\\]%.*?)?\\-]\033\\[m'
|
||||
addition_re = re.compile(ADDITION_RE_R)
|
||||
deletion_re = re.compile(DELETION_RE_R)
|
||||
combined_re = re.compile(f'{DELETION_RE_R}{ADDITION_RE_R}')
|
||||
|
|
@ -61,8 +61,16 @@ def generate_git_tex_diff(texfile, bibliography, revision):
|
|||
line = line.rstrip()
|
||||
if document_started: # diff results in preamble
|
||||
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
debug = 'battery' in line
|
||||
if debug:
|
||||
print('orig:', repr(line), file=sys.stderr)
|
||||
|
||||
def suppress_small_changes(match):
|
||||
nonlocal debug
|
||||
old, _1, new, _2 = match.groups()
|
||||
if debug:
|
||||
print(f'old={repr(old)}, new={repr(new)}', file=sys.stderr)
|
||||
|
||||
if len(old) < 12 and len(new) < 12:
|
||||
return new
|
||||
|
|
@ -70,24 +78,48 @@ def generate_git_tex_diff(texfile, bibliography, revision):
|
|||
if old.count(' ') < 3 and new.count(' ') < 3:
|
||||
return new
|
||||
|
||||
if '}' in old or '{' in old or '{' in new or '}' in new:
|
||||
return new
|
||||
|
||||
new_chars = list(new)
|
||||
for char in old:
|
||||
if char not in string.ascii_letters:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
if char not in new_chars:
|
||||
return match.group(0) # return original text
|
||||
return r' \color{diffred}' + old + r' \color{diffgreen}' + new + ' \color{black}'
|
||||
|
||||
new_chars.remove(char)
|
||||
|
||||
if any(char in string.ascii_letters for char in new_chars):
|
||||
return match.group(0) # return original text
|
||||
return r' \color{diffred}' + old + r' \color{diffgreen}' + new + ' \color{black}'
|
||||
|
||||
return new
|
||||
|
||||
line = combined_re.sub(suppress_small_changes, line)
|
||||
line = addition_re.sub(r' \\color{diffgreen}\1 \\color{black}', line)
|
||||
line = deletion_re.sub(r' \\color{diffred}\1 \\color{black}', line)
|
||||
if debug:
|
||||
print('[1]', line, file=sys.stderr)
|
||||
|
||||
def suppress_small_changes(match, action):
|
||||
change = match.group(1)
|
||||
|
||||
if len(change) < 12 or change.count(' ') < 3 or '}' in change or '{' in change:
|
||||
if action == 'addition':
|
||||
return change
|
||||
else: # deletion
|
||||
return ''
|
||||
|
||||
if action == 'addition':
|
||||
return r' \color{diffgreen}' + change + r' \color{black}'
|
||||
else: # deletion
|
||||
return r' \color{diffred}' + change + r' \color{black}'
|
||||
|
||||
line = addition_re.sub(lambda match: suppress_small_changes(match, 'addition'), line)
|
||||
if debug:
|
||||
print('[2]', line, file=sys.stderr)
|
||||
line = deletion_re.sub(lambda match: suppress_small_changes(match, 'deletion'), line)
|
||||
if debug:
|
||||
print('[3]', line, file=sys.stderr)
|
||||
|
||||
else:
|
||||
if '\\begin{document}' in line:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -180,10 +180,11 @@ similar approaches to tamper detection~\cite{obermaier2018,drimer2008,anderson20
|
|||
|
||||
Shifting our focus from industry use to the academic state of the art, in~\cite{immler2019}, Immler et al. describe an
|
||||
HSM based on precise capacitance measurements of a security mesh, creating a PUF from the mesh. In contrast to
|
||||
traditional meshes, they use a large number of individual traces. Their concept promises a very high degree of
|
||||
protection, but is limited in area covered and component height, as well as the high cost of the advanced analog
|
||||
circuitry required for monitoring. A core component of their design is that they propose its use as a PUF to allow for
|
||||
protection even when powered off, similar to a smart card---but the design is not limited to this use.
|
||||
traditional meshes, they use a large number of individual traces (more than 30 in their example). Their concept
|
||||
promises a very high degree of protection, but is limited in area covered and component height, as well as the high cost
|
||||
of the advanced analog circuitry required for monitoring. A core component of their design is that they propose its use
|
||||
as a PUF to allow for protection even when powered off, similar to a smart card---but the design is not limited to this
|
||||
use.
|
||||
|
||||
In~\cite{tobisch2020}, Tobisch et al.\ describe a construction technique for a hardware security module that is based on
|
||||
a WiFi transceiver inside a conductive enclosure. In their design, a reference signal is sent into the RF cavity formed
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue