Shorten papert
This commit is contained in:
parent
4897a71566
commit
82c4ab9966
1 changed files with 20 additions and 74 deletions
94
paper.tex
94
paper.tex
|
|
@ -60,9 +60,9 @@
|
|||
that convert QKD signals to (insecure) classical signals and back.
|
||||
|
||||
In this paper, we outline an application of the IHSM approach first proposed by \textcite{gotteCantTouchThis2022} to
|
||||
QKD that bootstraps a physically secure repeater node. At the core of our proposal is an optical passthrough
|
||||
connecting multiple optical fibers from the payload through the mesh to the outside world. Our design is low-cost,
|
||||
scales to dozens of optical fibers and allows the joint pass-through of electrical connections.
|
||||
QKD that bootstraps a physically secure repeater node. At the core of our proposal is a work-in-progress optical
|
||||
passthrough connecting multiple optical fibers from the payload through the mesh to the outside world. Our design is
|
||||
low-cost, scales to dozens of optical fibers and allows the joint pass-through of electrical connections.
|
||||
\end{abstract}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Introduction}
|
||||
|
|
@ -297,16 +297,14 @@ approximately \qty{11}{\milli\meter} when using minimal overlap between tab heig
|
|||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\subcaptionbox[Helical transition of single fiber]{Single fiber}{\includegraphics[width=.45\textwidth]{helix_transition.png}}
|
||||
\hfill
|
||||
\subcaptionbox[Helical transition of fiber bundle]{Fiber bundle}{\includegraphics[width=.45\textwidth]{helix_bundle.png}}
|
||||
\subcaptionbox[Helical transition of single fiber]{Single fiber}{\includegraphics[width=.25\textwidth]{helix_transition.png}}
|
||||
\subcaptionbox[Helical transition of fiber bundle]{Fiber bundle}{\includegraphics[width=.25\textwidth]{helix_bundle.png}}
|
||||
\caption[Helically coiling fibers inside the axis tube]{
|
||||
The necessary mesh spacing can be reduced by coiling the fibers inside of the axis tube. The coiled fibers enter
|
||||
the inter-mesh space at an angle equal to the helix lead angle, which reduces the amount of space necessary to
|
||||
complete the transition to horizontal along a circular arc. In this example, a \qty{6}{\milli\meter} outer
|
||||
diameter tube with a \qty{0.5}{\milli\meter} wall thickness is shown with 6 fibers with \qty{0.9}{\milli\meter}
|
||||
outer diameter coiled to a constant bend radius of \qty{9}{\milli\meter}. The lead angle of the resulting helix
|
||||
is \qty{61.5}{\degree}, and past the tube exit, only \qty{5.16}{\milli\meter} of inter-mesh space are necessary.
|
||||
Minimum mesh spacing can be reduced by coiling the fibers inside of the shaft tube. The coiled fibers enter the
|
||||
inter-mesh space at an angle equal to the helix lead angle. Shown here is a \qty{6}{\milli\meter} outer diameter
|
||||
tube with a \qty{0.5}{\milli\meter} wall thickness and 6 fibers with \qty{0.9}{\milli\meter} outer diameter
|
||||
coiled to a constant bend radius of \qty{9}{\milli\meter}. The lead angle of the helix is \qty{61.5}{\degree}.
|
||||
The resulting inter-mesh spacing is \qty{5.16}{\milli\meter}.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{qkd_fig_fiber_helix}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
|
@ -364,42 +362,19 @@ Concentric labyrinth meshes allow for a wide range of different configurations.
|
|||
next is the sum of the required width of the inter-mesh space and the safety margin needed betwween any cables or the
|
||||
inter-mesh bracket and the tabs. When the mesh is constructed using rigid PCB tabs that are inserted as-is, without
|
||||
bending them, and when all tabs have the same width and thickness, the radial width of the swept area decreases from tab
|
||||
to tab going outwards as shown in Figure\ \ref{qkd_fig_mesh_ring_reduction}. A consequence of this is that when the
|
||||
design target are constant width inter-mesh spaces, the tabs' pitch decreases going outwards.
|
||||
to tab going outwards. A consequence of this is that when the design target are constant width inter-mesh spaces, the
|
||||
tabs' pitch decreases going outwards.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{mesh_ring_reduction.pdf}
|
||||
\caption[Coaxial labyrinth mesh tab swept area]{Top-down view of a coaxial labyrinth mesh with three tabs, with the
|
||||
area swept by each tab highlighted. When rigid, planar tabs of a single width $w$ are used, the radial width of the
|
||||
swept areas decreases and approaches the tabs' thickness $t$ as their radius $r$ increases.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\label{qkd_fig_mesh_ring_reduction}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
The safety margin required to avoid collisions between the meshes and the stator\todo{stator is a nice word for the
|
||||
entire non-rotating part of the assembly. stator/star bracket?} can be kept low for the primary mesh because this mesh
|
||||
has high-quality bearings on both ends, leading to good axis alignment. In contrast, for the secondary mesh considerable
|
||||
margins have to be included if the mesh is driven by a cooling fan motor, as the bearings in such fans are not very
|
||||
precise. With loose bearings, angular axis misalignment can lead to several millimeters of deflection in both the radial
|
||||
and axial dimensions as illustrated in Figure\ \ref{qkd_fig_mesh_ring_bearing_tolerance}.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{mesh_ring_bearing_tolerance.pdf}
|
||||
\caption[Coaxial labyrinth mesh axis alignment tolerance illustration]{Illustration of the effect of angular
|
||||
misalignment of the axis of rotation caused by tolerances in motor bearings in a coaxial labyrinth mesh with two
|
||||
tabs. The area swept by each tab, and its increase due to misalignment are highlighted. The left illustration shows
|
||||
the ideal and misaligned meshes, and the right illustration superimposes the area increase from the left
|
||||
illustration on the ideally aligned mesh. This illustration is not to scale.}
|
||||
\label{qkd_fig_mesh_ring_bearing_tolerance}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
The safety margin required to avoid collisions between the meshes and the stator can be kept low for the primary mesh
|
||||
because this mesh has high-quality bearings on both ends, leading to good axis alignment. In contrast, for the secondary
|
||||
mesh, margins have to be included if the mesh is driven by a cooling fan motor, as the bearings in such fans
|
||||
are not very precise, resulting in misalignment increasing with radius.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Offset labyrinth meshes}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,page=2]{shaft_countermeasures_b.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,page=2]{shaft_countermeasures_b.pdf}
|
||||
\caption[Offset labyrinth mesh schema]{Offset labyrinth mesh schema, cross-section and top-down views. The two
|
||||
dashed lines indicate the two meshes' offset axes of rotation, shifted in $x$ direction in both views.}
|
||||
\label{qkd_fig_offset_lab_schema}
|
||||
|
|
@ -425,7 +400,7 @@ feedthrough that improves on the simple helical feedthrough we introduced above.
|
|||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{schema_wire.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{schema_wire.pdf}
|
||||
\caption[Offset labyrinth mesh schema with fiber layout]{}
|
||||
\label{qkd_fig_offset_lab_fiber}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
|
@ -448,23 +423,16 @@ perspectives.
|
|||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{render_exp_1.png}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{render_exp_1.png}
|
||||
\caption[Offset labyrinth mesh assmbly exploded render]{}
|
||||
\label{qkd_fig_lab_mesh_exp_1}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{render_exp_2.png}
|
||||
\caption[Offset labyrinth mesh assmbly exploded render]{}
|
||||
\label{qkd_fig_lab_mesh_exp_2}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Interlocking gear meshes}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h!]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,page=3]{shaft_countermeasures_b.pdf}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,page=3]{shaft_countermeasures_b.pdf}
|
||||
\caption[Offset gear labyrinth mesh schema]{Offset gear labyrinth mesh schema, cross-section and top-down views. In
|
||||
this example, the axis is shifted by about twice the offset from the previous offset labyrinth mesh schema in
|
||||
Figure\ \ref{qkd_fig_offset_lab_schema}.}
|
||||
|
|
@ -490,28 +458,6 @@ In this setup, the mesh tabs act like gear teeth. Depending on the ratio between
|
|||
meshes do not have to rotate at the same rate of rotation and harmonic ratios are possible. Additionally, unlike actual
|
||||
gears which need to constantly maintain an area of contact, both co-rotating and counter-rotating setups are possible.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\subcaptionbox[Offset gear labyrinth mesh assembly render]{}{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{render_side_1.png}}
|
||||
\subcaptionbox[Offset gear labyrinth mesh assembly render]{}{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{render_side_2.png}}
|
||||
|
||||
\caption{
|
||||
Renderings of the complete offset labyrinth gear mesh assembly.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{gear_plan_1.pdf}
|
||||
\caption[Offset gear mesh assmbly schema]{}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{gear_plan_2.pdf}
|
||||
\caption[Offset gear mesh schedule]{}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Physical attacks and countermeasures}
|
||||
In this section we will consider possible ways to attack an IHSM-secured QKD relay, as well as potential
|
||||
countermeasures.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue