Related work mostly done
This commit is contained in:
parent
ded9947d11
commit
d103b16e03
1 changed files with 36 additions and 30 deletions
|
|
@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ condition between the number of turns and the number of inversions within each t
|
|||
inductors below, although in contemporary literature, this condition is never explicitly stated
|
||||
\cite{eppenAnforderungenEinzelteileRundfunkempfanger1927, kleinSpulenUndSchwingungskreise1941,
|
||||
wiggeRundfunktechnischesHandbuch1930}.
|
||||
% TODO cite \cite{querfurthCoilWindingDescription1954}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{PCB inductor design for wireless power transfer}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -213,27 +212,34 @@ a pure air-core inductor.
|
|||
|
||||
\subsection{Twisted Inductors in RFIC Design}
|
||||
|
||||
Planar inductors are commonly used in RF ICs. In RFIC design, the major challenges are area optimization, and precisely
|
||||
predicting the inductor's characteristics during the design phase. Common optimizations include applying a variable
|
||||
trace pitch to reduce distributed capacitance\cite{lopez-villegasImprovementQualityFactor2000}, and applying variable
|
||||
trace width to decrease equivalent series resistance while preserving total inductance and quality
|
||||
factor\cite{hsuAnalyticalDesignAlgorithm2008}.
|
||||
|
||||
In RFICs, inductors are commonly designed as \emph{balanced} inductors with a grounded central node. Such designs
|
||||
interleave two counter-wound planar spiral inductors on the same layer with the help of some jumper connections on a
|
||||
second layer\cite{daneshDifferentiallyDrivenSymmetric2002,martinMultiturnTwistedInductor2016}. The use of such designs
|
||||
in RFIC design is mainly focused on their electrical symmetry, so that the two input ports can be fed with a fully
|
||||
differential signal, with the inductor loading both driver outputs equally across the inductor's frequency range.
|
||||
|
||||
The simplest twisted inductor as shown below with $k=1$ inversion corresponds to the counterwound scheme that is
|
||||
commonly used for two-layer planar
|
||||
inductors\cite{lopeFirstSelfResonant2021,sproHighVoltageInsulationDesign2021,leePrintedSpiralWinding2011a}, and
|
||||
which has been used to stack planar coils for more than a century\cite{flemingPrinciplesElectricWave1910}.
|
||||
|
||||
Another, more recent design interleaves two counter-wound planar spiral inductors on the same layer with the help of
|
||||
some jumper connections on a second layer, as shown in \cite{daneshDifferentiallyDrivenSymmetric2002}. The use of this
|
||||
design in RFIC design is mainly focused on its electrical symmetry, so that the two input ports can be fed with a fully
|
||||
differential signal, with both driver outputs being loaded equally across the inductor's frequency range.
|
||||
|
||||
% They note that the main point behind the design is electrical symmetry of the two ports to make driving the thing
|
||||
% differentially cleaner. We should adopt this observation for our inductors, which likewise are electrically symmetric
|
||||
% when compared to a single-layer spiral inductor.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Inductive Wireless Power Transfer in Practice}
|
||||
|
||||
Inductive WPT has been proposed in a large number of scenarios\cite{zhangWirelessPowerTransfer2019}, each of which comes
|
||||
with a set of unique constraints. When WPT is used to charge an electric toothbrush, the implementation cost of the
|
||||
system is critical, while efficiency and total power output are of little concern. Mechanically, in an electric
|
||||
toothbrush's charging system, the position and spacing of the transmitter and receiver coils can easily be controlled
|
||||
down to millimeter precision.
|
||||
Inductive WPT has been proposed in a large number of
|
||||
scenarios\cite{zhangWirelessPowerTransfer2019,mouWirelessPowerTransfer2015}, each of which comes with a set of unique
|
||||
constraints. When WPT is used to charge an electric toothbrush, the implementation cost of the system is critical, while
|
||||
efficiency and total power output are of little concern. Mechanically, in an electric toothbrush's charging system, the
|
||||
position and spacing of the transmitter and receiver coils can easily be controlled down to millimeter precision.
|
||||
|
||||
In contrast to this, wireless smartphone charging is a much more demanding application. Here, the total cost of the
|
||||
system is only secondary, but the receiver's form factor is critical, and total power output as well as efficiency
|
||||
|
|
@ -241,33 +247,33 @@ become major objectives. At the same time, in wireless smartphone charging, posi
|
|||
two coils in the charging base and in the phone may be positioned more than a centimeter off-axis, with a gap of several
|
||||
millimeters and potentially not even in parallel planes.
|
||||
|
||||
Power transfer across large distances is even more of a concern in implantable medical devices. Where a wireless phone
|
||||
charger must be able to bridge distances of a few millimeters, an implantable medical device might be situated
|
||||
underneath several centimeter of tissue and bones. At the same time, cost is of (almost) no concern in this medical
|
||||
application, which enables the use of complex manufacturing techniques, customized electronic components and exotic
|
||||
materials.
|
||||
Power transfer across large distances is even more of a concern in implantable medical
|
||||
devices\cite{mooreApplicationsWirelessPower2019}. Where a wireless phone charger must be able to bridge distances of a
|
||||
few millimeters, an implantable medical device might be situated underneath several centimeter of tissue and bones. At
|
||||
the same time, cost is of (almost) no concern in this medical application, which enables the use of complex
|
||||
manufacturing techniques, customized electronic components and exotic materials.
|
||||
|
||||
While all of the aforementioned applications transfer somewhere between a few hundred milliwatts and several watts of
|
||||
power, at the other end of the spectrum there is a large body of research suggesting the use of inductive wireless power
|
||||
transfer for the charging of electric vehicles (EVs). In this application, the wireless power transfer system replaces
|
||||
the conventional wired charging connector, which improves the systems' user experience given the strong force required
|
||||
to seat or unseat these rather large connectors, as well as the heft of the required water-cooled cables. In this
|
||||
application, size is of (almost) no concern, but at several kilowatt up to dozens or even a hundred kilowatt, the
|
||||
transferred power is enormous and consequentially efficiency becomes of utmost importance. When charging an EV at a
|
||||
rate of 30 kW, an efficiency improvement of just $0.1\%$ corresponds to a reduction in power dissipation of 30 W.
|
||||
Besides the monetary cost of the power lost this way, each small improvement enables a reduction in size of heat sinks
|
||||
and other cooling components, which directly translates to a decrease in cost.
|
||||
transfer for the charging of electric vehicles
|
||||
(EVs)\cite{liWirelessPowerTransfer2015,mouEnergyEfficientAdaptiveDesign2017}. In this application, the wireless power
|
||||
transfer system usually replaces the conventional wired charging connector, which improves the systems' user experience
|
||||
given the strong force required to seat or unseat these rather large connectors, as well as the heft of the required
|
||||
water-cooled cables. In this application, size is of (almost) no concern, but at charging rates up to tens of kilowatt,
|
||||
efficiency becomes critical. When charging an EV at a rate of 10 kW, an efficiency improvement of just $0.1\%$
|
||||
corresponds to a reduction in power dissipation of 10 W. Besides the monetary cost of the power lost this way, each
|
||||
small improvement enables a reduction in size of heat sinks and other cooling components, which directly translates to a
|
||||
decrease in cost.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Air-Core Inductors for Inductive Power Transfer}
|
||||
|
||||
In inductive wireless power transfer, air-core inductors are often used since in most applications, an air gap of
|
||||
several millimeters or more is expected, and adding a ferrite core would not change the system's performance by much in
|
||||
these circumstances. A common way to use ferrites in WPT applications is magnetically shielding the inductor's back side
|
||||
with a ferrite plate such that the field does not extend beyond the coil's back side, and to reduce eddy current losses
|
||||
when the WPT coils are placed near metal
|
||||
Across application areas, air-core inductors are often used for wireless power transfer since in most applications, an
|
||||
air gap of several millimeters or more is expected, and adding a ferrite core would not change the system's performance
|
||||
by much in these circumstances. A common way to use ferrites in WPT applications is magnetically shielding the
|
||||
inductor's back side with a ferrite plate such that the field does not extend beyond the coil's back side, and to reduce
|
||||
eddy current losses when the WPT coils are placed near metal
|
||||
objects\cite{batraEffectFerriteAddition2015,leeSimpleWirelessPower2017,muehlmannMutualCouplingModeling2012}.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Twisted Inductor Design}
|
||||
|
||||
We can approach twisted inductors by construction. Let us first consider a simple, planar, circular spiral coil with a
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue