Related work mostly done

This commit is contained in:
jaseg 2024-11-08 17:59:27 +01:00
parent ded9947d11
commit d103b16e03

View file

@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ condition between the number of turns and the number of inversions within each t
inductors below, although in contemporary literature, this condition is never explicitly stated
\cite{eppenAnforderungenEinzelteileRundfunkempfanger1927, kleinSpulenUndSchwingungskreise1941,
wiggeRundfunktechnischesHandbuch1930}.
% TODO cite \cite{querfurthCoilWindingDescription1954}
\subsection{PCB inductor design for wireless power transfer}
@ -213,27 +212,34 @@ a pure air-core inductor.
\subsection{Twisted Inductors in RFIC Design}
Planar inductors are commonly used in RF ICs. In RFIC design, the major challenges are area optimization, and precisely
predicting the inductor's characteristics during the design phase. Common optimizations include applying a variable
trace pitch to reduce distributed capacitance\cite{lopez-villegasImprovementQualityFactor2000}, and applying variable
trace width to decrease equivalent series resistance while preserving total inductance and quality
factor\cite{hsuAnalyticalDesignAlgorithm2008}.
In RFICs, inductors are commonly designed as \emph{balanced} inductors with a grounded central node. Such designs
interleave two counter-wound planar spiral inductors on the same layer with the help of some jumper connections on a
second layer\cite{daneshDifferentiallyDrivenSymmetric2002,martinMultiturnTwistedInductor2016}. The use of such designs
in RFIC design is mainly focused on their electrical symmetry, so that the two input ports can be fed with a fully
differential signal, with the inductor loading both driver outputs equally across the inductor's frequency range.
The simplest twisted inductor as shown below with $k=1$ inversion corresponds to the counterwound scheme that is
commonly used for two-layer planar
inductors\cite{lopeFirstSelfResonant2021,sproHighVoltageInsulationDesign2021,leePrintedSpiralWinding2011a}, and
which has been used to stack planar coils for more than a century\cite{flemingPrinciplesElectricWave1910}.
Another, more recent design interleaves two counter-wound planar spiral inductors on the same layer with the help of
some jumper connections on a second layer, as shown in \cite{daneshDifferentiallyDrivenSymmetric2002}. The use of this
design in RFIC design is mainly focused on its electrical symmetry, so that the two input ports can be fed with a fully
differential signal, with both driver outputs being loaded equally across the inductor's frequency range.
% They note that the main point behind the design is electrical symmetry of the two ports to make driving the thing
% differentially cleaner. We should adopt this observation for our inductors, which likewise are electrically symmetric
% when compared to a single-layer spiral inductor.
\subsection{Inductive Wireless Power Transfer in Practice}
Inductive WPT has been proposed in a large number of scenarios\cite{zhangWirelessPowerTransfer2019}, each of which comes
with a set of unique constraints. When WPT is used to charge an electric toothbrush, the implementation cost of the
system is critical, while efficiency and total power output are of little concern. Mechanically, in an electric
toothbrush's charging system, the position and spacing of the transmitter and receiver coils can easily be controlled
down to millimeter precision.
Inductive WPT has been proposed in a large number of
scenarios\cite{zhangWirelessPowerTransfer2019,mouWirelessPowerTransfer2015}, each of which comes with a set of unique
constraints. When WPT is used to charge an electric toothbrush, the implementation cost of the system is critical, while
efficiency and total power output are of little concern. Mechanically, in an electric toothbrush's charging system, the
position and spacing of the transmitter and receiver coils can easily be controlled down to millimeter precision.
In contrast to this, wireless smartphone charging is a much more demanding application. Here, the total cost of the
system is only secondary, but the receiver's form factor is critical, and total power output as well as efficiency
@ -241,33 +247,33 @@ become major objectives. At the same time, in wireless smartphone charging, posi
two coils in the charging base and in the phone may be positioned more than a centimeter off-axis, with a gap of several
millimeters and potentially not even in parallel planes.
Power transfer across large distances is even more of a concern in implantable medical devices. Where a wireless phone
charger must be able to bridge distances of a few millimeters, an implantable medical device might be situated
underneath several centimeter of tissue and bones. At the same time, cost is of (almost) no concern in this medical
application, which enables the use of complex manufacturing techniques, customized electronic components and exotic
materials.
Power transfer across large distances is even more of a concern in implantable medical
devices\cite{mooreApplicationsWirelessPower2019}. Where a wireless phone charger must be able to bridge distances of a
few millimeters, an implantable medical device might be situated underneath several centimeter of tissue and bones. At
the same time, cost is of (almost) no concern in this medical application, which enables the use of complex
manufacturing techniques, customized electronic components and exotic materials.
While all of the aforementioned applications transfer somewhere between a few hundred milliwatts and several watts of
power, at the other end of the spectrum there is a large body of research suggesting the use of inductive wireless power
transfer for the charging of electric vehicles (EVs). In this application, the wireless power transfer system replaces
the conventional wired charging connector, which improves the systems' user experience given the strong force required
to seat or unseat these rather large connectors, as well as the heft of the required water-cooled cables. In this
application, size is of (almost) no concern, but at several kilowatt up to dozens or even a hundred kilowatt, the
transferred power is enormous and consequentially efficiency becomes of utmost importance. When charging an EV at a
rate of 30 kW, an efficiency improvement of just $0.1\%$ corresponds to a reduction in power dissipation of 30 W.
Besides the monetary cost of the power lost this way, each small improvement enables a reduction in size of heat sinks
and other cooling components, which directly translates to a decrease in cost.
transfer for the charging of electric vehicles
(EVs)\cite{liWirelessPowerTransfer2015,mouEnergyEfficientAdaptiveDesign2017}. In this application, the wireless power
transfer system usually replaces the conventional wired charging connector, which improves the systems' user experience
given the strong force required to seat or unseat these rather large connectors, as well as the heft of the required
water-cooled cables. In this application, size is of (almost) no concern, but at charging rates up to tens of kilowatt,
efficiency becomes critical. When charging an EV at a rate of 10 kW, an efficiency improvement of just $0.1\%$
corresponds to a reduction in power dissipation of 10 W. Besides the monetary cost of the power lost this way, each
small improvement enables a reduction in size of heat sinks and other cooling components, which directly translates to a
decrease in cost.
\subsection{Air-Core Inductors for Inductive Power Transfer}
In inductive wireless power transfer, air-core inductors are often used since in most applications, an air gap of
several millimeters or more is expected, and adding a ferrite core would not change the system's performance by much in
these circumstances. A common way to use ferrites in WPT applications is magnetically shielding the inductor's back side
with a ferrite plate such that the field does not extend beyond the coil's back side, and to reduce eddy current losses
when the WPT coils are placed near metal
Across application areas, air-core inductors are often used for wireless power transfer since in most applications, an
air gap of several millimeters or more is expected, and adding a ferrite core would not change the system's performance
by much in these circumstances. A common way to use ferrites in WPT applications is magnetically shielding the
inductor's back side with a ferrite plate such that the field does not extend beyond the coil's back side, and to reduce
eddy current losses when the WPT coils are placed near metal
objects\cite{batraEffectFerriteAddition2015,leeSimpleWirelessPower2017,muehlmannMutualCouplingModeling2012}.
\section{Twisted Inductor Design}
We can approach twisted inductors by construction. Let us first consider a simple, planar, circular spiral coil with a