This commit is contained in:
jaseg 2024-09-13 17:52:20 +02:00
parent 7d717fb5c5
commit 96e8bad4eb

View file

@ -179,11 +179,28 @@ values of $n$ are possible, which will rotate the second port around the coordin
\section{FEM Simulation}
\subsection{Ohmic Resistance}
To validate our analytical approximations, we performed a series of FEM simulations in both Elmer FEM and Simulia CST.
For a number of inductor layouts, we performed simulations to determine ohmic resistance, inductance, and parasitic
capacitance. For a subset of these layout variants we additionally performed simulations to determine the coupling
factor between a pair of identical inductors at a number of different distances and rotations.
\subsection{Inductance}
\paragraph{Ohmic Resistance}
Determining ohmic resistance by FEM is reasonably easy. In Elmer FEM, we can use the built-in joint static current and
joule heating solver to determine the ohmic resistance at a given current.
\subsection{Parasitic Capacitance and Self-Resonant Frequency}
\paragraph{Inductance}
We let Elmer determine inductance by first using its coil solver to determine the volumetric current density in our mesh
given a test current, then applying its magnetodynamics solver to solve the electromagnetic field. Elmer provides
routines to derive the total magnetic field energy $U_\text{mag}$ from an EM field solution. Since we have only our
inductor under test inside the simulation volume, with test current $I_\text{test}$, we can then derive the inductor's
inductance according to the well-known relation\todo{Find decent source}:
\begin{equation}
L = \frac{2\cdot U_\text{mag}}{I_\text{test}^2}
\end{equation}
\paragraph{Parasitic Capacitance and Self-Resonant Frequency}
Determining parasitic capacitance is more complex.
\subsection{Coupling}