WIP
This commit is contained in:
parent
81ee2ad5e7
commit
5c0eb54ace
1 changed files with 12 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -73,10 +73,21 @@ capability. In inductive WPT, the contactless interface between the transmitter
|
|||
pair of coupled inductors. Usually, these inductors are used in resonant circuits that are tuned to have similar
|
||||
resonant frequencies.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{WPT inductor coupling}
|
||||
|
||||
In inductive WPT systems the coupling between the coils is highly dependent on the specific geometry of the coils, their
|
||||
relative positioning, as well as any nearby magnetically permeable materials. In particular the distance between
|
||||
transmitter and receiver coil is critical, and the coupling factor of a pair of coils falls off sharply as their
|
||||
distance exceeds some small fraction of their physical size.
|
||||
distance exceeds some fraction of their physical size. Offset and cross-axis rotation both influence coupling to a
|
||||
lesser degree.
|
||||
|
||||
\todo{Analytical expressions, and explanation how the factors mentioned above derive from those.}
|
||||
|
||||
In most WPT systems, distance and alignment are the factors of primary concern. In IHSM applications, where power is
|
||||
transferred through a continuously rotating joint, both take only a subordinate role, as both can easily be controlled.
|
||||
Instead, we observed a surprising third factor: If the magnetostatic field generated by the coils is not axially
|
||||
symmetric, their continous rotation periodically modulates their coupling, introducing low-frequency ripple into the
|
||||
secondary-side power output.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Related Work}
|
||||
\subsection{Twisted Inductors in RFIC Design}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue