tex: add some sources

This commit is contained in:
jaseg 2020-01-12 18:24:00 +01:00
parent 4cbe8d444b
commit 5cf7f77cc4
2 changed files with 35 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -648,3 +648,31 @@
year = {2016}
}
@article{perez01,
author = {Noelia Uribe-P{\'e}rez and Luis Hern{\'a}ndez and David de la Vega and Itziar Angulo},
comment = {Questionable publisher but seems good-quality, well-researched. Maybe not published elsewhere since it's just an industry/legislative review article?},
doi = {10.3390/app6030068},
journaltitle = {Applied Sciences},
month = feb,
number = {3},
organization = {MDPI},
pages = {68},
title = {State of the Art and Trends Review of Smart Metering in Electricity Grids},
volume = {6},
x-color = {#cc3300},
year = {2016}
}
@article{urtasun01,
author = {Andoni Urtasun and Pablo Sanchis and David Barricarte and Luis Marroyo},
comment = {has lots of self-citations by urtasun},
journaltitle = {Renewable Energy},
month = jan,
pages = {325--336},
publisher = {Elsevier},
title = {Energy management strategy for a battery-diesel stand-alone system with distributed PV generation based on grid frequency modulation},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.020},
volume = {66},
year = {2014}
}

View file

@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ against attacks and simplify updates. Combined with the small market sizes in sm
cost lies in the meter's software % TODO cite?
There exist multiple competing standards applicable to various parts of a smart electricity meter. In addition,
most countries have their own certification regimen\cite{cenelec01}. This complexity creates a large development
burden for new market entrants.
burden for new market entrants\cite{perez01}.
}
this produces a high cost pressure on the software development process for smart electricity meters.
@ -478,6 +478,12 @@ simple to reduce attack surface there.
\subsection{Landline IP}
\subsection{IP-based wireless systems}
\subsection{Frequency modulation as a communication channel}
For our system, we chose grid frequency modulation (henceforth GFC) as a low-bandwidth uni-directional communications channel.
Compared to traditional PLC GFC requires no additional hardware, works reliably throughout the grid and is harder to
manipulate by a malicious actor.
% FIXME \cite{urtasun01}
\subsubsection{The frequency dependance of grid frequency}
\subsubsection{Control systems coupled to grid frequency}
\subsubsection{Avoiding dangerous modes}
@ -596,9 +602,6 @@ correctly configure than it is to simply use separate hardware and secure the in
\chapter{Economic viability of countermeasures}
\section{Attack cost}
\section{Countermeasure cost}
\section{Conclusion}
\chapter{The ethics and security implications of centralized crackdown on energy theft}
% FIXME maybe include a standard for the technical side of a safety reset system here, e.g. in the style of an IETF draft?