ma: finish draft of country comparison section
This commit is contained in:
parent
ac8c748802
commit
2d78c07d37
2 changed files with 157 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -1226,4 +1226,103 @@
|
|||
volume = {73},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TechReport{ukgov01,
|
||||
date = {2018},
|
||||
institution = {UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy},
|
||||
title = {Smart Metering Implementation Programme Progress Report for 2018},
|
||||
url = {https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/smart-metering-implementation-programme-progress-report-2018},
|
||||
urldate = {2020-05-18},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TechReport{ukgov02,
|
||||
date = {2014},
|
||||
institution = {UK Department of Energy and Climate Change},
|
||||
title = {Smart Metering Implementation ProgrammeSmart Metering Equipment Technical Specifications},
|
||||
url = {https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/381535/SMIP_E2E_SMETS2.pdf},
|
||||
urldate = {2020-05-18},
|
||||
version = {1.58},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TechReport{ukgov03,
|
||||
date = {2016},
|
||||
institution = {UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy},
|
||||
title = {Smart Meter Rollout Cost-Benefit Analysis Part I},
|
||||
url = {https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/tris/cs/index.cfm/search/?trisaction=search.detail&year=2017&num=350&iLang=EN},
|
||||
urldate = {2020-05-18},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Thesis{mahlknecht01,
|
||||
author = {Peter Mahlknecht},
|
||||
date = {2014},
|
||||
institution = {Technische Universität Wien},
|
||||
title = {Diplomarbeit Sicherheitsmodul für ein Smart Metering Gateway},
|
||||
url = {https://publik.tuwien.ac.at/files/PubDat_233035.pdf},
|
||||
urldate = {2020-05-18},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@WWW{delaw01,
|
||||
title = {Stromgrundversorgungsverordnung StromGVV § 19 Unterbrechung der Versorgung},
|
||||
url = {http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stromgvv/__19.html},
|
||||
urldate = {2020-05-18},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Article{cuijpers01,
|
||||
author = {Colette Cuijpers and Bert-Jaap Koops},
|
||||
date = {2012},
|
||||
journaltitle = {European data protection},
|
||||
title = {Smart metering and privacy in Europe: lessons from the Dutch case},
|
||||
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5170-5_12},
|
||||
journalsubtitle = {Coming of age},
|
||||
pages = {269-293},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@WWW{ec04,
|
||||
editor = {The European Commission},
|
||||
date = {2012},
|
||||
title = {The Energy Efficiency Directive},
|
||||
url = {https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/energy-efficiency/targets-directive-and-rules/energy-efficiency-directive_en},
|
||||
urldate = {2020-05-18},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Article{aubel01,
|
||||
author = {Pol Van Aubel and Erik Poll},
|
||||
date = {2019},
|
||||
journaltitle = {International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems},
|
||||
title = {Smart metering in the Netherlands: what, how and why},
|
||||
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.01.001},
|
||||
issn = {0142-0615},
|
||||
pages = {719-725},
|
||||
volume = {109},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TechReport{dsmrp3,
|
||||
date = {2014},
|
||||
institution = {Netbeheer Nederland WG DSMR},
|
||||
title = {Dutch Smart Meter Requirements P3 Companion Standard},
|
||||
url = {https://www.netbeheernederland.nl/_upload/Files/Slimme_meter_15_1f3c5c9b2c.pdf},
|
||||
urldate = {2020-05-18},
|
||||
version = {4.0.7},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@TechReport{dsmrp1,
|
||||
date = {2016},
|
||||
institution = {Netbeheer Nederland WG DSMR},
|
||||
title = {Dutch Smart Meter Requirements P1 Companion Standard},
|
||||
url = {https://smarty.creos.net/wp-content/uploads/DutchSmartMeterRequirements.pdf},
|
||||
urldate = {2020-05-18},
|
||||
version = {5.0.2},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@InProceedings{anderson01,
|
||||
author = {Ross Anderson and Shailendra Fuloria},
|
||||
booktitle = {2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications},
|
||||
date = {2010},
|
||||
title = {Who controls the off switch?},
|
||||
doi = {10.1109/SMARTGRID.2010.5622026},
|
||||
location = {Gaithersburg, MD},
|
||||
pages = {96-101},
|
||||
url = {https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/meters-offswitch.pdf},
|
||||
urldate = {2020-05-18},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Comment{jabref-meta: databaseType:biblatex;}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -462,13 +462,56 @@ transport encryption and other cryptographic services\cite{bsi-tr-03109-2,bsi-tr
|
|||
% FIXME
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Germany}
|
||||
% FIXME
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{France}
|
||||
% FIXME
|
||||
Germany standardized smart metering on a national level. Apart from the calibration standards applying to any type of
|
||||
meter smart meters are covered by a set of communications and security standards developed by the German Federal Office
|
||||
for Information Security (BSI). Germany mandates smart meter installations for newly constructed buildings and during
|
||||
major renovations but does not require most legacy residential installations to be upgraded. This is a consequence of a
|
||||
2013 cost-benefit analysis that found these upgrades to be uneconomical for the vast majority of residential
|
||||
customers\cite{bmwi03,bmwi1,bmwe01,brown01}.
|
||||
|
||||
The German standards strictly separate between metering and communication functions. Both are split into separate
|
||||
devices, the \emph{meter} and the \emph{gateway} (called emph{smart meter gateway} in full and often abbreviated
|
||||
emph{SMGW}). One or several meters connect to a gateway through a COSEM-derived protocol. The communication interface
|
||||
between meter and gateway can optionally be physically unidirectional. An unidirectional interface eliminates any
|
||||
possibility of meter firmware compromise. The gateway contains a cryptographic security module similar to a
|
||||
smartcard\cite{mahlknecht01} that is entrusted with signing of measurements and maintaining an authenticated and
|
||||
encrypted communication channel with its authorities. Security of the system is certified according to a Common Criteria
|
||||
process.
|
||||
|
||||
The German specification does not include any support for load switches outside of demand-side management as they are
|
||||
common in some other countries. It does not prohibit the installation of one behind the smart meter installation. This
|
||||
makes it theoretically possible for a utility company to still install a load switch to disconnect a customer, but this
|
||||
would be a spearate installation from the smart meter. In Germany there are significant barriers that have to be met
|
||||
before a utility company may cut power to a household\cite{delaw01}. The elision of a load switch means attacks on
|
||||
German meters will be limited in influence to billing irregularities and attacks using DSM equipment.
|
||||
|
||||
% FIXME elaborate DSM attacks vs. whole-household attacks in attacks section
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{The Netherlands}
|
||||
The Netherlands were early to take initiative to roll out smart metering after its recognition by the European
|
||||
Commission in 2006\cite{cuijpers01,ec04}. After overcoming political issuses the Netherlands were above the European
|
||||
median in 2018 having replaced almost half of all meters\cite{cuijpers01,ec03}. Dutch smart meters are standardized by a
|
||||
consortium of distribution system operators. They integrate gateway and metrology functions into one device. The
|
||||
utility-facing interface is a IEC DLMS/COSEM-based interface over cellular radio such as GPRS or
|
||||
LTE\cite{aubel01}. Like e.g.\ the German standard, the Dutch standard precisely specifies all communication
|
||||
interfaces of the meter\cite{dsmrp3}. Another parallel is that the Dutch standard also does not cover any functionality
|
||||
for remotely disconnecting a household. This absence of a load switch limits attacks on Dutch smart meters to causing
|
||||
billing irregularities.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{The UK}
|
||||
% FIXME
|
||||
|
||||
The UK is currently undergoing a smart metering rollout. Meters in the UK are nationally standardized to provide both
|
||||
Zigbee ZSE-based and IEC DLMS/COSEM connectivity. UK smart metering specifications are shared between electrical and gas
|
||||
meters. Different to other countries' specifications the UK national specifications require electrical meters to have an
|
||||
integrated load switch and gas meters to have an integrated valve. In the UK a significant number of consumers are
|
||||
subject to prepaid electricity contracts. Prepayment and credit functionality are also specified in the national smart
|
||||
metering standard, as is remote firmware update functionality. Outside communications in these standards is performed
|
||||
through a gateway (there called \emph{communications hub}) that can be shared between several meters
|
||||
\cite{ukgov01,ukgov02,ukgov03,brown01,sato01}. The combination of both gas and electricity metering into one family of
|
||||
standards and the exceptionally large set of \emph{required} features make the UK regulations the maximalist among the
|
||||
ones in this section. The mandatory inclusion of both load switches and remote connectivity up to remote firmware update
|
||||
make it an interesting attack target.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Italy}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -476,9 +519,10 @@ Italy was among the first countries to legally mandate the widespread installati
|
|||
in 2006 and 2007 by law set a starting date for the rollout in 2008\cite{brown01}. The Italian electricity market was
|
||||
recently privatized. While the wholesale market and transmission network privatization has advanced the vast majority of
|
||||
retail customers continued to use the incumbent distribution system operator ENEL as their supplier\cite{ec03}. This
|
||||
dominant position allowed ENEL to orchestrate the large-scale rollout of smart meters in Italy. An unique feature of the
|
||||
Italian smart metering infrastructure is that it relies on Powerline Communication (PLC) to bridge distances between
|
||||
meters and cellular radio gateways\cite{gungor01}.
|
||||
dominant position allowed ENEL to orchestrate the large-scale rollout of smart meters in Italy. Almost every meter in
|
||||
Italy had been replaced by a smart meter by 2018\cite{ec03}. An unique feature of the Italian smart metering
|
||||
infrastructure is that it relies on Powerline Communication (PLC) to bridge distances between meters and cellular radio
|
||||
gateways\cite{gungor01}.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Japan}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -487,7 +531,13 @@ standardization effort has been spent on smart home integration.\cite{usitc01,sa
|
|||
standards (JIS) for metrology and physical dimensions. The TEPCO deployment currently being rolled out is based on the
|
||||
IEC DLMS/COSEM standards suite for remote meter reading in conjuction with the Japanese ECHONET protocol for the
|
||||
home-area network. Smart meters are connected to TEPCO's backend systems through the customer's internet connection,
|
||||
sub-gigahertz radio based on 802.15.4 framing, regular landline internet or PLC\cite{toshiba01}.
|
||||
sub-gigahertz radio based on 802.15.4 framing, regular landline internet or PLC\cite{toshiba01,sato01}.
|
||||
|
||||
A unique point in the Japanese utility metering landscape is that the current practice is monthly manual readings. In
|
||||
Japan residential utility meters are usually mounted outside the building on an exterior wall and every month someone
|
||||
with a mirror on a long stick will come and read the meter. The meter reader then makes a thermal paper print-out of the
|
||||
updated utility bill and puts it into the resident's post box. This practice gives consumers good control over their
|
||||
consumption but does incur significant pesonnel overhead. % FIXME citation. Maybe the toshiba one?
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{The USA}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue